Category Archives: Tanach Study

The Tree of Life Paradox: A Foundational Inquiry for Jewish Theological Research and Project Understanding

The Tree of Life Paradox: A Foundational Inquiry for Jewish Theological Research and Project Understanding

The Tree of Life is a paradox that no one has examined. We are a dedicated agent committed to thorough Bible research. Also focus on disseminating foundational truths through rigorous project work and robust website SEO. We must delve into the origins of creation to enhance learning and theological insight. Our sages have studied the Torah for millennia. Through this focused study, they have successfully uncovered profound spiritual truths. These are truths that the broader world has often overlooked.

This essay focuses on the critical narrative concerning the Tree of Life (ToL) in the Garden of Eden. It addresses a central paradox that demands careful consideration. Why did Hashem create a Tree that was initially available? Why did it ultimately become off-limits to Adam?

The Garden of Eden is depicted as the ultimate ecosystem. It features lush rivers and a living breeze. At its center is the Tree of Life itself. It is described with its vibrant leaves, sturdy branches, thick trunk, and fruits that seemingly glow with promise. Our critical research shows that in the beginning, this Tree was the undeniable heart of the Garden.

The relationship between Adam and the Tree of Life was established through a clear, unequivocal Divine command. Hasham instructed Adam: “Of every tree of the garden, you may freely eat”. Crucially, the sources confirm that this universal permission extended specifically to the Tree of Life. The purpose of this initial, unrestricted access was monumental. Eating its fruit was meant to grant immortality. It allowed the seeker to “partake and live forever”.

This fundamental understanding establishes a core theological principle. The potential for eternal life was not contingent on a subsequent event or intervention. It was the original, established, and freely offered gift of creation. The Tree of Life was thus created not as a test of obedience. Instead, it was the very mechanism of everlasting existence.

This knowledge anchors our response to the essay’s central question: Why create a permissible tree that later became forbidden? The creation of the Tree of Life proves that Hashem initially intended for humanity to have perpetual life. His project design included immortal life. The Tree was established as the primary source of that enduring existence.

The prohibition against eating from the Tree of Life was enforced after Adam’s transgression. This transgression involved the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. This event does not retroactively negate the reason for its creation. Instead, the boundary shows the immediate consequence of the initial error. It demonstrates the profound consequence of the removal of the ultimate gift of immortality, which was unconditional. The Tree was not created to be off-limits; it became off-limits because the state of perfection needed to enjoy its benefits had been forfeited.

This sequence provides a robust platform for theological inquiry. The presence and original permission granted to the Tree of Life underscore that the gift of immortality was foundational and inherent to humanity’s initial relationship with the Creator. This research confirms that the pathway to eternal life was present and available from the start. This is a key principle noted in associated research available via resources like Esnoga Beit HaShoavah.

——————————————————————————–

Footnotes

Excerpts from “TheTree.mp4ofLife.mp4”: Sages have delved into Torah, revealing truths. The Garden of Eden features the tree of life at the center, described with vibrant leaves, sturdy branches, thick trunk, and glowing fruits. Hasham commanded Adam, “Of every tree of the garden, you may freely eat,” which included the Tree of Life granting immortality, enabling one to “partake and live forever.” This information is relevant to the study of the Tree of Life.

The Lamb of God in Exodus: A Jewish Perspective Rooted in Tradition

For over 3,350 years, Jewish tradition has preserved a powerful narrative about the lamb in the Exodus story—a narrative starkly different from the Christian and Messianic interpretation that identifies Jesus (Yeshua) as the “Lamb of God.” Christians assert that the Passover lamb prefigures Jesus’ sacrificial death, drawing a typological link between the lamb’s blood in Exodus and salvation through Christ. In contrast, Jewish oral tradition, as recorded in the Midrash, Talmud, Mishnah, and Zohar, teaches that the lamb was not a symbol of redemption in the Christian sense but rather the god of the Egyptians, which the Israelites killed to affirm their loyalty to Hashem. This essay explores this Jewish understanding, rooted in the events of the Exodus, and highlights the divergence in oral traditions surrounding Passover.

The Lamb as Egypt’s God: A Test of Faith

The story of the Passover lamb begins in Exodus 12:3-6, where Hashem commands the Israelites: “Speak to all the congregation of Israel, saying: ‘On the tenth day of this month every man shall take for himself a lamb… and you shall keep it until the fourteenth day of the month… and kill it at twilight.’” For Jews, this act was not merely a ritual prelude to liberation but a radical rejection of Egyptian idolatry. The Midrash, specifically Shemot Rabbah 16:2, explains that the Egyptians worshipped the lamb as a deity, often associated with the zodiac sign Aries or gods like Khnum, the ram-headed creator. By taking and slaughtering this lamb—publicly, before Egyptian eyes—the Israelites defied their oppressors’ religion, proving their exclusive devotion to Hashem.

The Talmud amplifies this interpretation. In Shabbat 87b, it notes that the 10th of Nisan, when the lambs were selected, fell on a Shabbat that year, making the act a double affirmation of faith: honoring Shabbat while rejecting idolatry. The Tosafot (medieval Talmudic commentators) add that this provoked the Egyptian firstborn, who questioned their parents’ inaction as their sacred animal was prepared for slaughter. This aligns with Exodus 8:26, where Moses tells Pharaoh, “It would not be right to do so, for the offerings we shall sacrifice to the Lord our God are an abomination (to‘evat) to the Egyptians. If we sacrifice offerings abominable to the Egyptians before their eyes, will they not stone us?” Here, to‘evah (abomination) suggests something taboo or sacred to Egypt, not merely repulsive, reinforcing the lamb’s divine status in their culture.

Stone Us!

For 3,350 years, Jewish oral tradition has framed this slaughter as an act of obedience, not atonement. The Mishnah Pesachim 10:5 details the Passover sacrifice’s meticulous execution, emphasizing its role as a communal affirmation of the covenant with Hashem. Unlike the Christian view of a sin-offering lamb, the Jewish Korban Pesach (Passover offering) was a celebration of liberation, not a mechanism for forgiveness. The Zohar (Bo 36b) adds a mystical layer, suggesting the lamb’s blood on the doorposts symbolized the destruction of Egypt’s spiritual power, channeling divine judgment against their gods, as stated in Exodus 12:12: “I will execute judgment against all the gods of Egypt.”

Rashi, the 11th-century commentator, ties this to Exodus 12:23, noting that the blood was a sign for the Israelites—not to appease God, but to mark their allegiance amid divine wrath. The Mechilta de’Rabbi Ishmael (a halakhic midrash on Exodus) further stresses that the command to kill the lamb tested the Israelites’ courage after centuries of enslavement, asking: Would they risk Egyptian retaliation to obey Hashem? This narrative, preserved orally since 1313 BCE and later written in these sources, underscores a triumph over idolatry, not a prefiguration of a savior.

The Christian Claim: Jesus as the Passover Lamb

In contrast, Christians and Messianics interpret the Passover lamb through a lens absent from Jewish tradition. The New Testament, particularly John 1:29 (“Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world”) and 1 Corinthians 5:7 (“For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed”), casts Jesus as the ultimate sacrificial lamb. This draws on the timing of his crucifixion during Passover and the idea of his blood redeeming humanity, akin to the lamb’s blood sparing the Israelites. The Book of Revelation 5:6 reinforces this with the image of a slain lamb, linking it to atonement—a concept foreign to the Jewish Korban Pesach.

This interpretation emerged centuries after the Exodus, rooted in Christian theology rather than the Jewish oral tradition present at the event. While Jews see the lamb as a historical and cultural defiance of Egypt, Christians overlay a typological framework, retroactively assigning messianic significance. Jewish tradition, however, knows no such figure in the Passover narrative—our redemption came through Hashem alone, not a mediator.

The Oral Tradition Divide

The Jewish oral tradition, codified in the Talmud, Midrash, and beyond, reflects what “Jews have known and taught since going out of Egypt”—that the lamb was a means to an end, not an end itself. The Tanchuma (Bo 4) recounts how the Israelites’ act shattered Egyptian morale, fulfilling Exodus 11:7: “But against any of the children of Israel not a dog shall sharpen its tongue.” This was about divine supremacy, not substitutionary sacrifice. Conversely, Christian oral tradition, developing post-Second Temple, reimagines Passover as a shadow of Christ’s mission, a narrative absent from the Jewish experience of the original event.

The Sfat Emet (19th-century Hasidic commentary) ties the lamb to Shabbat HaGadol—the Shabbat before Passover—calling it the moment Jews first observed Shabbat by rejecting Egypt’s gods, a national coming-of-age. No hint of a messianic lamb appears here or in earlier sources like the Mishnah or Gemara. For Jews, the Exodus lamb remains a historical symbol of liberation and loyalty, not a theological precursor to a figure 1,300 years later.

Conclusion: Two Lambs, Two Truths

For 3,350 years, Jewish tradition has held that the Passover lamb was the Egyptian god, killed to prove obedience to Hashem—a story of defiance and deliverance preserved in our oral law. Christians see a different lamb, one tied to Jesus and atonement, a perspective born from a later tradition. The Exodus pictures—lambs selected, slain, and marked on doorposts—tell a Jewish story of faith in action, not foreshadowing. As the Midrash, Talmud, and Zohar affirm, our lamb was no savior; it was a statement: Hashem alone is God.

The Gift of Choice

A New Look at Adam and Eve in the Garden

By [Gavriel ben David]


The story of Adam and Eve in the Torah is one we think we know: a paradise lost, a forbidden fruit, a fall from grace. But what if we’ve missed the deeper invitation woven into the very first commandment God gave humanity? Recently, Rabbi David Fohrman and Rabbi Friedman have offered a fresh lens on Genesis 2–3, turning the narrative upside down. They suggest that the command to eat from all the trees—except one—wasn’t a setup for failure, but a divine gift: the gift of choice, the seed of gratitude, and a path to trust in Hashem. Let’s explore this idea, drawing from Torah, Midrash, and Talmud, to see how Eden wasn’t about restriction, but about freedom.

The Commandment That Opens the World

Genesis 2:16–17 reads: “And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, ‘From all the trees of the garden you may freely eat; but from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil you shall not eat, for on the day you eat from it, you will surely die.’” At first glance, it’s a warning, a boundary. But Rabbi Fohrman asks us to pause: Why focus on the “no” when the “yes” comes first? God doesn’t just permit eating; He commands it—achol tochal, “you shall surely eat.” Every tree is a gift, described as “pleasant to the sight and good for food” (Gen. 2:9). The Garden bursts with abundance, and Adam and Eve are invited to partake.


 “A world of abundance gifted by Hashem.”


This isn’t a passive allowance; it’s an active call. Midrash Rabbah (Bereishit 15:7) expands this, noting that the trees weren’t just food but symbols of divine generosity—each one unique, a testament to Hashem’s creativity. The Talmud (Berachot 58a) echoes this gratitude: “One who enjoys something of this world without a blessing, it’s as if he steals from God.” In Eden, eating was meant to teach Adam and Eve to say “thank You”—to recognize every bite as from Hashem.


The Tree That Belonged to Hashem


Then there’s the exception: the Tree of Knowledge, off-limits, belonging solely to God. Rabbi Friedman might frame this as a deliberate contrast—not to tempt, but to define. If all trees are gifts, this one’s exclusion creates a boundary, a space where Adam and Eve can say “no” back to God. Without it, they’d be like angels, or, as Rabbi Fohrman puts it, “old computers”—programmed to obey, input yielding output, no room for will. The Midrash (Bereishit Rabbah 19:3) hints at this: “Why was it called the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil? Because it gave the power to choose between them.” Choice didn’t exist until that tree stood apart.


“Hashem’s tree, the root of human freedom.”


The Talmud (Shabbat 55b) wrestles with human agency: “Everything is in the hands of Heaven except the fear of Heaven.” Eden’s design mirrors this—Hashem hands over the world, but keeps one tree to teach trust. Eating everywhere else was saying, “I trust Your gifts.” Touching that tree was questioning, “Do I need more?”

Here’s where it gets profound. Rabbi Fohrman suggests Eden wasn’t about perfection without choice—it was about planting the seeds of relationship. Angels don’t choose; they serve. Humans, though, can turn to Hashem out of love, not just duty. The command to eat was a lesson in gratitude: every fruit a reminder that “this is from You, God.” The Tree of Knowledge, left untouched, was trust: “I don’t need to take what’s Yours—I have enough.”

The Midrash (Bereishit Rabbah 16:5) imagines God showing Adam the Garden, saying, “All this I made for you.” It’s a parent handing a child a feast, leaving one dish aside—not to tease, but to teach appreciation. When Eve, then Adam, eat from that tree (Gen. 3:6), it’s not just disobedience—it’s a break in trust, a grab for control. Yet even then, Hashem’s response (clothing them, Gen. 3:21) shows mercy, a chance to rebuild that bond.


“The moment trust faltered.”


Beyond Eden: Choosing Like Humans, Not Angels


So why does this matter? Rabbi Friedman might say it’s our story too. We’re not in Eden, but we face trees daily—choices between taking and trusting. The Talmud (Avodah Zarah 3a) teaches, “Greater is one who is commanded and fulfills than one who isn’t commanded and fulfills.” Why? Because choice makes obedience meaningful. Angels can’t grow; we can. Eden wasn’t a trap—it was a classroom.

“Our Eden today: choosing gratitude.”


This reading flips the script. The first commandment wasn’t about saying “no” to sin—it was about saying “yes” to Hashem’s world, learning to thank Him, trusting Him. The Tree of Knowledge wasn’t a curse, but a gift of freedom, mishandled but not irredeemable. As we reflect on Adam and Eve, let’s ask: How do we choose? Do we eat from the gifts with thanks, or reach for what’s not ours?

Reincarnation


@haemeth42

3 months agowhen I first heard this topic from Rabbi Mizrachi i was so amazed. Todah Rabbi for explaining this topic

37

Reply

@4951wolcott

3 months agoMr. Palvanov illuminates yet another subject of curiosity with the breadth of sources and penetrating insights that characterize his talks.

32

Reply

@raf_abreu

3 months agoWe are blessed to have a teacher like Efraim! Thank you again for all your wonderful lectures and all the efforts in teaching us the Emet of the Torah! Baruch HaShem!

65

Reply

·

11 replies

@raychingcar7881

3 months agoThe love of HaShem for His children is unmatched.

27

Reply

1 reply

@gavrielgoldstein

3 months agoRabbi I love how you strive to bring us back to the way judaism was meant to be understood. If only all Rabbis shared the same wisdom as you. You remind me that Judaism is not a religion like we are taught to believe nowadays but rather life itself and the way in which we should live.

Jonathan Pollard and Rabbi David Bar-Hayim: Day 55

Machon Shilo

Stopping Jordanian Military Provocations on the Border:

To watch a discussion between Jonathan Pollard and Rabbi David Bar-Hayim on the issue of innocent civilians and collateral damage please go to the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW1FZ… Please subscribe to the Machon Shilo channel and on Rumble at: https://rumble.com/c/MachonShilo Visit us at www.MachonShilo.org Want to get involved in Machon Shilo activities in your local area and meet like-minded people?

Please fill out the following quick questionnaire: https://tinyurl.com/jfbue98v Want to receive updates regarding Machon Shilo activities? Join a Machon Shilo updates group on Whatsapp or Telegram at the following links: https://chat.whatsapp.com/DHZj2jzzRjV…https://t.me/joinchat/V0OnDqXb3PuctB

What is True Strength? | Parshat Toldot | Into the Verse Podcast

Aleph Beta

Every shabbat, I look forward to “Into The Verse,” the new revelation I will receive from the Torah and the scholars at Aleph Beta, and the excellent commentary it provides within itself.

Rabbi Forhman often suggests, what if there was a book that contained all the answers to the stories the Torah lays out before us? How much would you pay for it?

I can not tell you the connection between the intertextual method Aleph Beta uses to reveal the love of Hashem in our lives as human beings and Jews. Aleph Beta has caused my relationship with Hashem to grow beyond measure. I thank Hashem daily for the Torah scholars He shares with us. May Hashem bless Rabbi David Forhman and his Aleph Beta family to prosper in all their endeavors.

END OF DAYS- BOOK OF DANIEL -CHATAM SOFER DATE –

IN BIBLE CODE -PROFESSOR HARALICK RABBI GLAZERSON

Psalm 43

1Avenge me, O God, and plead my cause against an unkind nation, from a man of deceit and injustice You shall rescue me. אשָׁפְטֵ֚נִי אֱלֹהִ֨ים | וְרִֽ֘יבָ֚ה רִיבִ֗י מִגּ֣וֹי לֹ֣א חָסִ֑יד מֵ֚אִ֥ישׁ מִרְמָ֖ה וְעַוְלָ֣ה תְפַלְּטֵֽנִי:
2For You are the God of my strength, why have You abandoned me? Why should I walk in gloom under the oppression of the enemy. בכִּֽי־אַתָּ֨ה | אֱלֹהֵ֣י מָֽעוּזִּי֘ לָמָ֪ה זְנַ֫חְתָּ֥נִי לָֽמָּה־קֹדֵ֥ר אֶתְהַלֵּ֗ךְ בְּלַ֣חַץ אוֹיֵֽב:
3Send Your light and Your truth, that they may lead me; they shall bring me to Your Holy Mount and to Your dwellings. גשְׁלַח־אֽוֹרְךָ֣ וַֽ֖אֲמִתְּךָ הֵ֣מָּה יַנְח֑וּנִי יְבִיא֥וּנִי אֶל־הַר־קָדְשְׁךָ֗ וְאֶל־מִשְׁכְּנוֹתֶֽיךָ: