Tag Archives: featured

“I Am Hashem Your God” – The First Word That Began with a Mother in Toldot

Key Takeaways

  • The article explores the connection between Rivkah and the Ten Commandments, emphasizing their roots in the Jewish family.
  • Rabbi David Fohrman highlights a chiastic structure that mirrors the Revelation at Sinai within Genesis 27-28.
  • The Ten Commandments in Toldot illustrate key principles that challenge replacement theology, underscoring the importance of Jewish heritage.
  • Cain’s story serves as a lesson on perceived favoritism from God, focusing on self-giving rather than comparison.
  • Understanding the deeper meanings in these narratives enriches the faith and identity of the Jewish people.

When I discovered I am a descendant of Aaron through the Diaz Ramirez crypto-Jewish family of Nuevo León, one question has never left me:

How can any religion claim to replace the Jewish people? As my Rabbi Dr. Akiva Tatz says ” you first must enjoy the question before you can enjoy the answer. It’s a bit like understanding Rivkah and the Ten Commandments, where the deeper you delve, the more you discover.

The Ten Commandments in Toldot – the words quoted by the entire world – were first whispered in a tent. A Jewish mother whispered them in Beersheba. The story of Rivkah and the Ten Commandments illustrates the profound connection between the Jewish mothers and their faith.

The Shocking Discovery Rabbi Fohrman Makes About the Ten Commandments in Toldot

In his groundbreaking Aleph Beta series on Parashat Toldot, Rabbi David Fohrman demonstrates something remarkable. He reveals that Genesis 27–28 is structured as a perfect chiastic mirror of the Revelation at Sinai. The Ten Commandments in Toldot are in the exact same order. They contain the exact same themes and key phrases that will later thunder in Exodus 20.

Watch the teaching that changed everything:

  • Part 1 on YouTube (Aleph Beta)
  • Part 2 on YouTube (Aleph Beta)

The Ten Commandments in Toldot – Side-by-Side Proof

#Sinai (Exodus 20)Rivkah’s Words in Toldot (Genesis 27–28)
1“I am Hashem your God”“My son, listen to my voice… do exactly what I command you” (27:8,13) – establishing divine authority
2No other godsWarning against Esau’s murderous hatred – serving the god of violence (27:41-42)
3Do not take God’s name in vain“Why should I lose both of you in one day?” – terror of false oaths (27:45)
4Remember the Sabbath“Stay with Laban a few days until your brother’s anger turns” – Shabbat rest in exile (27:44)
5Honor father and motherJacob obeys his mother above Isaac’s mistaken blessing – the entire plot!
6You shall not murderDirect warning against Esau’s plan to kill Jacob
7You shall not commit adultery“Do not take a wife from the daughters of Canaan” (28:1)
8You shall not stealThe blessing was “stolen” only in appearance – Rivkah insists it belongs to Jacob
9You shall not bear false witnessThe goatskin deception protects deeper truth
10You shall not covetEsau covets the blessing that was never his – root of the conflict

Why the Ten Commandments in Toldot Destroy Replacement Theology

This Rebecca Jacob Sinai mirror is the Torah’s way of shouting to Christianity and Islam. The Ten Commandments in Toldot were born inside the Jewish family. This occurred centuries before Sinai. You cannot inherit the commandments while rejecting the family that birthed them.

As Rabbi David Fohrman teaches, “The Jewish people are not chosen because we are better. We are chosen because we are the only nation that carries the historical event of Revelation in our national DNA.”

Internal Links to Related Articles on Beit HaShoavah

  • Essay 1: Why Does God Play Favorites? The Silence Cain Heard Wrong
  • My Return Story: From Crypto-Jewish Mexico Back to the Torah of My Fathers
  • The Tree That Christianity Got Wrong – Eden and Jewish Resurrection
  • Passover Lamb Was Never Jesus – It Was the Egyptian God

Next in this 10-part series: The Second Commandment in Toldot – Esau’s Rage and “No Other Gods”

Shabbat Shalom from a Chazzann who came home, [Gavriel ben David ] Beit HaShoavah – Return, Repent, Rejoice https://beithashoavah.org

Why Does God Play Favorites?

