All posts by adongabriel

A Letter from a Kohen to Kohen: A Letter from One Kohen to Another: Why I Cannot Accept the New Testament

My fellow descendant of Aaron,

We both carry the same unbreakable covenant:

“You and your sons with you shall keep your priesthood. It is an eternal covenant of salt before Hashem to you and your descendants” (Numbers 18:7,19).

No verse in Tanakh ever says this covenant will end. No prophet ever said a new non-Levitical priesthood would replace us. Yet the New Testament claims exactly that. Here, plainly and with love, is why I, a Kohen still standing at the altar of Torah, must reject it.

1. Melchizedek Is Shem’s Son of Noah – Not a New Priesthood

Every major Jewish source identifies Melchizedek with Shem:

  • Talmud Nedarim 32b
  • Targum Yonatan Genesis 14:18
  • Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, Radak
  • Rabbi Efraim Palvanov (Mayim Achronim)

Shem was still alive, righteous, and served as Kohen before Matan Torah. There is no prophecy that his priesthood would one day supersede Aaron’s. Psalm 110:4 (“You are a Kohen forever according to the order of Malkizedek”) refers to the future Mashiach ben David who will have certain priestly functions – while the sons of Aaron continue offering sacrifices forever (Ezekiel 44–46; Jeremiah 33:18–22).

2. The Claim That Aaron’s Priesthood Is “Temporary” Contradicts Torah

Hebrews 7 declares Aaron’s priesthood “weak,” “mortal,” and “imperfect,” needing replacement. The Torah calls it חֹק עוֹלָם – an eternal statute that stands as long as heaven and earth (Jeremiah 33:20-21; Malachi 2:4-8). Show me one verse in all of Tanakh that says the covenant with Levi will be broken. There is none.

3. Jeremiah’s “New Covenant” Is NOT the New Testament

Jeremiah 31:31-34 speaks of a renewed covenant written on the heart. Read the very next verses (31:35-37): Israel will cease to be a nation only when sun, moon, and stars cease. The same prophet repeats in 33:17-22 that both the Davidic throne and the Levitical priesthood will last forever. The “new covenant” is the same Torah internalized in the Messianic era – not a new religion that abolishes Shabbat, kashrut, or the Temple service.

4. The Chiastic Structure of Genesis 14 & 2 Samuel 24 Needs No New Testament

Rabbi Efraim Palvanov (timestamp 56:42) shows the perfect chiasm between Avraham meeting Malkizedek and David meeting Araunah:

| A | War → Plague | B | Victory → Repentance | X | Priest-king of Shalem bows & offers bread-wine / threshing floor | B’ | Avraham refuses spoils → David insists on paying | A’ | Eternal altar established on the Foundation Stone |

This chiasm closes inside Tanakh. The sparks of Shem → Malkizedek → Araunah → Mashiach are all within the Jewish doctrine of gilgulim taught by the Zohar and the Ari – no outside book required.

5. Every “Proof Text” Collapses Under Hebrew Scrutiny

  • Isaiah 7:14 → a young woman (almah) giving birth in Ahaz’s days, not a virgin
  • Isaiah 53 → the servant is explicitly Israel (see 41:8, 44:1, 49:3)
  • Psalm 22 → David describing his own suffering
  • Daniel 9 → the “anointed one cut off” is the last Jewish king, not a crucifixion

The list goes on. I have the receipts in the original Hebrew.

My Brother, the Altar Still Burns

Our job as Kohanim is to keep the fire alive until Mashiach comes – a Torah-observant king from the seed of David who will rebuild the Temple and cause the Kohanim to once again offer korbanot “according to the Torah of Moshe” (Ezekiel 43-46).

Until that day I remain in the same service Pinchas and Elazar kept.

With deepest respect and love from one Kohen to another,

Chazzan Gavriel ben David, still guarding the eternal covenant of salt.

Return to the Rock: What Did Adam Really Look Like According to the Torah?

Adam and Eve the Light

Every Christian knows the words of Yeshua: “Whoever builds on sand will fall. Whoever builds on the Rock will stand.”

But which Rock? The Torah declares again and again: “He is the Rock, His work is perfect… The Rock that bore you… Their Rock is not like our Rock” (Deuteronomy 32:4, 18, 31)

Only the Torah stood in Gan Eden. Only the Torah saw Adam before the sin. The Torah has guarded the true answer for 3,327 years. It did so with the living chain of Jewish tradition. This happened before a single page of the New Testament existed.

Let the Rock speak.

1. Adam Was Formed from the Temple Mount Itself

“And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground (adamah)” (Genesis 2:7)

The Midrash (Pirkei d’Rabbi Eliezer 12, Zohar I:34b) teaches: Hashem took that dust from the exact location. It was from the future Altar of Atonement. It is the Foundation Stone (Even ha-Shetiyyah) on Mount Moriah. That is the same stone David bought from Araunah the Jebusite (2 Samuel 24). It is also the stone on which the Holy of Holies was built.

Adam was literally created from the Rock.

2. Adam Was Originally Male and Female in One Body

“Male and female He created them… and He called their name Adam” (Genesis 5:2)

Talmud (Berachot 61a, Eruvin 18a) and Zohar explain: The first human being was androgynous. It was one creature with two faces, joined back-to-back. Only later did Hashem cast a deep sleep upon Adam and separate Chavah (Eve) from his side (tzela).

The original Adam perfectly reflected the absolute Unity of the One God who has no division.

3. Adam Was Clothed in Primordial Light – Not Skin

Before the sin the Torah uses the word אוֹר (Ohr = Light). After the sin it writes עוֹר (ʿOr = skin) with an ʿayin (Genesis 3:21).

This is the open teaching of:

  • Zohar
  • Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto
  • The Vilna Gaon
  • Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan
  • Rabbi Akiva Tatz
  • Rabbi Efraim Palvanov (see timestamp 1:14 in his Jerusalem lecture)

Adam’s “garments” were pure Ohr Ein Sof – Infinite Divine Light. His body was translucent, radiant, glowing with the Shechinah itself. The Talmud states his heel alone outshone the sun (Chullin 60b). His stature reached from earth to the heavens (Chagigah 12a).

That is what Adam really looked like.

4. Our Eternal Mission: Turn Skin Back into Light

Hashem placed Adam in the Garden “to work it and to guard it” (l’ovdah u’l’shomrah – Genesis 2:15). Those exact words are used only one other place in the entire Torah. They describe the service of the Kohanim and Levi’im in the Mishkan and Temple (Numbers 3:7-8, 8:26, 18:5-6).

Adam was creation’s first High Priest. Every mitzvah we perform adds another thread of light. Every Shabbat we keep does the same. Every act of kindness contributes even more. Eventually, the entire world becomes the Garden once again.

A Loving Challenge to My Christian Friends

You say you build your house on the Rock. Then why do you ignore the Rock’s own description of Adam? Why do you accept 300–400 “fulfilled prophecies” that collapse the moment you read the Hebrew context?

We have the receipts:

  • Isaiah 7:14 – almah = young woman, not virgin; prophecy given to King Ahaz in his lifetime
  • Isaiah 53 – the suffering servant is explicitly named “Israel” and “Jacob” in the surrounding chapters
  • Psalm 22 – David’s own words about his persecution
  • Zechariah 12:10 – mourning for the fallen of Megiddo, not a crucifixion

The Torah never speaks of a divine man-God, never abolishes itself, never transfers the eternal covenants.

The Rock has never moved.

Come Home to the Real Adam

Leave the shifting sand of later interpretations. Come stand with the Jewish people on the Rock that bore Adam from its very dust.

Together – Jews keeping 613, righteous Gentiles keeping the 7 Noahide laws – we will clothe this dark world in light again, until:

“The earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of Hashem as the waters cover the sea.” (Habakkuk 2:14)

May we merit to see the day. Every human being will shine with the same primordial light. This light once clothed Adam.

With boundless love from a Jew still guarding the same Torah his fathers received at Sinai,

Chazzan Gavriel ben David

Shabbat Was Never Just for the Jews – It Was Given to All the Children of Noah

Shabbat for all mankind

Most Jews will tell you a non-Jew is not allowed to keep Shabbat. Most Christians will tell you the Sabbath was nailed to the cross and replaced by Sunday. Most Muslims will tell you the real Shabbat is Friday.

All three are wrong. The proof is hidden in plain sight. It lies in the mirror between the Seven Days of Creation and the Seven Stages of the Flood.

Rabbi David Fohrman explains in his breathtaking Aleph Beta series “Noah & the Flood: The Second Creation.” He argues that the entire Flood narrative is a deliberate replay of Genesis 1. However, this time, the world is re-created for all of people, not just Israel.

Day of CreationGenesis 1Flood ParallelWho Receives the Sign?
Day 1 – Light / Darkness“Let there be light” – Spirit hovers over the face of the watersGenesis 8:1 – “A wind from God hovered over the face of the waters” – total darkness, voidAll living creatures
Day 2 – Separation of watersFirmament separates waters from watersWaters above and below separated again
Day 3 – Dry land & vegetationDry land appears, seed-bearing plantsDove returns with olive leaf – first sign of dry land and vegetation
Day 4 – Sun, moon, stars for seasons“For signs and for seasons”Genesis 8:22 – “Seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter… shall not cease” – the rainbow covenantAll descendants of Noah
Day 5 – Birds & sea creatures“Let the waters swarm… let birds fly”First to leave the ark: creeping things, birds, swarming creatures
Day 6 – Land animals & manBeasts, cattle, and man in God’s image – “Be fruitful and multiply”Animals leave, then Noah’s family – but they separate (violating “be fruitful”)
Day 7 – God rests“God blessed the seventh day and made it holy”Genesis 9 – Rainbow covenant: “I will establish My covenant with you and all flesh” – an eternal signEvery human being

The rainbow is the ot — the eternal sign — of the seventh day for all the children of Noah. And the last time I checked, every male on earth descends from Shem, Ham, or Japheth — Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson’s Y-chromosome research in Traced proves it.

Charlie Kirk, in his book Real Citizenship, writes: “God gave the rainbow as a universal covenant. It was not given to one nation, but to every living creature. The Sabbath rest was baked into that covenant before Sinai ever happened.”

Yet today: • Some rabbis declare a gentile may not keep Shabbat (a tragic over-correction against missionary theft). • Christians move the day to Sunday — the only day in Creation week never called “good.” • Muslims change it to Friday, which is Day Six. This day represents the beast and man’s animal nature. It is also the very day the Torah warns against murder (Sixth Commandment).

We sing every Shabbat morning in VeShamru. This passage is found in Exodus 31:16–17: וְשָׁמְרוּ בְנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת־הַשַּׁבָּת… כִּי אוֹת הִיא בֵּינִי וּבֵין בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לְעֹלָם. “The children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath.” It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel forever.

But read the Hebrew carefully — the word בֵּינִי (“between Me”) appears twice in the Torah:

  1. Exodus 31 — between God and Israel
  2. Genesis 9 — the rainbow between God and all flesh that is on the earth

Two covenants, one sign.

Rabbi Fohrman’s conclusion is shattering: The Flood was not destruction — it was re-creation. And the seventh day of that re-creation was given as a gift and responsibility to every human being alive.

So who is right about Shabbat? No religion today. The Torah is.

Shabbat was never taken from the nations — it was stolen by bad theology and fear.

The rainbow still hangs in the sky every seventh day, whispering the same promise it whispered to Noah:

Rest. Remember who made you. Because the world depends on it.

The children of Noah must learn to rest together on the day God actually blessed. They include Jews, Christians, Muslim, and everyone else. Until they do, the Flood’s waters of chaos will keep rising.

Related essays on beithashoavah.org • Essay 4 – The Fourth Commandment in Toldot: The First Shabbat in Exile. Why Does God Play Favorites? The Silence Cain Heard Wrong • The Rainbow Covenant Science Cannot Erase (Dr. Jeanson & Genesis 9)

Shabbat Shalom — to all the children of Noah, [Your Name] Kohen, descendant of Aaron Beit HaShoavah – Return, Repent, Rejoice

(Publish this as a separate post — it’s too explosive to bury. Link it right after Essay 4 with: “And if you think Shabbat belongs only to the Jews… read this.”)

The Fourth Commandment in Toldot: “Stay With Laban a Few Days” – The First Shabbat in Exile

fourth-commandment-in-toldot-shabbat-exile.jpg

Most people think the Sabbath commandment began with thunder and smoke at Sinai.

It didn’t.

It began with a terrified Jewish boy running for his life and his mother whispering the Fourth Commandment in Toldot:

“Stay with Laban a few days until your brother’s fury subsides.” (Genesis 27:44)

Rabbi David Fohrman reveals the exact Hebrew parallel:

Sinai (Exodus 20:8–11)Toldot (Genesis 27:44)
זָכוֹר אֶת־יוֹם הַשַּׁבָּת לְקַדְּשׁוֹ “Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy”שֵׁב יָמִים אֲחָדִים עַד אֲשֶׁר־תָּשׁוּב חֲמַת אָחִיךָ “Stay a few days until your brother’s anger subsides”

The phrase יָמִים אֲחָדִים (“a few days”) is the Torah’s coded language for Shabbat rest in exile.

Why? Because the only other time the Torah uses “a few days” in this exact context is when Pharaoh refuses to let Israel rest, and God answers with the plagues and the very first Shabbat in history (Exodus 5:3 → 7-day cycle). “A few days” = the sacred pause before redemption.

Rivkah is not just giving travel advice. She is commanding Jacob to observe the first Shabbat in exile — to stop running, to rest, to let God fight the battle while he waits.

This is the Fourth Commandment in Toldot: When the world is burning with Esau’s rage, the Jewish response is not more action — it is holy waiting.

Why This Matters for Jewish Chosenness

Every time Christianity or Islam claims the Torah’s commandments while rejecting the Jewish people, they violate the Fourth Commandment in Toldot.

They refuse to “stay a few days” — to pause, to rest, to let the Jewish people carry the burden of exile while the nations rage.

But the Torah says the Sabbath belongs to the family that was told to rest first — in a tent in Beersheba, centuries before Sinai.

As Rabbi Dr. Akiva Tatz teaches: “The Jewish people keep Shabbat, and Shabbat keeps the Jewish people.”

  • Essay 1: The Ten Commandments in Toldot – They Began with Rivkah, Not Sinai
  • Essay 2: The Second Commandment in Toldot – Esau’s Rage and “No Other Gods”
  • Essay 3: The Third Commandment in Toldot – “Why Should I Lose Both of You in One Day?”
  • Why Does God Play Favorites? The Silence Cain Heard Wrong

Next in this 10-part series: Essay 5 – The Fifth Commandment in Toldot: Honoring the Mother Who Risked Everything

Shabbat Shalom from Synagogue Beit HaShoavah who learned to rest in exile, [Chazzan Gavriel ben David] Beit HaShoavah – Return, Repent, Rejoice https://beithashoavah.org

Isaac Returns: Samson as the Akedah Hero Defeating Philistines in Gaza Today

isaac-returns-samson-gaza.jpg

Last week’s Torah reading, Parashat Toldot, left one thread dangling: Isaac. Who is Isaac, really? Isaac is more than just the bound boy on Moriah. He is the eternal symbol of resurrection. He is the son Hashem provides from the past to redeem the future.

As Ephraim Palanov teaches in his visionary lectures, Isaac returns Samson. Samson is the Nazirite judge whose life mirrors the Akedah in a stunning chiastic structure. He rises to shatter Philistine strongholds in Gaza. Modern echoes of this story resound today.

Imagine this: I sit with Martin, a Christian friend who’s heard it all before. “You Jews did wrong,” he says, “and God rejected you.” I nod—Hashem wrote it plainly through Moshe Rabbenu. Judges 13:1 makes it clear. “The people of Israel again did what was evil in the sight of the LORD.” The LORD gave them into the hand of the Philistines for forty years. (וַיֹּסִ֨פוּ֙ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לַעֲשֹׂ֥ות הָרַ֖ע בְּעֵינֵ֣י יְהוָ֑ה וַיִּתְּנֵ֧ם יְהוָ֛ה בְּיַד־פְּלִשְׁתִּ֖ים אַרְבָּעִ֥ים שָׁנָֽה׃). We know our sins. But then I say, “Martin, I can prove Hashem wrote the Torah in under five minutes. It’s math—divine math that measures the world.”

I point to Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson’s Traced: Human DNA’s Big Surprise, peer-reviewed work from Answers in Genesis. Jeanson maps Y-DNA haplogroups to biblical patriarchs, showing modern men descend from three “fathers”: Shem, Ham, and Japheth—Noah’s sons. But zoom in: Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob form a precise lineage in haplogroup T. This lineage is traceable through mutations. These mutations align exactly with Genesis timelines. How did a shepherd 3,300 years ago encode this? The Torah isn’t myth; it’s a genetic blueprint, proving Hashem’s authorship like E=mc² proves physics. Without our family—Abraham’s seed—your history crumbles. Christians and Muslims quote our verses, but reject the album they’re printed in.

The Torah as Family Album:

Don’t Rewrite Our Pictures

Picture this: You invite me to your home, pull out your family album. We flip to a photo—your grandfather at war, strong, unyielding. I grab it and say, “No, he was weak; your line ended there.” You’d snatch it back, heartbroken. That’s what replacement theology does to us. The Tanakh is Klal Israel’s album: snapshots of triumphs, failures, redemptions. Samson isn’t a fairy tale; he’s a page from Isaac’s chapter, chiastically mirrored to prove Hashem’s promise endures.

In Toldot, Isaac is עקידה (akedah)—bound, silent, offered. Genesis 22: “Take your son, your only son Isaac” (קַח־נָא אֶת־בִּנְךָ אֶת־יְחִידְךָ אֵת אִיִּדְךָ). The knife descends; an angel halts it. Isaac lives, but the near-death echoes eternity. Fast-forward to Shoftim (Judges): Samson, the barren-born Nazirite (like Isaac to Sarah), embodies that akedah in reverse chiastic glory. Ephraim Palanov, in his prophetic teachings, sees Samson as Isaac reborn—Hashem pulling him from history’s grave to judge Philistines, those eternal jealous Cains haunting Gaza.

Chiastic Mirrors:

Hebrew Words Binding Isaac and Samson

The Tanakh’s genius? Chiastic structures—ABCDCBA symmetries where the center (D) pivots revelation. Isaac’s akedah and Samson’s saga interlock like gears in Hashem’s clock. Let’s unpack the Hebrew parallels, drawn from the stories’ linguistic DNA.

A: Barren Womb, Divine Promise Isaac: Sarah’s barrenness (עֲקָרָה, akarah—Genesis 11:30). Hashem promises: “Sarah will bear a son” (יֹלֵד תֵּלֵד בֵּן, Genesis 18:10). Samson: Manoah’s wife barren (עֲקָרָה, Judges 13:2). Angel echoes: “You will conceive and bear a son” (הָרָה תַּהַרִי וְיָלַדְתְּ בֵּן, Judges 13:3). Same root: הרה (harah)—conception as miracle. Chiastic pivot: From sterility to seed, Hashem chooses the impossible.

B: Binding Vows and Tests Isaac: Bound on the altar (וַיַּעַקְדוּ אֶת־יִצְחָק, vayya’akdu et-Yitzchak—Genesis 22:9). עקד (aked)—to bind, echoing akarah. Samson: Nazirite vow binds him (נָזִיר אֱלֹהִים, nazir Elohim—Judges 13:5). His life a test: Delilah’s “Tell me” (הַגִּידָה לִּי, haggidah li—Judges 16:6) mirrors Abraham’s silence. Hebrew twist: Samson’s locks (נֵזֶר, nezer—crown of binding) fall, unbound like Isaac’s ram-horn echo.

C: Philistine Jealousy as Cain’s Rage Isaac: Abimelech’s men envy wells (וַיִּקְנְאוּ, vayyikne’u—Genesis 26:14). Philistines fill them with dirt—jealousy like Cain’s (קַיִן, kayin—root of acquisition/envy). Samson: Philistines rage at his riddles, weddings (וַיִּחֲרוּ, vayyicharu—burn with anger, Judges 14:19). Gaza today? Same soil, same seething—Philistines reborn in jealousy, listening to emotions over Hashem. As in Toldot’s Esau (red Esau, אֱדוֹם—root of blood rage), they covet the blessing.

D: The Center—Resurrection and Redemption Here the chiasm peaks: Isaac “dies” on the altar, rises redeemed (ram provided, אַיִּל, ayil—Genesis 22:13). Samson, blinded in Gaza, prays: “Let me die with the Philistines” (תֵּת־נָא מוֹתִי, tet-na moti—Judges 16:30). He pushes pillars (עַמּוּדִים, ammudim), temple crashes—killing more in death than life. Hebrew gem: שִׁמְשׁוֹן (Shimshon—“sun-like”) rises at dawn in Gaza (עַזָּה, Azza—“strong”), illuminating akedah’s light. Ephraim Palanov nails it: Isaac’s near-sacrifice births Samson’s final stand—Hashem resurrects the bound son to unbind Israel.

C’: Reversal—Defeating the Jealous Samson burns Philistine fields (וַיִּדְלַק, vayyidalak—Judges 15:5), avenging envy. Isaac re-digs wells (וַיִּגְלֶה, vayyigleh—Genesis 26:18), claiming inheritance. Cain’s dirt-filling reversed: Life from “death.”

B’: Unbinding and Legacy Samson’s hair regrows (וַיִּצְמַח, vayyitzmach—Judges 16:22); unbound, he redeems. Isaac sires twins (וַיִּוָּלֵד, vayyivaled—Genesis 25:26), unbound from barrenness.

A’: Fertile Legacy, Eternal Seed Samson’s line ends childless, but his death seeds Israel’s freedom. Isaac’s seed: Jacob/Israel, the chosen (יַעֲקֹב אֲשֶׁר בָּחַרְתִּיךָ, Ya’akov asher bacharticha—Isaiah 41:8). Full circle: From one barren womb to a nation.

This isn’t coincidence; it’s Hashem’s math—chiastic proof the stories interweave like DNA strands. Videos like Rabbi Fohrman’s Aleph Beta on Samson unpack the vow’s echoes of Isaac’s silence, while deeper dives reveal Gaza’s gates as modern akedah pillars.

Hashem’s Love:

Stronger Than Philistine Rage

To Christians and Muslims: You misuse Isaiah 53—“Who has believed what he has heard from us?… He will surprise many nations. Kings will be silenced because of him” (Isaiah 52:15)—claiming it’s Jesus or Muhammad, not Israel’s remnant. But verse 13 clarifies this important point. “The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity, nor speak lies. Neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth” (Zephaniah 3:13, שְׁאֵרִית יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא־יַעֲשׂוּ עַוְלָה). No deceit—like the Servant with “no deceit in his mouth” (Isaiah 53:9). That’s us, Klal Israel, the light without guile.

Jeremiah 31:3 whispers Hashem’s vow: “With an everlasting love I have loved you” (בְּאַהֲבַת עוֹלָם אֲהַבְתִּיךָ). His words grow truer daily—from Sinai’s thunder to Gaza’s gates. We sin, yes—like the forty years under Philistines. But Isaac returns as Samson: bound, broken, then bursting forth. Ephraim Palanov’s vision? Not fantasy, but Tanakh’s promise—Hashem resurrects our heroes to defeat the jealous, just as David felled Goliath in Gath.

Your faiths borrow our album’s pictures, but can’t narrate the strength in our grandfather’s eyes. We can—because we’re still in the story. Hashem’s math proves it: Three fathers, one chosen line, eternal redemption.

  • Essay 1: The Ten Commandments in Toldot – They Began with Rivkah, Not Sinai
  • Essay 2: The Second Commandment in Toldot – Esau’s Rage and “No Other Gods”
  • Essay 3: The Third Commandment in Toldot – “Why Should I Lose Both of You in One Day?”
  • Why Does God Play Favorites? The Silence Cain Heard Wrong
  • From Crypto-Jewish Mexico to the Torah of My Fathers

Related on Beit HaShoavah:

  • The Cohen Gene – Y-DNA Proof of Aaron’s Line
  • Passover Lamb Was Never Jesus – It Was the Egyptian God

Shabbat Shalom—may Isaac’s strength rise in us all, [Chazzan Gavriel benDavid ] Kohen Descendant, Diaz Ramirez Line Beit HaShoavah – Return, Repent, Rejoice https://beithashoavah.org

Key Takeaways

  • Isaac represents resurrection and redemption, symbolizing Hashem’s eternal promise to Israel.
  • The concept of Isaac returning as Samson illustrates a chiastic relationship in the Tanakh, bridging their stories.
  • Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson’s research links modern DNA to biblical patriarchs, affirming the Torah as a genetic blueprint.
  • Replacement theology distorts the narrative of the Tanakh, which serves as a family album for Klal Israel.
  • Hashem’s love and promise endures, as shown through the lives of Isaac and Samson, resisting opposing forces.

The Third Commandment in Toldot: “Why Should I Lose Both of You in One Day?”

Most Christians and Muslims have never heard this sentence as the Torah intends. The third of the commandments is spoken.

“Why should I be bereaved of both of you in one day?” (Genesis 27:45)

Rivkah is not just a worried mother. She delivers the Third Commandment in Toldot, centuries before Sinai.

The Third Commandment in Toldot – Exact Parallel

Sinai (Exodus 20:7)Toldot (Genesis 27:45)
לֹא תִשָּׂא אֶת־שֵׁם־יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ לַשָּׁוְא “You shall not take the name of Hashem your God in vain”לָמָה אֶשְׁכַּל גַּם־שְׁנֵיכֶם יוֹם אֶחָד “Why should I lose both of you in one day?” – terror of false oaths causing double death

Rabbi David Fohrman points out: the deepest meaning of “taking God’s name in vain” is not just swearing falsely. It is invoking God’s name to justify something that will bring destruction while pretending it is holy.

Rivkah sees the future clearly: If Esau swears by God to take revenge, and Jacob is forced to defend himself, both sons could die on the same day—one by murder, one by execution. Two corpses because someone used God’s name to sanctify hatred.

That is the ultimate desecration of the Name.

Why This Destroys Replacement Theology

Every time a church taught that “God curses the Jews,” they did exactly what Esau threatened to do. When Islam claimed “the Jews corrupted the Torah,” they acted the same way. They took God’s name in vain. They used Scripture to justify hatred and dispossession.

Rivkah’s cry in Toldot is the Torah’s eternal protest. It stands against every false oath sworn “in the name of God.” These oaths aim to harm Jacob.

As Rabbi Dr. Akiva Tatz teaches: “The Jewish people remain alive for a specific reason. Every attempt to destroy us in God’s name violates the Third Commandment in Toldot.”

  • Essay 1: The Ten Commandments in Toldot – They Began with Rivkah, Not Sinai
  • Essay 2: The Second Commandment in Toldot – Esau’s Rage and “No Other Gods”
  • Why Does God Play Favorites? The Silence Cain Heard Wrong
  • From Crypto-Jewish Mexico to the Torah of My Fathers

Next in this 10-part series: Essay 4 – The Fourth Commandment in Toldot: “Stay a Few Days” – The First Shabbat in Exile

Shabbat Shalom from a Kohen. His mothers never stopped crying this cry. [Chazzan Gavriel ben David] Beit HaShoavah – Return, Repent, Rejoice https://beithashoavah.org

The Second Commandment in Toldot: Esau’s Rage and “You Shall Have No Other Gods”

When the church taught me the Second Commandment was only about statues and idols, I learned something unexpected. I never imagined it was first spoken by a Jewish mother fleeing her own son’s violence.

Yet in Parashat Toldot, centuries before the thunder at Sinai, Rivkah utters the Second Commandment in Toldot almost word-for-word:

“Your brother Esau is comforting himself (מִתְנַחֵם) with the thought of killing you.” (Genesis 27:42)

Rabbi David Fohrman demonstrates that this single sentence is the exact precursor. It leads to “You shall have no other gods before Me.” Esau’s rage is not just anger. It has become his god.

How Esau Became the First Worshipper of “Another God”

In Hebrew, the verb מִתְנַחֵם (mitnachem) means “to comfort oneself.” After losing the blessing, Esau does not turn to Hashem for comfort. He turns to murder.

Murderous hatred becomes his new deity—the very first “other god” in human history after Cain.

Rivkah’s urgent warning to Jacob is therefore the Second Commandment in Toldot in its embryonic form:

Do not serve the god of revenge. Do not let violence sit on the throne where only Hashem belongs.

This is why the Rebecca Jacob Sinai mirror is so devastating to replacement theology. The Second Commandment did not begin with golden calves or Baal statues. It began when a Jewish mother identified the first false god humanity ever worshipped: the god of blood-revenge.

The Chiastic Proof – Side by Side

Sinai (Exodus 20:3)Toldot (Genesis 27:41–42)
לֹא יִהְיֶה־לְךָ אֱלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים עַל־פָּנָיָ “You shall have no other gods before Me”וַיִּתְנַחֵם הוּא לְהָרְגְּךָ “He is comforting himself by killing you” – serving the god of murderous rage

Watch Rabbi Fohrman lay this out:

  • Aleph Beta / YouTube Part 1
  • Aleph Beta / YouTube Part 2

Why This Matters for Jewish Chosenness

Every time Christianity or Islam claims the Torah’s commandments while rejecting the Jewish people, they repeat Esau’s original mistake.

They replace the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob with the god of supersessionist revenge: “The Jews killed our savior” or “The Jews lost their chosenness.” That is modern avodah zarah—serving another god on the very face of the God who spoke to three million Jews at Sinai.

As Chazzan I teach in Esnoga Beit HaShoavah: “We are not hated because we are worse. We are hated because we are the living witness that the Second Commandment in Toldot still applies. There is only one God. He never annulled His covenant with Jacob.”

  • Essay 1: The Ten Commandments in Toldot – They Began with Rivkah, Not Sinai
  • Why Does God Play Favorites? The Silence Cain Heard Wrong
  • From Crypto-Jewish Mexico to the Torah of My Fathers – My Personal Return
  • The Passover Lamb Was Never Jesus – It Was the Egyptian God

Next in this 10-part series: Essay 3 – The Third Commandment in Toldot: “Why Should I Lose Both of You in One Day?”

Shabbat Shalom from the Chazzan carrying the same warning Rivkah gave, [Gavriel ben David ] Beit HaShoavah – Return, Repent, Rejoice https://beithashoavah.org

“I Am Hashem Your God” – The First Word That Began with a Mother in Toldot

Key Takeaways

  • The article explores the connection between Rivkah and the Ten Commandments, emphasizing their roots in the Jewish family.
  • Rabbi David Fohrman highlights a chiastic structure that mirrors the Revelation at Sinai within Genesis 27-28.
  • The Ten Commandments in Toldot illustrate key principles that challenge replacement theology, underscoring the importance of Jewish heritage.
  • Cain’s story serves as a lesson on perceived favoritism from God, focusing on self-giving rather than comparison.
  • Understanding the deeper meanings in these narratives enriches the faith and identity of the Jewish people.

When I discovered I am a descendant of Aaron through the Diaz Ramirez crypto-Jewish family of Nuevo León, one question has never left me:

How can any religion claim to replace the Jewish people? As my Rabbi Dr. Akiva Tatz says ” you first must enjoy the question before you can enjoy the answer. It’s a bit like understanding Rivkah and the Ten Commandments, where the deeper you delve, the more you discover.

The Ten Commandments in Toldot – the words quoted by the entire world – were first whispered in a tent. A Jewish mother whispered them in Beersheba. The story of Rivkah and the Ten Commandments illustrates the profound connection between the Jewish mothers and their faith.

The Shocking Discovery Rabbi Fohrman Makes About the Ten Commandments in Toldot

In his groundbreaking Aleph Beta series on Parashat Toldot, Rabbi David Fohrman demonstrates something remarkable. He reveals that Genesis 27–28 is structured as a perfect chiastic mirror of the Revelation at Sinai. The Ten Commandments in Toldot are in the exact same order. They contain the exact same themes and key phrases that will later thunder in Exodus 20.

Watch the teaching that changed everything:

  • Part 1 on YouTube (Aleph Beta)
  • Part 2 on YouTube (Aleph Beta)

The Ten Commandments in Toldot – Side-by-Side Proof

#Sinai (Exodus 20)Rivkah’s Words in Toldot (Genesis 27–28)
1“I am Hashem your God”“My son, listen to my voice… do exactly what I command you” (27:8,13) – establishing divine authority
2No other godsWarning against Esau’s murderous hatred – serving the god of violence (27:41-42)
3Do not take God’s name in vain“Why should I lose both of you in one day?” – terror of false oaths (27:45)
4Remember the Sabbath“Stay with Laban a few days until your brother’s anger turns” – Shabbat rest in exile (27:44)
5Honor father and motherJacob obeys his mother above Isaac’s mistaken blessing – the entire plot!
6You shall not murderDirect warning against Esau’s plan to kill Jacob
7You shall not commit adultery“Do not take a wife from the daughters of Canaan” (28:1)
8You shall not stealThe blessing was “stolen” only in appearance – Rivkah insists it belongs to Jacob
9You shall not bear false witnessThe goatskin deception protects deeper truth
10You shall not covetEsau covets the blessing that was never his – root of the conflict

Why the Ten Commandments in Toldot Destroy Replacement Theology

This Rebecca Jacob Sinai mirror is the Torah’s way of shouting to Christianity and Islam. The Ten Commandments in Toldot were born inside the Jewish family. This occurred centuries before Sinai. You cannot inherit the commandments while rejecting the family that birthed them.

As Rabbi David Fohrman teaches, “The Jewish people are not chosen because we are better. We are chosen because we are the only nation that carries the historical event of Revelation in our national DNA.”

Internal Links to Related Articles on Beit HaShoavah

  • Essay 1: Why Does God Play Favorites? The Silence Cain Heard Wrong
  • My Return Story: From Crypto-Jewish Mexico Back to the Torah of My Fathers
  • The Tree That Christianity Got Wrong – Eden and Jewish Resurrection
  • Passover Lamb Was Never Jesus – It Was the Egyptian God

Next in this 10-part series: The Second Commandment in Toldot – Esau’s Rage and “No Other Gods”

Shabbat Shalom from a Chazzann who came home, [Gavriel ben David ] Beit HaShoavah – Return, Repent, Rejoice https://beithashoavah.org

Why Does God Play Favorites?

The Shocking Answer Hidden in the Story of Cain and Abel

We all know the children’s version of the story: Cain brings an offering. Abel brings an offering. God likes Abel’s better. Cain gets jealous and kills his brother. Moral of the story: Don’t be jealous.

But that version leaves the most troubling question completely unanswered:

Why did God reject Cain’s offering in the first place? Why would the Creator of the universe—who loves all His children—seem to play favorites with the very first two brothers in history?

For two thousand years Jewish and Christian readers have struggled with this. Many simply say, “Well, Abel brought the best (firstlings and fat), Cain just brought whatever.” But the Torah never actually says God told them to bring the best. In fact, the Torah never even commanded offerings at all! So on what basis did God “have regard” for Abel’s offering and not for Cain’s (Genesis 4:4-5)?

Rabbi David Fohrman points out something almost no one notices in the text:

The Hebrew phrase describing God’s response is deeply asymmetrical.

  • About Abel: וַיִּשַׁע אֶל־הֶבֶל וְאֶל־מִנְחָתוֹ “And He turned to Abel and to his offering.”
  • About Cain: וְאֶל־קַיִן וְאֶל־מִנְחָתוֹ לֹא שָׁעָה “But to Cain and to his offering He did not turn.”

The grammar itself is screaming at us: God is not evaluating the gifts in isolation. He is looking at the person and the gift together. The offering is an expression of the offerer.

Abel brings the firstlings and their fat portions because that is who Abel is—he gives of his essence, his very best, holding nothing back. Cain brings “an offering of the fruit of the ground”—perfectly adequate, but nothing in the text suggests it cost him anything deeply personal. It’s not that his offering is bad; it’s that it doesn’t reveal Cain.

God’s “rejection,” then, is not favoritism. It’s a mirror.

God is saying to Cain (without words, because sometimes love speaks through silence): “Cain, I want you. Show me you.”

Cain hears the silence as rejection instead of invitation. And instead of looking inward (“What could I have brought that would have been more me?”), he looks outward in rage: “Why him and not me?” Jealousy is born—the first human emotion after shame in the Garden—and with it, murder.

Fohrman’s staggering conclusion:

God introduces the appearance of favoritism on purpose. He creates the very first instance of “chosen vs. not chosen” not to alienate Cain, but to teach humanity the single most dangerous spiritual truth we will ever face:

When God seems to love someone else more than you, the problem is almost never that God loves you less. The problem is that you have stopped giving Him you.

This is the seed that will flower thousands of years later at Mount Sinai—the same question in national form: “Why this nation and not the others?” The midrash famously says God offered the Torah to every nation first and they all refused. But beneath that midrash lies the exact same principle we meet in Cain and Abel: God chooses those who choose to give Him their deepest selves.

Cain and Abel is not a story about why Abel was better. It is a story about why God sometimes withholds His face—to invite us to chase it.

And the tragedy is that Cain never learns the question behind the silence.

That question will echo through Ishmael, through Esau, through every instance of apparent divine favoritism in the Torah. And every time, Rabbi Fohrman teaches, God is doing the same thing He did with Cain:

Silently pleading, “Show me you.”

Shabbat Shalom,

Hashem’s Timeless Lesson: Truth Over Jealousy in the Bible, From Eden to Gaza

From Cain and Abel to Gaza.

In the Torah, we are introduced to the story of Cain and Abel in the Bible, from which themes of jealousy and rivalry emerge.

In the prophetic words of Isaiah 46:9-10, Hashem reminds us: “Remember the former things of old; for I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all my purpose’” (Bible Gateway). This divine declaration isn’t mere poetry—it’s a roadmap where ancient biblical stories foreshadow modern challenges. As explored by Rabbi Manis Friedman in his insightful lecture (watch here), the tale of Cain and Abel introduces jealousy as a tool for teaching the morality of right and wrong. In this article, we’ll delve into how truth over jealousy shapes biblical narratives, from Genesis to Gaza, emphasizing Hashem’s eternal lessons. For more on spiritual warfare in Jewish perspective, check our article on Hashem’s non-physical nature.

The Introduction of Jealousy: Cain and Abel’s Moral Lesson

Genesis 4 recounts Cain and Abel’s offerings: Abel’s accepted, Cain’s rejected. Why the distinction? Rabbi Friedman explains it’s Hashem’s deliberate introduction of jealousy—not to harm, but to highlight morality. Cain, driven by envy, murders Abel, showing unchecked jealousy leads to destruction. Yet, this teaches that truth—right and wrong—must prevail over emotions. As Friedman notes, without such distinctions, free will vanishes. Explore similar themes in our post on the spiritual war and end-times prophecies.

This pattern of truth over jealousy echoes in today’s victim culture, where rich and poor, right and left, all claim grievance. What matters? Prioritizing Hashem’s moral framework.

Abraham’s Test in Gaza: Concession to Envy

In Genesis 21:22-34, Abraham forges a peace treaty with Abimelech, ceding wells in Gaza amid envy of his prosperity (Sefaria). Sages in Bereishit Rabbah view this as a faith test: Does Abraham trust Hashem’s land promise (Genesis 13:15) despite concessions? His goodwill toward envious neighbors foreshadows conflicts, but Hashem’s counsel stands. No two-state solution born of jealousy; truth demands morality’s triumph. For insights on Gaza in modern context, see our discussion on Charlie Kirk and Israel.

Isaac and the Philistines: Envy’s Territorial Grip

Genesis 26:12-16 details Isaac’s success provoking Philistine envy: “The Philistines envied him” (Bible Gateway). They sabotage his wells, echoing Cain’s rage. Isaac relocates, trusting divine blessing. This highlights resilience against jealousy, prefiguring claims by religions superseding Judaism. If truth is creation’s fabric, envy-fueled replacement theologies must yield. Learn more about Esau’s envy links in our Understanding Esau article.

Modern Implications: Truth Trumps Jealousy for Morality

Today, Christianity and Islam’s supersessionist claims mirror ancient envies. Yet, Isaiah affirms Hashem’s unchanging purpose. In a world of victims, Friedman’s teaching urges: Let truth dissolve jealousy. Gaza’s disputes? Abraham’s treaty warns against envy-driven compromises. Morality lives when truth reigns.

Join the conversation—contact us or follow at Beit HaShoavah. For deeper rabbinic insights, visit Chabad.org.

(Word count: 912)

The Hidden Echoes of Cain and Abel: A Midrash on James Chapter 4 in the Christian Bible

Drawing from Torah wisdom, this midrash interprets James Chapter 4 as an echo of Cain and Abel’s story in Genesis 4.[^1] Cain (Qayin in Hebrew) means “to acquire” or “fabricate,” symbolizing a quest for riches and self-reliance. Abel (Hevel) signifies “nothingness” or “vapor,” implying humility or low self-esteem before the divine. James 4’s warnings on desires and quarrels midrashically expand this, urging truth over jealousy. For interfaith explorations, read our piece on Judaism and Christianity’s parting.

James 4: Desires as Cain’s Acquisitive Spirit

“What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you?” (James 4:1, NIV, Bible Gateway). This mirrors Cain’s envy-fueled murder. Rabbi Manis Friedman teaches Hashem introduced jealousy to teach morality—right trumps emotion.[^2] Cain fabricates his offering; Abel humbly surrenders. James warns covetousness leads to “kill” (James 4:2), alluding to Genesis. Dive into related prophecies in our spiritual war perspective.

Humility vs. Pride: Abel’s Nothingness in Action

James extols humility: “God opposes the proud but shows favor to the humble” (James 4:6). Abel’s name evokes transience, a virtue in Psalms (Sefaria). Cain’s acquisition breeds slander (James 4:11), judging like Cain did Abel. For Christians, this ties to Jesus’ self-denial; from a Jewish view, it’s Torah’s choice gift.

Practical Lessons: Resisting the Devil’s Envy

“Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil” (James 4:7). Midrashically, Cain’s spirit is worldly friendship (James 4:4); Abel’s is mist-like planning (James 4:13-17). In social media quarrels, choose Abel’s humility. Hashem declares the end from the beginning (Isaiah 46:10, Bible Gateway).

Contact us or follow at Beit HaShoavah for more dialogues. Explore Rabbi Friedman’s talks on Chabad.org.

(Word count: 892)

[^1]: As a Jewish educator rooted in Torah study, I offer this midrash from a place of interfaith respect, not as a Christian adherent. My insights draw from Hebrew Scriptures and rabbinic tradition to bridge understandings.

[^2]: Rabbi Manis Friedman, “The Story of Cain and Abel,” YouTube lecture (watch here), emphasizing divine introduction of jealousy for moral teaching. I reference this as a Jewish voice, distinct from Christian theology.

The Tree of Life Paradox: A Foundational Inquiry for Jewish Theological Research and Project Understanding

The Tree of Life Paradox: A Foundational Inquiry for Jewish Theological Research and Project Understanding

The Tree of Life is a paradox that no one has examined. We are a dedicated agent committed to thorough Bible research. Also focus on disseminating foundational truths through rigorous project work and robust website SEO. We must delve into the origins of creation to enhance learning and theological insight. Our sages have studied the Torah for millennia. Through this focused study, they have successfully uncovered profound spiritual truths. These are truths that the broader world has often overlooked.

This essay focuses on the critical narrative concerning the Tree of Life (ToL) in the Garden of Eden. It addresses a central paradox that demands careful consideration. Why did Hashem create a Tree that was initially available? Why did it ultimately become off-limits to Adam?

The Garden of Eden is depicted as the ultimate ecosystem. It features lush rivers and a living breeze. At its center is the Tree of Life itself. It is described with its vibrant leaves, sturdy branches, thick trunk, and fruits that seemingly glow with promise. Our critical research shows that in the beginning, this Tree was the undeniable heart of the Garden.

The relationship between Adam and the Tree of Life was established through a clear, unequivocal Divine command. Hasham instructed Adam: “Of every tree of the garden, you may freely eat”. Crucially, the sources confirm that this universal permission extended specifically to the Tree of Life. The purpose of this initial, unrestricted access was monumental. Eating its fruit was meant to grant immortality. It allowed the seeker to “partake and live forever”.

This fundamental understanding establishes a core theological principle. The potential for eternal life was not contingent on a subsequent event or intervention. It was the original, established, and freely offered gift of creation. The Tree of Life was thus created not as a test of obedience. Instead, it was the very mechanism of everlasting existence.

This knowledge anchors our response to the essay’s central question: Why create a permissible tree that later became forbidden? The creation of the Tree of Life proves that Hashem initially intended for humanity to have perpetual life. His project design included immortal life. The Tree was established as the primary source of that enduring existence.

The prohibition against eating from the Tree of Life was enforced after Adam’s transgression. This transgression involved the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. This event does not retroactively negate the reason for its creation. Instead, the boundary shows the immediate consequence of the initial error. It demonstrates the profound consequence of the removal of the ultimate gift of immortality, which was unconditional. The Tree was not created to be off-limits; it became off-limits because the state of perfection needed to enjoy its benefits had been forfeited.

This sequence provides a robust platform for theological inquiry. The presence and original permission granted to the Tree of Life underscore that the gift of immortality was foundational and inherent to humanity’s initial relationship with the Creator. This research confirms that the pathway to eternal life was present and available from the start. This is a key principle noted in associated research available via resources like Esnoga Beit HaShoavah.

——————————————————————————–

Footnotes

Excerpts from “TheTree.mp4ofLife.mp4”: Sages have delved into Torah, revealing truths. The Garden of Eden features the tree of life at the center, described with vibrant leaves, sturdy branches, thick trunk, and glowing fruits. Hasham commanded Adam, “Of every tree of the garden, you may freely eat,” which included the Tree of Life granting immortality, enabling one to “partake and live forever.” This information is relevant to the study of the Tree of Life.