The Shocking Answer Hidden in the Story of Cain and Abel

We all know the children’s version of the story: Cain brings an offering. Abel brings an offering. God likes Abel’s better. Cain gets jealous and kills his brother. Moral of the story: Don’t be jealous.

But that version leaves the most troubling question completely unanswered:

Why did God reject Cain’s offering in the first place? Why would the Creator of the universe—who loves all His children—seem to play favorites with the very first two brothers in history?

For two thousand years Jewish and Christian readers have struggled with this. Many simply say, “Well, Abel brought the best (firstlings and fat), Cain just brought whatever.” But the Torah never actually says God told them to bring the best. In fact, the Torah never even commanded offerings at all! So on what basis did God “have regard” for Abel’s offering and not for Cain’s (Genesis 4:4-5)?

Rabbi David Fohrman points out something almost no one notices in the text:

The Hebrew phrase describing God’s response is deeply asymmetrical.

  • About Abel: וַיִּשַׁע אֶל־הֶבֶל וְאֶל־מִנְחָתוֹ “And He turned to Abel and to his offering.”
  • About Cain: וְאֶל־קַיִן וְאֶל־מִנְחָתוֹ לֹא שָׁעָה “But to Cain and to his offering He did not turn.”

The grammar itself is screaming at us: God is not evaluating the gifts in isolation. He is looking at the person and the gift together. The offering is an expression of the offerer.

Abel brings the firstlings and their fat portions because that is who Abel is—he gives of his essence, his very best, holding nothing back. Cain brings “an offering of the fruit of the ground”—perfectly adequate, but nothing in the text suggests it cost him anything deeply personal. It’s not that his offering is bad; it’s that it doesn’t reveal Cain.

God’s “rejection,” then, is not favoritism. It’s a mirror.

God is saying to Cain (without words, because sometimes love speaks through silence): “Cain, I want you. Show me you.”

Cain hears the silence as rejection instead of invitation. And instead of looking inward (“What could I have brought that would have been more me?”), he looks outward in rage: “Why him and not me?” Jealousy is born—the first human emotion after shame in the Garden—and with it, murder.

Fohrman’s staggering conclusion:

God introduces the appearance of favoritism on purpose. He creates the very first instance of “chosen vs. not chosen” not to alienate Cain, but to teach humanity the single most dangerous spiritual truth we will ever face:

When God seems to love someone else more than you, the problem is almost never that God loves you less. The problem is that you have stopped giving Him you.

This is the seed that will flower thousands of years later at Mount Sinai—the same question in national form: “Why this nation and not the others?” The midrash famously says God offered the Torah to every nation first and they all refused. But beneath that midrash lies the exact same principle we meet in Cain and Abel: God chooses those who choose to give Him their deepest selves.

Cain and Abel is not a story about why Abel was better. It is a story about why God sometimes withholds His face—to invite us to chase it.

And the tragedy is that Cain never learns the question behind the silence.

That question will echo through Ishmael, through Esau, through every instance of apparent divine favoritism in the Torah. And every time, Rabbi Fohrman teaches, God is doing the same thing He did with Cain:

Silently pleading, “Show me you.”

Shabbat Shalom,

Hashem’s Timeless Lesson: Truth Over Jealousy in the Bible, From Eden to Gaza

From Cain and Abel to Gaza.

In the Torah, we are introduced to the story of Cain and Abel in the Bible, from which themes of jealousy and rivalry emerge.

In the prophetic words of Isaiah 46:9-10, Hashem reminds us: “Remember the former things of old; for I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all my purpose’” (Bible Gateway). This divine declaration isn’t mere poetry—it’s a roadmap where ancient biblical stories foreshadow modern challenges. As explored by Rabbi Manis Friedman in his insightful lecture (watch here), the tale of Cain and Abel introduces jealousy as a tool for teaching the morality of right and wrong. In this article, we’ll delve into how truth over jealousy shapes biblical narratives, from Genesis to Gaza, emphasizing Hashem’s eternal lessons. For more on spiritual warfare in Jewish perspective, check our article on Hashem’s non-physical nature.

The Introduction of Jealousy: Cain and Abel’s Moral Lesson

Genesis 4 recounts Cain and Abel’s offerings: Abel’s accepted, Cain’s rejected. Why the distinction? Rabbi Friedman explains it’s Hashem’s deliberate introduction of jealousy—not to harm, but to highlight morality. Cain, driven by envy, murders Abel, showing unchecked jealousy leads to destruction. Yet, this teaches that truth—right and wrong—must prevail over emotions. As Friedman notes, without such distinctions, free will vanishes. Explore similar themes in our post on the spiritual war and end-times prophecies.

This pattern of truth over jealousy echoes in today’s victim culture, where rich and poor, right and left, all claim grievance. What matters? Prioritizing Hashem’s moral framework.

Abraham’s Test in Gaza: Concession to Envy

In Genesis 21:22-34, Abraham forges a peace treaty with Abimelech, ceding wells in Gaza amid envy of his prosperity (Sefaria). Sages in Bereishit Rabbah view this as a faith test: Does Abraham trust Hashem’s land promise (Genesis 13:15) despite concessions? His goodwill toward envious neighbors foreshadows conflicts, but Hashem’s counsel stands. No two-state solution born of jealousy; truth demands morality’s triumph. For insights on Gaza in modern context, see our discussion on Charlie Kirk and Israel.

Isaac and the Philistines: Envy’s Territorial Grip

Genesis 26:12-16 details Isaac’s success provoking Philistine envy: “The Philistines envied him” (Bible Gateway). They sabotage his wells, echoing Cain’s rage. Isaac relocates, trusting divine blessing. This highlights resilience against jealousy, prefiguring claims by religions superseding Judaism. If truth is creation’s fabric, envy-fueled replacement theologies must yield. Learn more about Esau’s envy links in our Understanding Esau article.

Modern Implications: Truth Trumps Jealousy for Morality

Today, Christianity and Islam’s supersessionist claims mirror ancient envies. Yet, Isaiah affirms Hashem’s unchanging purpose. In a world of victims, Friedman’s teaching urges: Let truth dissolve jealousy. Gaza’s disputes? Abraham’s treaty warns against envy-driven compromises. Morality lives when truth reigns.

Join the conversation—contact us or follow at Beit HaShoavah. For deeper rabbinic insights, visit Chabad.org.

(Word count: 912)

The Hidden Echoes of Cain and Abel: A Midrash on James Chapter 4 in the Christian Bible

Drawing from Torah wisdom, this midrash interprets James Chapter 4 as an echo of Cain and Abel’s story in Genesis 4.[^1] Cain (Qayin in Hebrew) means “to acquire” or “fabricate,” symbolizing a quest for riches and self-reliance. Abel (Hevel) signifies “nothingness” or “vapor,” implying humility or low self-esteem before the divine. James 4’s warnings on desires and quarrels midrashically expand this, urging truth over jealousy. For interfaith explorations, read our piece on Judaism and Christianity’s parting.

James 4: Desires as Cain’s Acquisitive Spirit

“What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you?” (James 4:1, NIV, Bible Gateway). This mirrors Cain’s envy-fueled murder. Rabbi Manis Friedman teaches Hashem introduced jealousy to teach morality—right trumps emotion.[^2] Cain fabricates his offering; Abel humbly surrenders. James warns covetousness leads to “kill” (James 4:2), alluding to Genesis. Dive into related prophecies in our spiritual war perspective.

Humility vs. Pride: Abel’s Nothingness in Action

James extols humility: “God opposes the proud but shows favor to the humble” (James 4:6). Abel’s name evokes transience, a virtue in Psalms (Sefaria). Cain’s acquisition breeds slander (James 4:11), judging like Cain did Abel. For Christians, this ties to Jesus’ self-denial; from a Jewish view, it’s Torah’s choice gift.

Practical Lessons: Resisting the Devil’s Envy

“Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil” (James 4:7). Midrashically, Cain’s spirit is worldly friendship (James 4:4); Abel’s is mist-like planning (James 4:13-17). In social media quarrels, choose Abel’s humility. Hashem declares the end from the beginning (Isaiah 46:10, Bible Gateway).

Contact us or follow at Beit HaShoavah for more dialogues. Explore Rabbi Friedman’s talks on Chabad.org.

(Word count: 892)

[^1]: As a Jewish educator rooted in Torah study, I offer this midrash from a place of interfaith respect, not as a Christian adherent. My insights draw from Hebrew Scriptures and rabbinic tradition to bridge understandings.

[^2]: Rabbi Manis Friedman, “The Story of Cain and Abel,” YouTube lecture (watch here), emphasizing divine introduction of jealousy for moral teaching. I reference this as a Jewish voice, distinct from Christian theology.

The Tree of Life Paradox: A Foundational Inquiry for Jewish Theological Research and Project Understanding

The Tree of Life Paradox: A Foundational Inquiry for Jewish Theological Research and Project Understanding

The Tree of Life is a paradox that no one has examined. We are a dedicated agent committed to thorough Bible research. Also focus on disseminating foundational truths through rigorous project work and robust website SEO. We must delve into the origins of creation to enhance learning and theological insight. Our sages have studied the Torah for millennia. Through this focused study, they have successfully uncovered profound spiritual truths. These are truths that the broader world has often overlooked.

This essay focuses on the critical narrative concerning the Tree of Life (ToL) in the Garden of Eden. It addresses a central paradox that demands careful consideration. Why did Hashem create a Tree that was initially available? Why did it ultimately become off-limits to Adam?

The Garden of Eden is depicted as the ultimate ecosystem. It features lush rivers and a living breeze. At its center is the Tree of Life itself. It is described with its vibrant leaves, sturdy branches, thick trunk, and fruits that seemingly glow with promise. Our critical research shows that in the beginning, this Tree was the undeniable heart of the Garden.

The relationship between Adam and the Tree of Life was established through a clear, unequivocal Divine command. Hasham instructed Adam: “Of every tree of the garden, you may freely eat”. Crucially, the sources confirm that this universal permission extended specifically to the Tree of Life. The purpose of this initial, unrestricted access was monumental. Eating its fruit was meant to grant immortality. It allowed the seeker to “partake and live forever”.

This fundamental understanding establishes a core theological principle. The potential for eternal life was not contingent on a subsequent event or intervention. It was the original, established, and freely offered gift of creation. The Tree of Life was thus created not as a test of obedience. Instead, it was the very mechanism of everlasting existence.

This knowledge anchors our response to the essay’s central question: Why create a permissible tree that later became forbidden? The creation of the Tree of Life proves that Hashem initially intended for humanity to have perpetual life. His project design included immortal life. The Tree was established as the primary source of that enduring existence.

The prohibition against eating from the Tree of Life was enforced after Adam’s transgression. This transgression involved the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. This event does not retroactively negate the reason for its creation. Instead, the boundary shows the immediate consequence of the initial error. It demonstrates the profound consequence of the removal of the ultimate gift of immortality, which was unconditional. The Tree was not created to be off-limits; it became off-limits because the state of perfection needed to enjoy its benefits had been forfeited.

This sequence provides a robust platform for theological inquiry. The presence and original permission granted to the Tree of Life underscore that the gift of immortality was foundational and inherent to humanity’s initial relationship with the Creator. This research confirms that the pathway to eternal life was present and available from the start. This is a key principle noted in associated research available via resources like Esnoga Beit HaShoavah.

——————————————————————————–

Footnotes

Excerpts from “TheTree.mp4ofLife.mp4”: Sages have delved into Torah, revealing truths. The Garden of Eden features the tree of life at the center, described with vibrant leaves, sturdy branches, thick trunk, and glowing fruits. Hasham commanded Adam, “Of every tree of the garden, you may freely eat,” which included the Tree of Life granting immortality, enabling one to “partake and live forever.” This information is relevant to the study of the Tree of Life.

Reincarnation


@haemeth42

3 months agowhen I first heard this topic from Rabbi Mizrachi i was so amazed. Todah Rabbi for explaining this topic

37

Reply

@4951wolcott

3 months agoMr. Palvanov illuminates yet another subject of curiosity with the breadth of sources and penetrating insights that characterize his talks.

32

Reply

@raf_abreu

3 months agoWe are blessed to have a teacher like Efraim! Thank you again for all your wonderful lectures and all the efforts in teaching us the Emet of the Torah! Baruch HaShem!

65

Reply

·

11 replies

@raychingcar7881

3 months agoThe love of HaShem for His children is unmatched.

27

Reply

1 reply

@gavrielgoldstein

3 months agoRabbi I love how you strive to bring us back to the way judaism was meant to be understood. If only all Rabbis shared the same wisdom as you. You remind me that Judaism is not a religion like we are taught to believe nowadays but rather life itself and the way in which we should live.

Being Bold

נוֹעָז Being Bold

In a place of so many questions today. Who knows what is true? Many people tell me, as a Jew, that the Bible is not valid. That no one has the truth.

That can not be a true statement. There are truths around us everywhere we look. You are going to die? And that is a truth that no one disputes.

3335 years ago, the nation of Israel stood at Mount Sinai and received the Torah from the creator of the heavens and the earth. Today, people claim this never happened and is only a myth.

I was in Israel with Tim Mahoney and want to thank Tim for the great work that he is doing and has done. I am not a Christian, and I do not believe in the Christian Bible, but I do know that the Torah is the word of Hashem.

Christians are the leading producers of media that prove what we know from knowing Hashem and from Hashem choosing us to be His nation, Israel.

I want to present a series of documentaries that ask questions about what you know to be accurate or what some academics tell you is true. Most people have not taken the time to read the Bible and know so little about what it says. I would say 90 percent or more do not know the words of the Living Elohim.

The Telling of a Story.

This is done for educational purposes. This is a Jewish Site, and we are against the Christian Bible and its claim to be backed by the Torah.

Jonathan Pollard and Rabbi David Bar-Hayim: Day 55

Machon Shilo

Stopping Jordanian Military Provocations on the Border:

To watch a discussion between Jonathan Pollard and Rabbi David Bar-Hayim on the issue of innocent civilians and collateral damage please go to the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW1FZ… Please subscribe to the Machon Shilo channel and on Rumble at: https://rumble.com/c/MachonShilo Visit us at www.MachonShilo.org Want to get involved in Machon Shilo activities in your local area and meet like-minded people?

Please fill out the following quick questionnaire: https://tinyurl.com/jfbue98v Want to receive updates regarding Machon Shilo activities? Join a Machon Shilo updates group on Whatsapp or Telegram at the following links: https://chat.whatsapp.com/DHZj2jzzRjV…https://t.me/joinchat/V0OnDqXb3PuctB

What is True Strength? | Parshat Toldot | Into the Verse Podcast

Aleph Beta

Every shabbat, I look forward to “Into The Verse,” the new revelation I will receive from the Torah and the scholars at Aleph Beta, and the excellent commentary it provides within itself.

Rabbi Forhman often suggests, what if there was a book that contained all the answers to the stories the Torah lays out before us? How much would you pay for it?

I can not tell you the connection between the intertextual method Aleph Beta uses to reveal the love of Hashem in our lives as human beings and Jews. Aleph Beta has caused my relationship with Hashem to grow beyond measure. I thank Hashem daily for the Torah scholars He shares with us. May Hashem bless Rabbi David Forhman and his Aleph Beta family to prosper in all their endeavors.

Jewish History

I once heard a teacher say, So, you call yourself Jewish?

Well, how do you call yourself Jewish if you do not know our history?

By the way, it is one of the 613 commandments.

To know our history will amaze you, and you will know that there is an Almighty.

The time of Chanukkah was right before the rise of Christianity and the rule of Edom/Rome/Christianity. I often ask people where was the third capital of Rome located. How can someone understand the influence of Rome today if you do not know the history of Rome and the Jewish people?

Devarim 32:7

Remember the days of old; reflect upon the years of [other] generations. Ask your father, and he will tell you; your elders, and they will inform you. זזְכֹר֙ יְמ֣וֹת עוֹלָ֔ם בִּ֖ינוּ שְׁנ֣וֹת דֹּֽר וָדֹ֑ר שְׁאַ֤ל אָבִ֨יךָ֙ וְיַגֵּ֔דְךָ זְקֵנֶ֖יךָ וְיֹֽאמְרוּ־לָֽךְ: