Beloved friends, talmidim, and fellow travelers on the derech —

Rabbi Fohrman’s core thesis is that the Torah presents two seemingly contradictory accounts of why Moses could not enter the Land—not as a textual flaw, but as complementary perspectives that reveal deeper truths about leadership, faith, intimacy with God, distance/separation, and the transition from the miraculous desert life to settled life in Israel.

This essay weaves in Miriam, Korach’s rebellion, the intermediate judges (from Jethro), the spies, and themes of kal vachomer, Eichah (lament/distance), and faith.

---

I want to speak from the heart about the most painful verse in the Torah for anyone who loves Moshe Rabbeinu. At the end of his life, standing on Har Nevo, looking out over the Land he had carried in his heart for forty years, Moshe hears the words that break the heart of every sensitive reader: “For your sake, Hashem was angry with me.”

Not “because of what I did.” Not even “because I hit the rock.” “Because of you.”

How do we understand this? How does the man who gave everything — who stood in the breach at the Golden Calf, who taught Torah to a stiff-necked people for forty years, who begged God to erase him rather than destroy them — end up excluded from the very Land he was bringing them to?

The answer is not simple. It is not one story. It is two stories that the Torah deliberately places in tension. Because of this, we will struggle with them until they reveal a single, searing truth.

The Numbers Perspective: The Rock and the Missed Lesson

In Bamidbar 20, after Miriam dies, the well stops. The people who had been carried for thirty-eight years by her merit suddenly face thirst again. God tells Moshe: Take the staff (Aharon’s staff, the sign against rebellion from the days of Korach), gather the people, and speak to the rock.

Moshe gathers them. He looks at them — still speaking the language of Korach, still calling themselves “rebels” — and cries out in anguish: “Listen, you rebels — can we really get water from this rock?”

There is a double entendre here that only someone who has lost a sister can fully feel. The word הַמֹּרִים can be revocalized as addressing Miriam herself: “Listen, Miriam — how can we possibly draw water without you?”

Broader Context: Three Water Crises & Miriam’s Central Role

The story is the third of three desert water crises:

• Crisis 1 (Exodus 15, right after the Red Sea): Bitter waters at Marah. Miriam sings her song immediately before.
• Crisis 2 (Exodus 17): God commands Moses to hit a rock with his staff → becomes Miriam’s well.
• Crisis 3 (Numbers 20): Miriam dies → the well stops. God commands us to speak to “the rock.”

Miriam’s name permutations (Hebrew anagram play, no vowels in Torah scroll):

• מרים → מרים (marim = bitter) — Marah waters.
• מרים → מרים (merim = lift up) — Moses lifts his hand to strike.
• מרים → מרים (morim = rebels) — “Listen, you rebels.”

Every possible reading appears exactly in these stories, and Miriam herself appears (singing or dying) right before each crisis. This is not a coincidence; it signals her deep, behind-the-scenes role.

Fohrman begins exploring Miriam’s early life (the Nile story and the Sea of Reeds song) for further insight. He notes the odd phrasing “Miriam the prophetess, sister of Aaron” and her separate women’s song after the main Song of the Sea — questions the Midrash addresses.

The Story Re-Read with Full Context

After Miriam dies at Kadesh (the “topic sentence” of the chapter), the Well of Miriam stops. For the first time in 40 years, there is no water. The people immediately fall into rebellion, language lifted straight from Korach:

• They congregate/gather against Moses and Aaron (וַיִּקָּהֲלוּ… עַל מֹשֶׁה וְעַל אַהֲרֹן) — the exact rare phrasing from Korach’s rebellion.
• They cry: “If only we had died with our brethren…” and complain about being brought into this terrible desert with no water or fruit.

In the Korach story, this exact sequence led God to tell Moses and Aaron to separate themselves so He could destroy the congregation. Here, the same setup occurs — the people gather against the leaders, Moses and Aaron retreat to the Tent of Meeting and fall on their faces, the glory of God appears — but God does something completely different.

God’s Counter-Plan

Instead of destruction, God gives a counter-offensive against the rebellion:

• Take the staff — specifically Aaron’s staff that had been placed before the Ark as a sign (אוֹת לִבְנֵי מֶרִי) for future rebels. It is “Lecture #59” — the visual reminder of Korach, so they never have to relive that trauma.
• You and Aaron gather the congregation (הַקְהֵל אֶת הָעֵדָה) — reverse the rebellion. Don’t let them gather against you; take the initiative and gather them for the miracle.
• Speak to the rock before their eyes — the same rock that had been struck 40 years earlier and had become Miriam’s Well. It will give its water.

This is the new paradigm for a post-Miriam world.

Moses’ Despair and the Double Entendre

Moses takes the staff as commanded and gathers the people, but then he speaks these haunting words:

שִׁמְעוּ נָא הַמֹּרִים הַמִּן הַסֶּלַע הַזֶּה נוֹצִיא לָכֶם מָיִם “Listen, you rebels — can we really draw water from this rock for you?”

Fohrman shows this is not skepticism about miracles (Moses has performed plenty). It is despair born of deep understanding:

• Miracles require either extraordinary faith (placing oneself vulnerably in God’s hands) or Miriam’s sustaining merit/well.
• The people are in full Korach-style rebellion — the opposite of faith — and Miriam is dead. The well has stopped.
• Moses sees no path forward.

There is a chilling double entendre in הַמֹּרִים (“rebels,” spelled unusually without the vav). Revocalized, it becomes מִרְיָם — Miriam. Moses is almost crying out to his dead sister:

“Listen, Miriam — how can we possibly get water from this rock without you?”

He then does the only thing he knows from the old paradigm: he lifts his hand and strikes the rock with his staff (the same staff from 40 years ago), trying desperately to restart Miriam’s Well the old way. Water comes — but God declares he failed to sanctify His name through faith.

The Deeper Meaning of Rashi’s Kal Vachomer

This is the key payoff. In a world where Miriam carried the people with her faith (the daily miraculous well), the rock had one final lesson to teach before they entered the Land:

If a rock — which does not speak, does not hear, needs nothing from God, receives neither reward nor punishment — still obeys when God speaks to it, then kal vachomer we, who do receive reward and punishment, should listen and obey.

The rock represents life without Miriam. The people must now learn to live with direct, daily faith and obedience rather than being carried by a tzaddik’s merit. Hitting the rock was clinging to the old way; speaking would have modeled the new way and taught the lesson publicly.

Fohrman supports this with a beautiful Midrash (Seder Olam): The three siblings provided three daily miraculous gifts for basic survival in the desert —

• Well (Miriam) — water to drink
• Cloud (Aaron) — guidance on where to camp
• Manna (Moses) — food to eat

Life in the desert was “miraculous on a mundane level.” These were not one-time spectacular events like the Red Sea; they were everyday sustenance. With Miriam gone, that sustaining system begins to end. The rock’s lesson is how to continue in a relationship with God when the “easy” daily miracles that a tzaddik carries are no longer there.

The Eichah Midrashim

Fohrman highlights two ancient Midrashim that treat Eichah as more than a coincidence:

1. Three prophets used the language of Eichah (Eichah Rabbah):
   • Moses (Deut. 1:12): “How can I bear your burden alone?” (about introducing judges).Isaiah: “How has she become a harlot?” (Israel’s spiritual betrayal).Jeremiah (Lamentations 1:1): “How does she sit in solitude?” (Jerusalem’s destruction).
   The Midrash compares this to three women seeing the same noble matron at different stages: in tranquility (Moses), in moral/spiritual “travail” (Isaiah), and in utter degradation/exile (Jeremiah). Jewish tradition even reads the relevant Deuteronomy verses with the mournful Eichah cantillation on the Shabbat before Tisha B’Av.
2. Connection to Adam (play on Ayekah / אַיֶּכָּה — “Where are you?”): Same four letters as Eichah. God asks Adam, “Where are you?” after the sin, and he laments his expulsion from the Garden. The Midrash parallels this with God bringing Israel into the Land (their “paradise”), commanding them, their failure, and His lament with Eichah when He casts them out. Both are laments over separation and distance from an intimate relationship with God.

These Midrashim frame Eichah as a word of lament over distance — not just sadness, but the pain of relational rupture. This sets up the entire speech in Deuteronomy.

The Theme of Deuteronomy 1

The speech’s introduction is deliberately odd: it lists many places but highlights one with a time marker — they are only 11 days’ journey from Chorev (Sinai), yet this is the 40th year.

The central question the speech poses: Why did it take 40 years to travel what should have been an 11-day journey?

The answer, from everything we know in the Torah, is the sin of the spies. The speech is Moses’ retrospective on how that failure (and its roots) shaped everything.

Multiple Textual Connections: Judges + Spies

Fohrman shows that Deuteronomy 1 does not treat the spies in isolation. It deliberately weaves in the story of the intermediate judges (from Jethro in Exodus 18) with striking parallels. He lists at least six clear connections (and hints there are more):

1. Whose idea was it?
   • Judges: Originally Jethro’s idea (Exodus). In Deuteronomy, Moses presents it as his own.
   • Spies: Originally God’s command (Numbers). In Deuteronomy, the people propose it.
2. “It was good in my eyes” / “a good thing” — identical language of approval for both proposals.
3. Tribal representatives — judges chosen from heads of tribes; spies are one from each tribe.
4. “Bring the difficult things to me” — Moses tells judges to bring hard cases to him. The spies’ story opens with the people coming to Moses with their difficult request (“Let us send spies”).
5. Big people / small people — Judges are instructed to treat the great and small equally. Spies’ story features giants (big) vs. people who feel like grasshoppers (small).
6. “Do not be afraid — God is with you” — Moses reassures judges that God stands behind justice. He gives the exact same reassurance to the people about conquering the Land (“God goes before you and will fight for you”).

These are not random overlaps. Fohrman argues this is a deliberate Torah technique: two stories linked by multiple textual “waves” of connection. Each story illuminates the other. Understanding the judges’ episode helps explain the spies (and vice versa), and both together explain why Moses could not enter the Land.

He gives a model from elsewhere in the Torah (Joseph & brothers paralleled with Deuteronomy 21’s laws of the “loved” vs. “hated” wife, recognition/yakir, “found to him,” and “first of his loins”) to show how Deuteronomy sometimes functions as commentary on earlier stories.

How This Fits the Larger Series

• Mei Merivah / hitting the rock. Moses fails to model the transition from a world sustained by Miriam’s merit/faith to one of direct obedience and faith. He is barred as a leader.
• The spies (and their roots in the judges episode) introduce distance when closeness to God feels too burdensome. Moses sees himself implicated (“God was angry with me because of you”). Eichah is the lament over that distance.

Faith as intimate trust vs. the introduction of intermediaries/distance, and the consequences for entering the Land.

The Eichah Midrashim, the lament-over-distance theme, and the “wave encoding” of parallel stories are excellent for shiurim, especially around Tisha B’Av, Parshat Devarim, or themes of leadership and faith transitions.

Moshe does the only thing he knows from the old paradigm. He lifts his hand and strikes the rock with his staff — the same staff that had worked forty years earlier when Miriam was still alive. Water comes. But God says: You did not believe in Me to sanctify My name.

Rashi, quoting the Midrash, tells us what was lost. Had Moshe spoken to the rock, the people would have witnessed a living kal vachomer. If a rock — which neither speaks nor hears, which needs nothing from God and receives neither reward nor punishment — still obeys when God speaks, then how much more should we listen and obey?

That lesson was never taught. Moshe tried to restart the old miracle rather than model the new relationship the people would need in the Land. In other words, this relationship was one of direct obedience without the daily burden of carrying a tzaddik. In that moment, he was barred from leading them in.

The Devarim Perspective: “Because of You”

But Moshe himself, forty years later, does not speak about the rock. He speaks about the spies. And he says something astonishing: “For your sake, Hashem was angry with me.”

When we look carefully at Devarim 1, we see that the story of the spies is not told in isolation. It is deliberately woven together with another story — the story of the intermediate judges that Moshe accepted from his father-in-law Yitro.

Here are just some of the textual threads the Torah places between them:

• In both cases, someone proposes a “solution” to a burden that feels too heavy.
• In both cases, the response is “It was good in my eyes.”
• In both cases, tribal representatives are chosen.
• In both cases, the language appears: “Bring the difficult things to me.”
• In both cases, we hear about “big” and “small” — giants versus grasshoppers; great people versus small people who must be treated equally.
• In both cases, Moshe reassures: “Do not be afraid — God goes before you.”

The Precedent In Our Generation

These are not coincidences. They are the Torah’s way of telling us that the spies were not an isolated failure. They grew out of a precedent set years earlier. Specifically, this happened when Moshe accepted the introduction of intermediaries between himself and the people — and between the people and God.

When closeness felt too burdensome, a technical solution was introduced. The people learned that when the direct relationship with God feels overwhelming, you can ask for something in between. The spies were given the same request, now on a national scale. “Send men ahead of us”—give us a buffer, give us reconnaissance, give us something that makes the terrifying intimacy of “God will fight for you” feel more manageable.

Moshe, looking back, sees that he himself had opened that door. And so, even though every fiber of his being fought against the spies, he was included in the decree. “For your sake, Hashem was angry with me.”

The Single Root: Distance and the Lament of Eichah

Both failures — the rock and the spies — are about the same thing: the introduction of distance when intimacy felt too costly.

The Midrashim on אֵיכָה (Eichah) make this explicit. The same letters that appear when God laments Adam’s expulsion from the Garden (“Ayekah — where are you?”) appear when Moshe laments the burden of the people. They also appear when Isaiah laments Israel’s spiritual harlotry and when Jeremiah laments Jerusalem sitting in solitude. Eichah is the sound of separation — the pain of a relationship that was meant to be direct and has become mediated, distant, or broken.

Moshe’s tragedy is that at two critical moments — once by accepting the judges and once by striking instead of speaking — he participated in that distancing. Even if only by not fully resisting it, he was part of it. And because he was God’s closest servant, the standard was absolute.

What This Means for Us

My friends, this is not a story that lets us off the hook. It is a story that demands receipts.

The people wanted water without having to place themselves in God’s hands. They wanted spies instead of raw trust. They wanted judges between themselves and Moshe, and between themselves and God. And at key moments, even Moshe went along with the technical solution instead of insisting on the direct one.

The Land was never going to be entered by people who still needed to be carried. It was going to be entered by people willing to speak to the rock — to obey even when the daily miracles of the wilderness were withdrawn.

That is the lesson Moshe was meant to teach and could not fully model. That is why, in the end, he could only see the Land from afar.

But here is the hope that burns in my own heart as I teach these parshiyot in prison, in our small Beit Midrash, and to my own family:

The Torah: Return to Me, and I will return to You.

The same Torah that records Moshe’s exclusion also records his final song, his final blessing, and the promise that a prophet like him will arise. The distance he helped introduce — and the distance he suffered — is not the last word. The Tree of Life still stands. The hidden sparks are still returning. And the One who lamented “Ayekah” and “Eichah” is the same One who says, even now: “Return to Me, and I will return to you.”

May we have the courage to speak to the rock in our own lives — to choose the direct relationship, the uncomfortable intimacy, the “receipts” of real faith — so that when our own Nevo comes, we will not only see the Land, but enter it.

For your sake, Hashem was angry with me. May we learn from his pain what it truly costs to keep the relationship direct.

With love and with hope for the full redemption, Hazan Gavriel ben David Esnoga Beit HaShoavah — Amarillo

• Return to the Rock: What Did Adam Really Look Like According to the Torah?
• Parashat Shemot
• An Autobiography of Hashem’s Will
• “Take Words: Reclaiming Loving Guidance Before It’s Too Late” Find A Friend
• Daily Torah Lesson: Insights from Beit HaShoavah

Parshat Devarim and Haftarat Chazon

Find a friend and take loving guidance before it is too late.

Rabbi Goldstein:

“The ultimate goal must come from a place where I’ve expressed the verse, ‘ You shall love the Lord your G-D, which means that the name of Heaven should be beloved to you.

In other words, what is the ultimate goal of kedish Hashem? That people should love Hashem is the ultimate goal, and so a person who truly loves Hashem will want other people to love Hashem”.

1. THESE ARE the words which Moses spoke unto all Israel beyond the Jordan; in the wilderness, in the Arabah, over against Suph, between Paran and Tophel, and Laban, and Hazeroth, and Di-zahab.

א׳. אֵלֶּה הַדְּבָרִים אֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר מֹשֶׁה אֶל־כָּל־יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּעֵבֶר הַיַּרְדֵּן בַּמִּדְבָּר בָּעֲרָבָה מוֹל סוּף בֵּין־פָּארָן וּבֵין־תֹּפֶל וְלָבָן וַחֲצֵרֹת וְדִי זָהָב׃

2. It is eleven days journey from Horeb unto Kadesh-barnea by the way of mount Seir.

ב׳. אַחַד עָשָׂר יוֹם מֵחֹרֵב דֶּרֶךְ הַר־שֵׂעִיר עַד קָדֵשׁ בַּרְנֵעַ׃

3. And it came to pass in the fortieth year, in the eleventh month, on the first day of the month, that Moses spoke unto the children of Israel, according unto all that the LORD had given him in commandment unto them;

ג׳. וַיְהִי בְּאַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה בְּעַשְׁתֵּי־עָשָׂר חֹדֶשׁ בְּאֶחָד לַחֹדֶשׁ דִּבֶּר מֹשֶׁה אֶל־בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל כְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה יְהוָה אֹתוֹ אֲלֵהֶם׃

List of Questions Introduced, Answered, and Not Answered

Questions Introduced & Answered in This Podcast/Lesson:

• What is Sefer Devarim really (vs. popular “review” assumption)? → Answered: Collection of speeches, centered on the main mitzvot speech for the Land.
• Why does the book open with confusing geographic/timing verses (1:1-5)? → Answered: Double introduction to main speech + first speech; references prior teachings and current renewal.
• What does “devarim” (these words) refer to? → Answered: Primarily the mitzvot/laws of the main speech (with rebuke elements).
• What is the overall structure? → Answered: Four speeches; main one in 5–26.
• Why study Devarim this way (start from the middle)? → Answered: Books like this are best understood after full reading; the main content unlocks the intro.
• How does this fit Chumash’s progression? → Answered: Completes the Sinai covenant by providing practical laws for nationhood in the Land.

Questions Introduced but Not Fully Answered (Teased for Later Lessons):

• Why do details in Devarim’s narratives sometimes differ from those in Shemot/Bamidbar (apparent contradictions)? → Teased: Due to the introductory speech’s rebuke/motivational purpose for the new generation (deeper in the next shiur on the first speech).
• Exact internal structure of the main speech (e.g., how laws relate to the Ten Commandments)? → Teased: Follows Dibrot framework; more in subsequent classes.
• Full meaning of the name ” Mishneh Torah “? → Partially answered (not a simple repeat), but deeper implications later.
• Specifics of the first speech’s content, and why is the 40-year delay emphasized? → Outlined but detailed analysis next.
• Broader theological implications (e.g., for daily Shema, teshuva, nation-building)? → Introduced as key but expanded later.

Detailed Outline of the Introduction Lesson

Broader Purpose: Prepares the nation for covenantal life; explains differences in details (rebuke angle for new generation).

Common Misunderstanding: Devarim is a farewell review of Chumash (quick test: compare content — laws, narratives don’t match a simple repeat).

Logical Approach: Read the book in context. “Cheat” by starting at ch. 5 to see the long speech of laws (continues to ch. 26).

Main Speech Identified: Chs. 5–26 — laws from Sinai (with Ten Commandments framework), for life in the Land. Moshe reviews/teaches them finally.

Introductory Speech: Chs. 1–4 — history to explain the delay and motivate.

Opening Verses Explained: As above — double intro; “devarim” refers to the mitzvot of the main speech, taught in multiple places/times.

Parashat Davarim: Rebukes

Parshat Devarim opens with Moshe’s words to a new generation poised to enter the Land. Rabbi Menachem Leibtag’s introduction reveals that these verses are not a confusing list of geographic terms but a deliberate double introduction. Verses 1:1–4 introduce the entire book and its main speech of mitzvot (chapters 5–26), while 1:5 introduces the first speech itself.

The “devarim” are the laws Moshe taught during the ideal eleven-day journey from Horev to Kadesh Barnea—now renewed after forty years of delay caused by the spies’ failure. This backward reading—from the main speech to the opening—unlocks the pesukim and shows Devarim as purposeful preparation, not mere review.

The Haftarah for Shabbat Chazon, Isaiah 1:1–27, echoes the same rebuke. God declares: “I raised children and exalted them, but they have rebelled against Me” (1:2).

The people have become like Sodom and Gomorrah; their rituals are empty while justice for the orphan and widow is ignored (1:10–17). Yet the prophet offers hope:

“Come, let us reason together” (1:18), and redemption comes through justice and teshuvah (1:27). The parallel is unmistakable—both Moshe and Isaiah speak words of loving correction before national catastrophe.

Hashem Our Boss: Rabbi Goldstein

Rabbi Warren Goldstein deepens this through Pirkei Avot. Criticism is not harsh judgment but an act of friendship. Pirkei Avot 1:6 commands, “Acquire for yourself a friend”—a chaver who learns with you, advises, and corrects your errors because we are biased about ourselves. Pirkei Avot 2:13 adds that the proper path includes becoming a good friend who guides.

True tochacha must begin with self-work: self-awareness, humility, and the willingness to receive correction even more than to give it. It flows from generosity of spirit and love for Hashem, so that “the name of Heaven should be beloved to you” (Pirkei Avot 4:5, via the Gemara on Kiddush Hashem). The ultimate goal is inspiration, not fear—helping others love Hashem and fulfill their potential.

Perkei Avot

Pirkei Avot 5:21 crowns this vision: the highest level is one who brings merit to the many, mazake et ha-rabbim, by inspiring mitzvot, connection, and love. Moshe is the model; the opposite—causing many to sin—brings the greatest harm. Thus, criticism is reframed as “bringing merit,” building greatness in children, spouses, and communities.

Here, the essay turns to our generation’s failure. As parents and as Adam without the Bible, we have outsourced our primary duty—“Hear, O Israel, teach your children”—to systems and cultures that do not have our children’s best interests at heart. The result is a documented crisis: record teen depression, anxiety, and despair. Without the Tree of Life blueprint, humanity drifts, its frequency lowered, its energy drained. We have failed to give the words that create worlds and build resilience.

Yet the prophets do not leave us in despair. Hosea 14:2, read with the Haftarah, commands: “Take for yourselves words and return to Hashem… instead of bulls, the offering of our lips.” The frequency of Torah words restores what criticism alone might drain. Hearing rebuke is hard, but when it comes from love—as from a true chaver or from Moshe—it calls us to repent and reclaim our role. We must become the mazake, the one who builds up, who sees the greatness in our children and inspires them to love Hashem and one another.

The sky is the limit when guidance flows from self-refinement and love for Hashem. Then we sanctify His Name, spread connection, and show how much we care. The opening lines of Devarim finally make sense: these are the words we must take, speak, and live—so that the next generation enters the Land not delayed by our failures, but empowered by our loving inheritance.

Pirkei Avot 1:6 — “Joshua ben Perachia said: Acquire for yourself a friend [K’neh l’cha chaver], acquire for yourself a teacher, and judge everyone favorably.”

• Footnote/Context: Fundamental for criticism. A true chaver (friend) learns Torah with you, advises, and corrects your errors. We are biased toward ourselves; friends provide objectivity. Criticism from friendship is a duty of love, not harm. (Rabbenu Yonah elaborates the three purposes.) This sets the relational model for all guidance.

Pirkei Avot 2:13 (in the context of Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai’s students) — Students discuss the proper path. One emphasizes chaver tov (good friend).

• Footnote/Context: Seek a correcting friend and become one. Applies to marriage (“beloved friends”), parenting, leadership. True friendship includes uncomfortable guidance for success in Torah life.

Pirkei Avot 4:5 (on Kiddush Hashem) — Emphasizes actions that make Heaven’s Name beloved through ethical conduct.

Pirkei Avot 5:21 — “Whoever brings merit to the many [mazake et ha-rabbim], sin is not attributed to him… Whoever causes the many to sin [machati et ha-rabbim] is not given the opportunity to repent.” (Contrast: Moshe as ultimate mazake.)

• Footnote/Context: Highest achievement — inspire many toward mitzvot, connection, love (Hashem, self, others). Builds up greatness. Opposite destroys. Moshe exemplifies this through guidance. Criticism/guidance is really “bringing merit” and inspiration.

Hazan Gavriel ben David

• Parashat Shemot
• What the Tanakh Says About Today’s Events: Lessons from Parshat Chukat-Balak, Rabbi Tovia Singer & Rabbi Matityahu Glazerson
• An Autobiography of Hashem’s Will
• The Torah’s Hidden Clock
• Scripture Only, Please

Hazan Gavriel ben David Esnoga Beit HaShoavah, Amarillo, Texas 17 Tammuz 5786

In a world drowning in substitutions and lies, Christianity and Islam are two sides of the same coin, and they rewrite the original Hebrew Torah, which stands as the unalterable blueprint.

Part Five of this series examines one of the most systematic and consequential acts of textual tampering in history: the deliberate alterations found in the Greek Septuagint and the way later Christian theology relied upon them.

This is not an innocent translation error. It is a criminal rewriting of the very words Hashem gave at Sinai.

The Septuagint: From Legend to Christian Tool

The Septuagint began as a Greek translation of the Torah for Hellenistic Jews in Alexandria, Egypt, around the 3rd century BCE. The legendary Letter of Aristeas claims that Ptolemy II commissioned 72 Jewish scholars to complete the Torah in 72 days with miraculous accuracy. In reality, this was a practical translation for Greek-speaking Jews. The Prophets and Writings were translated later by different hands, producing a collection of uneven quality.

Centuries later, Origen of Alexandria (c. 184–253 CE), a prolific Christian scholar, created the Hexapla — a massive six-column comparative Bible. It placed the Hebrew text alongside Greek translations, including his own critically edited Septuagint.

Origen worked long after Christianity had emerged and was shaping its theology. His recension became highly influential in the Church. The Greek text many Christian apologists quote today is not the pure pre-Christian Septuagint but a later, edited Christian version.

This history matters. The original Hebrew is the best evidence — the language Hashem chose. When discrepancies arise, we do not correct the Hebrew with the Greek. We recognize the substitution.

The Law of Best Evidence

In courts of law, the “best evidence rule” demands the original document when proving its contents. Copies, translations, or secondary accounts carry far less weight. Applied to Scripture, the Hebrew Tanakh is the original. The Septuagint and its recensions are translations produced and edited centuries later. Relying on the Greek when it contradicts the Hebrew violates this foundational principle of truth-seeking.

The Generations of Adam: Rewriting the Blueprint

One of the most revealing corruptions Tovia Singer highlights appears in Genesis 5 and 11 — the generations of Adam. In The Blueprint of Creation and the Tree of Life, I show that the Torah is far more than narrative. It is a precise mathematical and spiritual blueprint, encoded like DNA, with gematria, chiastic structures, and perfect numerical harmony revealing the Tree of Life pattern from Adam onward.

Here, the substitution is blatant:

Hebrew Masoretic Text (the Blueprint):

• Adam fathers Seth at 130 years
• Seth at 105
• Enosh at 90
• Kenan at 70
• Mahalalel at 65
• Jared at 162
• Enoch at 65
• Methuselah at 187
• Lamech at 182

Greek Septuagint (the altered version): Most early patriarchs receive an artificial +100 years added to their begetting age, shifting the entire chronology from Creation to the Flood by roughly 600 years. An extra name (Cainan) is inserted into Genesis 11, a name not found in the Hebrew text.

The total lifespans remain similar, but the critical timing — when each man passed the seed of the covenant — is changed. This is not a scribal error. It is a deliberate substitution that disrupts the precise numerical architecture of the Tree of Life blueprint.

If the Torah is the operating system of creation, altering these generations is like editing the source code. The original Hebrew preserves the integrity. The Greeks introduced the concept of corruption.

Specific Criminal Rewritings (Side-by-Side)

1. Psalm 22:16 – “They Pierced My Hands and My Feet” Hebrew: … כָּאֲרִי יָדַי וְרַגְלָי (ka’ari — “like a lion [are] my hands and my feet”). Christian rendering (following later Septuagint tradition): “They pierced my hands and my feet.”

“Ka’ari” (like a lion) is consistently translated as lion imagery throughout the Tanakh (Isaiah 38:13, Ezekiel 22:25, etc.). The “pierced” reading relies on a minority variant and 2nd-century interpretive choices to create a crucifixion prophecy. Context: a psalm of David’s suffering, not a distant future event.

2. Isaiah 7:14 – The Young Woman Hebrew: הִנֵּה הָעַלְמָה (ha’almah — “the young woman”) is pregnant… Christian/Matthew 1:23 (Septuagint): “Behold, a virgin shall conceive…”

Definite article removed, almah (young woman) changed to parthenos (virgin), and immediate historical context (sign to King Ahaz) stripped away.

3. Daniel 9 – Timeline Manipulation: The Hebrew text speaks of 70 weeks (490 years) leading to events culminating in the destruction of the Second Temple. Christian interpretations adjust start dates, impose 360-day “prophetic years,” and force the timeline onto the 1st century to fit a messianic claim.

Patterns of Alteration: Pronoun shifts, removal/insertion of definite articles, context-stripping, and heavy reliance on later Greek recensions when the Hebrew does not cooperate.

Two Sides of the Same Coin

These Christian-side textual substitutions mirror the gradual evolution and codification we see on the Islamic side (Umayyad inscriptions reinterpreting “Muhammad,” Abbasid standardization of earlier Syriac/Christian materials). Both traditions borrow from the Hebrew source but layer substitutions to create new identities and theologies.

Ephraim’s Return and the Call Home

For those of us awakening as hidden Ephraim — those who love Hashem and His Torah but were raised in derivative systems — this is liberation. My own journey began on 9/11/2001 when my mother revealed our Jewish heritage and secret practices. It was sealed on October 7, 2023.

The tzitz of the High Priest that Rabbi Chaim Richman brought to Amarillo (one of the first places it touched American soil) was a tangible sign: the priesthood is awakening. My grandfather’s confirmed Kohen DNA and our family’s crypto-Jewish roots are part of this return.

Esnoga Beit HaShoavah has supported the Temple Institute for years. On this 17th of Tammuz, as we remember breached walls, we also see the walls of illusion crumbling. America, at 250 years, stands at a covenantal crossroads — a nation that intuitively understands the Temple.

The call to Ephraim is clear: return not through altered texts or substituted blueprints, but to the original Hebrew Torah. Love Hashem. Keep His mitzvot. Support the rebuilding. The Tree of Life blueprint remains perfect in Hebrew. Come home.

Zechariah: The Book of The End of Days- Today

As we prepare our hearts for the Ninth of Av. Many are asking who Israel is. The answer is very clear, let the Bible speak for itself:

 Zech 8 13 And it shall come to pass, that as ye were a curse among the heathen, O house of Judah, and house of Israel; so will I save you, and ye shall be a blessing: fear not, but let your hands be strong.

Zech 8 And the word of the Lord of hosts came unto me, saying,

¹⁹ Thus saith the Lord of hosts; The fast of the fourth month, and the fast of the fifth, and the fast of the seventh, and the fast of the tenth, shall be to the house of Judah joy and gladness, and cheerful feasts; therefore love the truth and peace.

How many Christian or Messianic congregations keep the fast of Zechariah 8?

You tell me?

Hazan Gavriel ben David

• Confession of an Ex-Messianic
• Two Sides of the Same Coin – Part 3: The French Revisionist School and the Christian Roots of the Quran
• How Can Christianity and Judaism Be “Two Sides of the Same Coin” When One Looks Nothing Like the Original Blueprint?
• The Torah’s Hidden Clock
• Two Sides of the Same Coin Part 4: Ishmael, Edom, Rome, and the End-Time Blueprint

Introduction: The King, His Scribe, and the Blueprint That Does Not Lie

Hashem is the King of kings. When a sovereign issues a decree, He employs faithful record-keepers to preserve it in an official book. The Torah itself testifies to this: the Creator does not leave His word unrecorded or unfulfilled.

A Book In Heaven Exodus 32:31-33

And Moses returned to the Lord and said: “Please! This people has committed a grave sin. They have made themselves a god of gold.		לאוַיָּ֧שָׁב משֶׁ֛ה אֶל־יְהֹוָ֖ה וַיֹּאמַ֑ר אָ֣נָּ֗א חָטָ֞א הָעָ֤ם הַזֶּה֙ חֲטָאָ֣ה גְדֹלָ֔ה וַיַּֽעֲשׂ֥וּ לָהֶ֖ם אֱלֹהֵ֥י זָהָֽב:
32And now, if You forgive their sin But if not, erase me now from Your book, which You have written.”		לבוְעַתָּ֖ה אִם־תִּשָּׂ֣א חַטָּאתָ֑ם וְאִם־אַ֕יִן מְחֵ֣נִי נָ֔א מִסִּפְרְךָ֖ אֲשֶׁ֥ר כָּתָֽבְתָּ:
33And the Lord said to Moses: “Whoever has sinned against Me, him I will erase from My book!”		לגוַיֹּ֥אמֶר יְהֹוָ֖ה אֶל־משֶׁ֑ה מִ֚י אֲשֶׁ֣ר חָֽטָא־לִ֔י אֶמְחֶ֖נּוּ מִסִּפְרִֽי:

Isaiah 55:11

so shall be My word that emanates from My mouth; it shall not return to Me empty, unless it has done what I desire and has made prosperous the one to whom I sent it.

יאכֵּ֣ן יִֽהְיֶ֚ה דְבָרִי֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר יֵצֵ֣א מִפִּ֔י לֹֽא־יָשׁ֥וּב אֵלַ֖י רֵיקָ֑ם כִּ֚י אִם־עָשָׂה֙ אֶת־אֲשֶׁ֣ר חָפַ֔צְתִּי וְהִצְלִ֖יחַ אֲשֶׁ֥ר שְׁלַחְתִּֽיו:

Isaiah 43:10

“You are My witnesses,” says the Lord, “and My servant whom I chose,” in order that you know and believe Me, and understand that I am He; before Me no god was formed and after Me none shall be.

יאַתֶּ֚ם עֵדַי֙ נְאֻם־יְהֹוָ֔ה וְעַבְדִּ֖י אֲשֶׁ֣ר בָּחָ֑רְתִּי לְמַ֣עַן תֵּ֠דְעוּ וְתַֽאֲמִ֨ינוּ לִ֚י וְתָבִ֙ינוּ֙ כִּֽי־אֲנִ֣י ה֔וּא לְפָנַי֙ לֹֽא־נ֣וֹצַר אֵ֔ל

Isaiah 46:10 declares: “I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say, ‘My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please.’”

The Bible: Who Is It To and What Is It For

---

The Torah begins with purpose, not randomness. “Bereishit” is understood as for the sake of the Torah and Israel. Adam represents the archetype; Israel carries the mission. The Tree of Life in Eden and its echoes symbolize the Torah as the path to life and connection with the Creator. Chiastic and numeric patterns organize the text like a living code — informational, relational, and creational.

Hashem wants humanity to see this truth. The opening statement is visible because it was meant to be seen.

---

As Rabbi Manis Friedman powerfully teaches in his podcast series, the Writer of the Torah explicitly reveals to the world who it was for and who it was to. The opening of Genesis (“Bereishit”) is classically understood as “For the sake of Israel” or “With the Torah [divine wisdom], Hashem created the heavens and the earth.”

Israel stands as the purpose; Adam (humanity) is the archetype. The Torah is the blueprint of creation — a DNA-like informational code that encodes purpose, relationship, and reality itself. It does not lie.

Bereshit/ With The Torah

Rashi on the very first verse brings exactly that—בְּרֵאשִׁית can be read as בִּשְׁבִיל רֵאשִׁית, meaning “for the sake of the beginning,” or “for the sake of Torah” and “for the sake of Israel,” both called reshit in other verses.

The bet prefix sometimes carries this causal or purposeful sense, like “for the sake of,” “because of,” or “on account of.” Here are five solid Torah examples where a prefixed bet works that way:

• Genesis 18:26 – “If I find fifty righteous people in (be) the city, I will forgive the whole place for their sake.” The bet ties the forgiveness directly to them.
• Genesis 12:13 – “Say you are my sister, so that (ba’avur) it may go well with me because of you (biglalech).” Similar causal bet idea.
• Exodus 32:12 – Moses pleads with God to relent from His anger “because of (al) the evil against Your people,” but the surrounding language uses bet-like purpose for the sake of God’s name and reputation.
• Numbers 11:29 – Moses says he wishes all God’s people were prophets, using language of purpose and cause tied to the spirit.
• Deuteronomy 4:21 – God’s oath and anger “because of you” (biglalkhem), showing the bet in compounds for “for your sake / on your account.

Meyer/Kennedy Discoveries (Part 1 & Part 2) and Their Support for Biblical Accuracy

Part 1 Key Discoveries:

• Amarna Letters (14th century BCE): Canaanite kings plead with Pharaoh for help against “Habiru” invaders attacking cities like Jerusalem, Gezer, and Lachish. The king of Shechem is accused of handing over land without battle — matching Joshua 8 & 24’s peaceful covenant renewal.
• Demographic & Cultural Shifts: Sudden population changes and new hill-country settlements in Late Bronze Age Canaan, with distinctive features— the absence of pig bones, temples, and idols—mark early Israelite material culture.
• Soleb Temple Inscription: Earliest extra-biblical mention of “Yahweh” (~1400 BCE), referring to “nomads of Yahweh” in the correct region between Egypt and Canaan.

Part 2 Key Discoveries:

• Hidden/Rarely Documented Yahweh Inscription: A pillar (from New Kingdom Egypt) explicitly links nomads associated with Yahweh to the precise geographic corridor (Edom/Moab/Transjordan) and timeframe of the biblical wilderness wandering (~1400 BCE). This is direct evidence of a Yahweh-worshipping group exactly where the Torah places the Israelites.
• Amenhotep II Anomalies: Sudden cessation of major military campaigns (possible loss of army/chariots at the Sea), a massive slave raid to replenish the workforce, and abrupt abandonment of a major palace complex — circumstantial fits for a post-Exodus Egypt in crisis.
• Ipuwer Papyrus Parallels: Ancient Egyptian text describes the Nile as blood, darkness (Ra unseen), boils/suffering, destroyed crops/livestock, social collapse, and slaves taking valuables — striking parallels to the Ten Plagues.

How These Show the Bible’s Incredible Accuracy These finds provide external, contemporaneous corroboration for the Torah’s historical framework. They place a distinct Yahweh-associated people in the right time and place for the Exodus, wilderness wandering, and conquest — contradicting minimalist claims that Israelites were a late Iron Age invention with no Egyptian ties.

The material culture (no pigs/idols), peaceful Shechem transfer, sudden destruction/settlement patterns, and plague-like descriptions align precisely with Joshua and Exodus without requiring later fabrication. The Yahweh inscriptions are particularly devastating to skeptics because they name the God uniquely tied to Israel centuries earlier than many secular timelines allow. Together, they demonstrate that the Torah is not a legendary embellishment but is rooted in real events preserved with remarkable fidelity.

Why Secular Scholarship Timelines Often Dismiss Jewish History

Secular scholarship has long employed compressed or late-dated timelines that systematically sideline Jewish historical claims rooted in the Torah. Minimalist approaches frequently push the emergence of a recognizable Israelite people and their monotheistic worship of Yahweh into the Iron Age (roughly 1000 BCE or later), portraying the Exodus, wilderness wandering, and conquest as largely mythical or heavily exaggerated.

This dismissal ignores or downplays contemporaneous evidence such as the Amarna Letters’ Habiru invaders, the Soleb and hidden pillar inscriptions naming Yahweh-linked nomads in the exact 14th-century BCE corridor between Egypt and Canaan, Amenhotep II’s military and labor anomalies, and Ipuwer Papyrus parallels to the plagues. By favoring models that minimize supernatural elements and early Jewish distinctiveness, these timelines effectively erase the Torah’s eyewitness national revelation and the Jewish people’s role as God’s witnesses (Isaiah 43:10-12).

Yet as Meyer and Kennedy demonstrate, when archaeology is allowed to speak without presupposed skepticism, the record repeatedly catches up to the biblical narrative — affirming rather than undermining the accuracy of our ancient history and covenantal identity. The data increasingly vindicates the Torah’s timeline, reminding us that the Jewish people’s story is not a late invention but a divinely preserved witness across millennia.

Two Views Same Answer – Truth

In “How Do We Know the Torah Is from God? Rabbi Singer Answers”, Rabbi Tovia Singer highlights the unique national revelation at Sinai and the miraculous perseverance of the Jewish people.

In the Meyer/Kennedy series — including the original discussion and Part 2 exploration — fresh evidence from a rarely documented “Yahweh” inscription and Exodus-era anomalies emerges.

Science, archaeology, mathematics, physics, medicine, and genetics are catching up to what the ancient scribes recorded under divine inspiration. The evidence converges without a shadow of a doubt: the Torah is true.

---

The Unique Authorship and National Revelation (Rabbi Tovia Singer)

Who wrote the Bible? Rabbi Tovia Singer answers with clarity. Unlike other ancient texts built on solitary visions, the Torah rests on national revelation at Sinai — witnessed by the entire people (Deuteronomy 4:9-13, 32-36). An entire nation heard Hashem’s voice and saw the fire. Inventing such a collective event would collapse under its own weight; the text commands remembrance across generations (“Ask your father…” — Deuteronomy 32:7).

The Torah also predicts and fulfills the Jewish people’s unparalleled history: exile, suffering, and supernatural survival and restoration (Leviticus 26; Deuteronomy 28-30). They remain “a people that dwells alone” (Numbers 23:9) yet endure as God’s witnesses (Isaiah 43:10-12). This perseverance is the living signature of the Author who declares the end from the beginning.

Rabbi Manis Friedman deepens this in his teachings: the Torah is not merely a rulebook but God explaining Himself — inviting humanity into relationship. The opening statement reveals its purpose: the Torah was given to Israel (and, through them, to the world), with Adam/Israel as the focal point of creation’s blueprint.

Science Catches Up: Professor Haim Shore’s Mathematical Proofs

Professor Haim Shore demonstrates through rigorous statistical analysis that biblical Hebrew encodes modern scientific data with a precision impossible by chance. His work (detailed in books and the documentary Math Unveils the Truth) reveals Torah words correlating with physical realities discovered much later.

The Evidence That Defies Random Chance

• Sun, Moon & Earth: The Hebrew words shemesh (sun = 640), yareach (moon = 218), and eretz (earth = 291) produce a linear correlation of 0.999 with their actual diameters. Probability this happened by random: 0.2%. Changing even one letter destroys the alignment.
• All Nine Planets: Hebrew names match NASA data for diameter, mass, volume, and orbital angular momentum with correlations of 0.977–0.982. Probabilities under 0.5% each.
• Physical Constants Hidden in Words:
  • Or (light) = exact speed of light: 299,792,458 m/s
  • Kol (sound) = 343.26 m/s
  • Damama (stillness) = 0 m/s Correlation: 0.9938
• Colors & Frequencies: Hebrew color words (zahov = yellow, ya’akon = green, etc.) match actual light wavelengths with a correlation of 0.9981.
• Water Phases: Karach (ice), mayim (water), and kotzer (steam) exhibit specific heat capacities that correlate at 0.9995.
• Metals & Atomic Weights: Gold (zahav), silver (kesef), and others match atomic weights or their reciprocals, with correlations of 0.991–0.9997.

The interpretations use classic Kabbalistic techniques on the letters themselves:

• Notarikon — splitting the word or taking initial letters to form new phrases.
• Temurah / permutations & rearrangements — anagrams or re-readings of the letters (e.g., בראשית → ירא שבת).
• Gematria & numerical correspondences — values and equivalences (e.g., 70 = sod).
• Connections to sefirot, colors of divine light/radiance, Shekhinah as “daughter” (bat, drawn from ב-ת in the word), covenant (brit), and cosmic rectification (tikkun).
• Broader Zohar on Bereshit adds the primordial “spark” or point engraving supernal light, the tehiru (vacated space), and emanation from the infinite.

Hebrew: The DNA Of Creation

• Celestial bodies: Hebrew terms correlate numerically (via gematria and related measures) with planetary diameters and masses on logarithmic scales used in astronomy (correlations near 0.999).
• Pregnancy: Heraion has a value of 271 — matching the median human pregnancy length.
• Time and anatomy: Shanah (year) aligns with 355 days; words for “ear” and “balance” share a root — a connection scientifically confirmed only in the late 19th century.

These are not arbitrary wordplays; they reveal how the Hebrew letters are building blocks of creation (echoing Sefer Yetzirah), with every layer pointing back to divine unity, the blueprint of reality, and the path to redemption.

These are statistically validated alignments across datasets. The Torah functions as an informational blueprint — like DNA encoding life — embedding scientific truth in its language long before human discovery.

---

The Yovel Was Jericho: The Return Of The Land

Archaeology has long been portrayed as skeptical of the Bible, yet refined dating, new documentation, and contextual analysis increasingly align with the Torah. Conflicting older interpretations are giving way to evidence that supports the biblical timeline and details.

Jericho — The Walls That Fell Joshua 6 records the walls collapsing after seven days, followed by burning. Excavations reveal massive mudbrick walls that collapsed outward, or “fell beneath themselves,” onto the stone revetment — precisely matching the description. A thick burnt destruction layer exists.

Rabbi David Fohrman (Aleph Beta) masterfully reveals profound structural and thematic parallels between the Yovel (Jubilee year, Leviticus 25) and the miraculous conquest of Jericho (Joshua 6), showing how both events embody the Torah’s pattern of sevens, liberation, shofar blasts, and divine encirclement.

These are not coincidences but deliberate echoes of the same underlying blueprint — cycles of completion, release, and return to the Creator’s order.

The Numerical and Ritual Parallel (Sevens and the Shofar)

At Jericho, the Israelites march around the city once per day for six days. On the seventh day, they circle it seven times, led by seven Kohanim carrying seven shofars (ram’s horns) before the Ark. The climactic moment comes with the long shofar blast (teki’ah gedolah), followed by the people’s shout — and the walls collapse (Joshua 6:3-5, 15-16).

Fohrman highlights the overwhelming repetition of seven: seven days, seven circuits on the seventh day, seven Kohanim, seven shofars. This mirrors the Yovel cycle — seven times seven years (49 years) culminating in the 50th year of Jubilee, announced by a shofar blast on Yom Kippur (Leviticus 25:8-9). Both events end with the shofar as the instrument of release and breakthrough: freedom from bondage (slaves return to family land in Yovel; the “stronghold” of Jericho falls before Israel’s entry into the Promised Land).

Linguistic and Symbolic Connections (“Causing to Pass” and Yovel Shofars)

The Torah uses strikingly similar language for the shofar in both contexts. At Jericho: “When the shofar of the yovel sounds a long blast… the people shall ascend” (Joshua 6:5 — bimshech bekeren hayovel). The shofars themselves are explicitly called shofrot hayovelim — “Yovel shofars” (Joshua 6:4, 6, 8, 13).

This echoes the Yovel law: “You shall cause the shofar of the yovel to pass [or sound] throughout your land” (Leviticus 25:9 — veha’avarta shofar teruah). The verb ha’avir / meshoch (causing to pass or drawing out the blast) links the physical motion of the shofars circling Jericho with the proclamation that “passes” across the entire land in the Jubilee year. Fohrman notes this is the same terminology used at Sinai for the shofar that signals the revelation (Exodus 19:13, 19 — bimshech hayovel). Encirclement and the “Off-Limits” Holiness

Sinai and Jericho

Both Sinai and Jericho involve encirclement that creates a zone of divine restriction:

At Sinai, the mountain is encircled with boundaries (vehigbalta et hahar saviv — Exodus 19:12); touching it brings death.
At Jericho, the city is encircled (vesavav et ha’ir — Joshua 6); Joshua curses anyone who rebuilds it (Joshua 6:26), imposing a similar “off-limits” sanctity with deadly consequences.

This shared motif of surrounding and setting apart underscores holiness and judgment — the mountain as the site of revelation, the city as the first conquest in the Land.Deeper Meaning: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Fohrman concludes that Sinai (revelation and receiving the Torah) and Jericho (conquest and entry into the Land) function as two sides of the same coin — both Yovel-like events. The Jubilee laws reveal the connection: release from servitude, return to ancestral inheritance, and the shofar as the herald of freedom and restoration.

Fifty Years

Just as Yovel resets economic and social order every 50 years, these events reset Israel’s relationship with Hashem and the Land — from slavery in Egypt to freedom at Sinai, and from wandering to possession at Jericho.
The patterns of sevens (completion) and the shofar (breakthrough and proclamation) are not ornamental; they point to the Torah’s architectural blueprint. Cycles of seven culminate in divine intervention, bringing liberation and holiness. This reinforces the idea that the Torah encodes recurring divine rhythms — from Creation (seven days) to history — that echo the Yovel’s ultimate promise of redemption.

The Hidden “Yahweh” Inscription — Explosive New Evidence from Part 2

armstronginstitute.org

The Soleb Inscription: Earliest-Discovered Use of the Name ‘Yahweh’ | ArmstrongInstitute.org

In this Part 2 discussion, Dr. Stephen Meyer and archaeologist Dr. Titus Kennedy highlight a rarely photographed and documented Egyptian pillar inscription referencing nomads associated with “Yahweh” in the region between Egypt and Canaan (Edom/Moab/Transjordan) during the biblical wilderness wandering period (~1400 BCE).

This is the earliest extra-biblical mention of Yahweh, uniquely identifying the group with the Israelites — no other ancient people worshipped Yahweh. It places them exactly where and when the Torah describes: after leaving Egypt, before entering Canaan, as a nomadic people tied to their God.

This directly challenges minimalist theories that claim the Israelites emerged only centuries later in Canaan, with no Egyptian origins or early association with Yahweh. As Kennedy notes, this inscription “places the Israelites right where they should be according to the biblical account.”

The Pharaoh of Moses, Amenhotep II Anomalies

Amenhotep II Anomalies — Fitting the Exodus Pharaoh. The same discussion examines Pharaoh Amenhotep II (fitting the timeline after a long-reigning predecessor). His reign shows:

• Sudden cessation of major military campaigns for decades (possible loss of forces and chariots at the Reed Sea).
• A massive slave raid claiming over 100,000 prisoners — possibly to replenish a depleted workforce post-Exodus.
• Abrupt abandonment of a major palace complex at Tel el-Daba with no clear conventional explanation.

This “strange sequence of historical anomalies” aligns circumstantially with a post-Exodus Egypt in recovery.

Ipuwer Papyrus — Parallels to the Plagues The ancient Egyptian poem describes the Nile turning to blood, widespread destruction of crops and livestock, boils/suffering, darkness (day not dawning, Ra unseen), social upheaval, and slaves taking gold and silver — mirroring the Ten Plagues in Exodus with striking detail. While mainstream scholarship often dismisses both as non-historical genres, the correlations are too precise to ignore and add another layer of corroboration.

Archaeology: The Science That Proves The Bible

Archaeology is catching up. The hidden Yahweh inscription and these synchronisms powerfully affirm the Torah’s historical blueprint for Israelite origins, the Exodus, and the conquest.

creation.com

The walls of Jericho · Creation.com

Conclusion: Irrefutable Convergence — The Torah Is True

From Rabbi Tovia Singer on national revelation and Jewish survival, to Rabbi Manis Friedman on the Writer revealing purpose and relationship; from archaeology’s Jericho walls, Amarna synchronisms, the hidden Yahweh inscription (placing Israelites exactly where the Torah says during the wandering), Amenhotep II anomalies, and Ipuwer parallels; from Professor Haim Shore’s mathematical impossibilities and Rabbi Glazerson’s codes; from DNA’s priestly signature to the informational blueprint mirroring DNA and the Tree of Life — the evidence converges from every direction.

Archaeology once seemed in tension; refined finds and Part 2-level documentation are catching up and affirming the record. Science once appeared silent; it now speaks in precise Hebrew correlations. The hard sciences are confirming what the ancient scribes declared under inspiration.

The King issued the decree. The Scribes preserved it faithfully. The Torah tells the end from the beginning and fulfills it. Like Abraham — one against the world — the truth stands.

Hazan Gavriel ben David

Further Resources

• Rabbi Tovia Singer: https://youtu.be/GPG4B8vvKmE
• Meyer/Kennedy Part 1 & Part 2: https://youtu.be/fgeCyAVvd88 and https://youtu.be/9XEDu3IqD-Y
• Haim Shore’s research and math unveil the Truth
• Rabbi Glazerson Torah codes (YouTube)
• Rabbi Manis Friedman’s teachings/podcasts on Torah purpose

May this updated essay strengthen faith and reach seekers. Shalom.

To understand the whole, you first have to master the parts, one by one, on their own terms. Think of it like a machine: you can’t grasp how an engine works without knowing pistons, valves, and fuel injectors separately—how each moves, what each needs, where it fails. Only after you truly get every piece in isolation can you see how they lock together into something bigger.

It’s the same with ideas, systems, or even people. You study one element deeply, without letting the others bleed in and confuse it. Then the next. And the next. That’s the only way the full picture stops being fuzzy. Skip this step and you’re just guessing at connections that aren’t really there. Gotta earn the whole by earning each part first.

Here’s the full list of the 42 Stations from this week’s Torah portion:

1. Rameses (רעמסס) – The starting point of the Exodus, where evil began to melt away.
2. Sukkot (סוכות) – Temporary dwellings: our first taste of living in transition.
3. Eitam (אתם) – On the edge of the wilderness; a place of boldness and decision.
4. Pi Hahirot (פי החירות) – “Mouth of Freedom”; the place of true liberation.
5. Migdol (מגדל) – “Tower” or “Build up”; a time of strengthening.
6. Marah (מרה) – “Bitter”; the place of bitter waters and first tests.
7. Elim (אילם) – Place of twelve springs and seventy palms; abundance and rest.
8. Yam Suf (ים סוף) – By the Red Sea; site of the great miracle.
9. Midbar Sin (מדבר סין) – Wilderness of Sin; a place of emptiness and dependence.
10. Dofkah (דפקה) – “Beating” or “Striking”; a place of pressure and testing.
11. Alush (אלוש) – A place associated with gathering and preparation.
12. Rephidim (רפידים) – “Weak hands”- where Torah commitment weakened, and Amalek attacked.
13. Midbar Sinai (מדבר סיני) – The Wilderness of Sinai, where the Torah was given.
14. Kivrot Hata’avah (קברות התאוה) – “Graves of Lust”; where desire led to downfall.
15. Chatzerot (חצרות) – “Courtyards”: a place of community and order.
16. Ritmah (רתמה) – A place of binding or judgment.
17. Rimmon Peretz (רמון פרץ) – “Pomegranate Breach”; a place of breakthrough.
18. Livnah (לבנה) – “White” or “Purity.”
19. Rissah (רסה) – “Crushed” or “Broken.”
20. Kehelatah (קהלתה) – “Assembly”; a place of gathering together.
21. Mount Shefer (הר שפר) – “Beautiful Mountain.”
22. Charadah (חרדה) – “Trembling” or “Fear.”
23. Makhelot (מקהלות) – “Congregations”; place of community division or unity.
24. Tachath (תחת) – “Below” or “Low point.”
25. Terach (תרח) – A place of delay or wandering.
26. Mitkah (מתקה) – “Sweetness.”
27. Hashmonah (השמונה) – Associated with the number eight and strength.
28. Moserot (מסרות) – “Chains” or “Discipline.”
29. Bnei Yaakan (בני יעקן) – “Sons of Yaakan”; a place of heritage.
30. Chor Hagidgad (חור הגדגד) – “Cave of Gidgad,”; a place of revelation in darkness.
31. Yotvatah (יטבתה) – “A good place”; pleasantness.
32. Avronah (עברנה) – Place of crossing over.
33. Etzion Gever (עציון גבר) – “Giant’s Backbone”; a place of strength.
34. Kadesh (קדש) – “Holiness”; site of major events, including Miriam’s death.
35. Mount Hor (הר ההר) – Where Aaron died; a place of transition and loss.
36. Tzalmonah (צלמנה) – A place of shade or darkness.
37. Punon (פונן) – Associated with punishment or refining.
38. Ovot (אבות) – “Ghosts” or ancestral spirits.
39. Iyyei HaAvarim (עיי העברים) – “Ruins of Avarim”; wasteland on the border.
40. Divon Gad (דיבן גד) – Connected to fortune or betrayal.
41. Almon Divlatayim (עלמן דבלתים) – A place of many journeys or cakes.
42. Mount Nebo / Plains of Moab (ערבות מואב) – The final station before entering the Land, overlooking the Promised Land.

These 42 stations are Hashem’s loving record of every stop — the bitter ones, the sweet ones, and the quiet ones — exactly like a father recounting every stage of his child’s healing journey.

Matot-Masei The World We Create

In Parshat Masei, the Torah lists all 42 specific journeys the Jewish people took through the wilderness — forty-two deliberate stops. Many of them had no miracles, no drama — just a name and a location. Rabbi Goldstein points out: if Hashem records every single one of these stations in the Torah, it means He cares deeply about the small details of our lives.

This Shabbat, we read the double portion Matot-Masei. In his powerful lecture this week, Chief Rabbi Warren Goldstein teaches that life is not linear. We all want the quickest, straightest path from where we are to where we want to be, but the Torah shows us something much deeper.

Last night at Beit Midrash, this truth came alive in a very real way. David came in frustrated, telling us how annoying his week had been. A bad storm broke two windows at his job. He had to order replacements, go pick them up, arrange installation — one frustration after another. When I asked him how this week’s Torah portion connected to his experience and whether he had asked Hashem why those windows broke, he said, “God is not concerned with small details like that.”

But Matot-Masei teaches exactly the opposite. If Hashem writes down every encampment in the desert, even the ones where nothing dramatic happened, then He certainly cares about the broken windows in our own lives.

This same message appears very early in the Torah. After Kayin kills his brother, Hashem asks him, “Why is your countenance fallen?” Then He says: “If you do well, will you not be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin crouches at the door — yet you can rule over it.” Hashem was telling Kayin, “You have your whole life to improve.” The journey itself is the point.

Da’at – Becoming Aware of the Soul (Rabbi Akiva Tatz)

Rabbi Akiva Tatz, in his lecture Da’at – Inner Knowledge, begins with a powerful and honest admission. He says it is “almost by definition impossible to find the words for this subject.”

Da’at (דעת) means intrinsic wisdom or inner knowledge. It is not information you collect or facts you memorize with your intellect. You learn a deeper way of knowing — something you know from within, through a faculty of the soul. It becomes the part of you that knows you exist, that knows right from wrong without external proof, that knows “now” is now, and that knows Hashem is real.

He explains the fundamental problem: “The words needed to transmit the subject, by definition, are inadequate. That means the subject cannot be put into words — yet the only medium we have is words.”

This is why, Rabbi Tatz teaches, if a fundamental concept has no word for it in the Torah, it is ultimately a human-created idea. For example, there is no biblical Hebrew word for “believe” in the Western sense of blind faith, nor is there a word for “doubt.” The common terms used today — safek for doubt and vadai for certainty — are later rabbinic coinages, not found in the Torah itself. In the Torah’s worldview, these are not primary realities.

In contrast, da’at is the inner eye of the soul. Rabbi Tatz illustrates this with the classic bicycle example. You can explain the physics of balance, the mechanics of pedaling, and steering for hours, but no amount of talking will teach you how to ride. The father holds the seat at the beginning — that initial support is a gift. But at a certain point, he lets go. You wobble, you fall, you get back up — and suddenly you feel it. That moment when balance becomes part of you is da’at. It cannot be explained. It can only be experienced through doing.

Da’at (דעת) means intrinsic wisdom or inner knowledge — not information you gather with your intellect, but something you know from within, through a deeper faculty of the soul.

He explains the paradox clearly: The words needed to transmit this subject are, by definition, inadequate. That means the subject cannot be put into words — yet the only medium we have to share it is words themselves. So the very first problem is that da’at is not readily expressible verbally. You can only understand it by having your own inner understanding.

The Garden

In Rabbi David Fohrman’s A Book Like No Other series on Eden, he points out how uniquely Eve describes the tree in Genesis 3:6.

God had described the trees as “pleasant to the sight and good for food.” But Eve flips the order—she sees the tree as first “good for eating,” then “a delight to the eyes,” and “desirable for gaining wisdom.” She turns pure appreciation into utility and lust, starting with the practical benefit instead of beauty. That’s what leads her to eat it. It’s a subtle but powerful shift in perspective.

Nechmad Lemar’eh Tov Lema’achal

In Genesis 2, God describes the trees as “pleasant to the sight and good for food.” But when Eve looks at the Tree of Knowledge, she flips that order: she sees it first as good for eating, then a delight to the eyes, and desirable for wisdom. That shift from beauty-first to utility- and craving-first is exactly what Rabbi Fohrman highlights as the key change in perspective. It turns appreciation into lust.

God describes the trees in Genesis 2:9 as nechmad lemar’eh — pleasant to behold — and then tov lema’achal — good for food. Beauty first, then utility.

Eve flips it in Genesis 3:6. She sees the tree as tov lema’achal first — good for eating — then a delight to the eyes and desirable for wisdom. She starts with craving and utility, turning appreciation into lust. That shift in perspective is what Rabbi Fohrman zeroes in on.

“This week’s double portion, Matot-Masei, lists the 42 journeys the Jewish people took through the wilderness. Not 40 years of constant wandering, but 42 specific stops—each one a deliberate stage. The Torah wants us to see that every stop mattered.

This mirrors exactly what we’ve been exploring with Adam and Eve. Hashem doesn’t push. He brings us to the edge, like a father holding the bike seat just long enough, then letting go. The command ‘do not eat’ brought them right to the moment of choice. Eating wasn’t rebellion—it was stepping into the wilderness of ups and downs, failures and heartaches, so we could learn what it means to truly live.

Just as those 42 stops weren’t random, neither was their choice. The path of knowing good and bad, tasting both life and death, is how we grow into who we’re meant to become. No shortcuts. No staying safe like angels in the garden.

The Torah never calls what Adam and Eve did a sin. It calls it a journey. And every journey has its stations.”

This process of becoming aware of the soul is exactly what our personal 42 journeys are for. Every stop, every broken window, every frustration is an opportunity to move from intellectual knowledge to inner da’at — from being carried to riding on your own.

Rabbi Goldstein on Becoming Aware of Your Soul

In another powerful teaching, Rabbi Warren Goldstein explores “Becoming Aware of Your Soul.” He challenges us to rethink our very identity and what it truly means to be human. The soul is not an add-on to the body; the body is the vehicle, and the soul is the essence. Becoming aware of it means learning to see life through that inner faculty — the same faculty Eve reached for in the Garden, the same one Kayin was being called to develop.

This awareness doesn’t come in a straight line. It comes through the detours, the falls, the seemingly insignificant stops. That is why Hashem records every single one of the 42 journeys. Each one is a love letter reminding us that the soul grows precisely in those moments we might otherwise dismiss as annoying or meaningless.

During our discussion last night, David became upset when I quoted verses also found in the Christian Bible. I explained that I do not recommend the Christian Bible as a spiritual guide. However, I do sometimes use it to help Christians see that their book is not independent — it constantly draws on the Tanakh.

One example I gave was “turn the other cheek” in Matthew, which echoes themes in Lamentations where Hashem reminds the Jewish people that the true source of their suffering was not Babylon but their own failure to follow Torah and keep the Shemitah. Another was from the book of James, chapter 4 — a midrash on the fight between Cain and Abel.

James writes: “Come now, you who say, ‘Today or tomorrow we will go to such and such a city, carry on business and make a profit.’ Yet you do not know what tomorrow will bring. What is your life? For you are a vapor that appears for a little time and then vanishes away.”

Notice the Hebrew wordplay. Kayin comes from the root kinyan — to obtain, to acquire, to grab. Hevel means vapor, something here one moment and gone the next. James is describing the same brotherly conflict we see in Genesis — the arrogance of thinking we control tomorrow while chasing material gain.

This is why I wake up motivated every day. Since 2012, I’ve listened to Rabbi Tovia Singer daily. His teachings opened my eyes to a painful truth: 99% of Christians have never been shown what their Bible actually says in its original Jewish context. A foreign story has been laid over the text that simply isn’t there.

We are all one family. Adam and Eve are the father and mother of all humanity. After the flood, only Noah and his three sons — Shem, Ham, and Japheth — survived. Modern DNA confirms all males today trace back to three primary paternal lines. That means you and I are either brothers or cousins.

So why do brothers fight? Why do brothers murder? Why do we not show kindness to one another?

The whole world is connected. The Ten Commandments are the only way to fix this broken world — by realizing we are truly one family.

Every stop in your personal 42 journeys matters. Even the broken windows. Hashem is paying attention to all of them, and each one is an invitation to become more aware of your soul.

• Series: Part II That Which You Have Not Heard.
• The Eternal Struggle of Self: Reincarnation, the Expanding “I,” and the Soul’s Never-Ending Journey
• Creating a Vessel of Worship: The Midbar of Silence, the Question of Justice, and the Song of the New Generation
• Parashat Chukat 5786: The 38 Years of Silence and Singing Your Own Song
• Becoming Aware of Your Soul: The Tree of Life Blueprint Christianity Never Answered

A deep dive into the plain meaning of Scripture, inspired by Rabbi Tovia Singer’s powerful conversation with ex-pastor Justin (Deconstruction Zone)

“Context is king.” — Rabbi Tovia Singer, in the February 2025 interview on Isaiah 53

What if pastors opened their Bibles and simply let the text speak — without later theological overlays? What if they read the Tanach the way they claim to believe it: as the inspired, consistent Word of God?

Rabbi Tovia Singer recently sat down with Justin, an ex-pastor on a journey of deconstruction, for a remarkable conversation centered on Isaiah 53. Throughout the discussion, Singer repeatedly demonstrated a single, stunning reality: the Tanach never loses sight of its subject. That subject is Israel — the nation descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Israel is repeatedly called Hashem’s servant, witnesses, firstborn son, bride, and the people before whom He bares His holy arm for all the nations to see.

No other entity — no individual messiah figure detached from the nation, no later “church” or “body of Christ” — is ever given these titles in the Hebrew Scriptures. The Tanach is laser-focused. When read in context, the message is unmistakable.

This blog expands on the key passages highlighted in that conversation, broadens them with history, archaeology, and classical Torah commentaries (Rashi, Abarbanel, and insights aligned with Baal HaTurim’s textual precision), and invites every sincere Bible reader to do what the podcast title suggests: read the Bible as you believe it.

The Podcast’s Core Revelation: Four Servant Songs, One Consistent Subject

The interview focused on Isaiah 40–55 (often called Deutero-Isaiah or Second Isaiah). These chapters form a cohesive literary unit of comfort and redemption after the Babylonian exile. Within them are four “Servant Songs.” The fourth song (Isaiah 52:13–53:12) is famous in Christian circles. But as Singer emphasized, you cannot rip it from its context.

Here are the explicit identifications of the servant spoken about or directly referenced in the podcast and surrounding discussion:

Explicit Servant Passages in Isaiah 40–55

• Isaiah 41:8-9 “But you, Israel, My servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, descendant of Abraham My friend, you whom I have taken from the ends of the earth… and said to you, ‘You are My servant, I have chosen you and not rejected you.’”
• Isaiah 43:10 “You are My witnesses,” declares the Lord, “and My servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe Me and understand that I am He.”
• Isaiah 44:1-2, 21 “But now listen, Jacob, My servant, Israel, whom I have chosen… Do not fear, Jacob, my servant… I have formed you; you are My servant, Israel; you will not be forgotten by Me.”
• Isaiah 45:4 “For the sake of My servant Jacob, and Israel My chosen one, I have called you by your name; I have given you a title of honor, though you have not known Me.” (Addressed to Cyrus, but for Israel’s sake.)
• Isaiah 48:20 “Go forth from Babylon… The Lord has redeemed His servant Jacob.”
• Isaiah 49:3 “He said to Me, ‘You are My servant, Israel, in whom I will be glorified.’”

These are not ambiguous. The prophet repeatedly names Israel/Jacob as the servant. The podcast highlighted how Christian readings of Isaiah 53 often skip these explicit markers and the entire preceding context of comfort to Jerusalem (Isaiah 40:1-2) and redemption from exile.

Rabbi Singer noted that, on his count, there are multiple direct instances in which the servant is identified as Israel in these chapters. The fourth song continues the same story: the servant who was despised and afflicted will be exalted, and the nations will be astonished.

The Holy Arm Bared Before All Nations — Isaiah 52:9-10

The podcast opened a key window with Isaiah 52:9-10:

“Break forth, shout together for joy, you ruins of Jerusalem, for the Lord has comforted His people, He has redeemed Jerusalem. The Lord has bared His holy arm in the sight of all the nations, and all the ends of the earth will see the salvation of our God.”

This is the immediate prelude to the famous “servant” description in 52:13–53:12. The holy arm is not a new concept. It echoes the Exodus:

“Therefore, say to the children of Israel: I am the Lord, and I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians… with a mighty hand and with an outstretched arm…” (Exodus 6:6)

Throughout the Tanach, when Hashem reveals His arm or mighty hand, it is to redeem Israel in the sight of the nations. The podcast connected this directly: the salvation the nations witness is Israel’s redemption and restoration. The “arm of the Lord” (Isaiah 53:1) is revealed in the vindication of the servant people.

Classical commentary connection: Rashi and others tie the “arm of the Lord” language to the visible, public redemption of Israel that causes the nations to reconsider their previous assumptions about Israel’s suffering.

Isaiah 53 in Context: The Nations’ Astonishment at Israel’s Vindication

When the full context is restored, Isaiah 53 becomes the nations’ stunned realization:

“Who would have believed our report? And to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?” (Isaiah 53:1)

The “we” in verses 4-6 (“Surely our diseases he did bear… the chastisement of our peace was upon him…”) is the nations speaking. They confess that what they thought was Israel being punished by God for its own sins was actually part of a larger divine plan. Through Israel’s suffering and survival, the world comes to know the true God and, ultimately, peace and healing.

Rashi’s Commentary

Rashi’s commentary on Isaiah 53 (widely influential) reads the chapter as referring to Israel:

• Verse 3: The servant “was despised and forsaken of men” — Israel in exile.
• Verse 4: “Surely our diseases he did bear” — The nations admit that Israel’s afflictions brought atonement or peace to the world (or that they had misjudged the cause of Israel’s suffering).
• The servant “shall see offspring; he shall prolong his days” (v. 10) — The nation survives and thrives after seeming destruction.

Rashi’s approach was not isolated. While some earlier midrashim and Targum Jonathan lean toward a messianic or individual reading in certain verses, the plain contextual reading championed by Rashi, Ibn Ezra (in many passages), and later rationalists consistently identifies the subject as the people of Israel. Abarbanel, writing after the expulsion from Spain, frames these chapters within the grand arc of Israel’s national redemption and ingathering — even while engaging messianic hopes.

Baal HaTurim (Rabbi Yaakov ben Asher), known for his precise textual and gematria insights, would appreciate how the literary structure of Isaiah 40–55 creates unbreakable links between the named servant (Israel) and the suffering/exalted figure of chapter 53. The repetition of key roots and phrases binds the unit together — a chiastic or intertextual “hyperlink” style beloved in Torah study.

The servant survives (“prolong his days”), sees “offspring,” and is “exalted” (52:13). This does not describe a crucified individual who dies young without physical descendants in the plain sense. It describes a people who endure exile, appear destroyed, and are miraculously restored — exactly Israel’s story.

Broader Tanach: Israel Is Consistently the Subject

The podcast’s insight scales across the entire Tanach. Israel is:

• Firstborn Son: “Thus says the Lord: Israel is My son, My firstborn” (Exodus 4:22). Hosea 11:1 applies the same language to the nation’s exodus from Egypt.
• Bride / Wife: The prophets repeatedly portray the covenant as a marriage. Hosea is commanded to marry a wayward wife as a living parable of Hashem and Israel. Ezekiel 16 tells the story of Jerusalem as an abandoned infant whom God marries and adorns. Song of Songs is traditionally read as the love song between God and Israel (or the community of Israel).
• Witnesses: Isaiah 43:10 and 44:8 explicitly call Israel “My witnesses.” They are the living testimony to the one true God in history.
• Light to the Nations: “I will make you a light of the nations, to bring My salvation to the ends of the earth” (Isaiah 49:6; also 42:6, 60:1-3). Zechariah 8:23 envisions ten men from the nations grabbing the cloak of a Jew, saying, “Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you.”

Nowhere does the Tanach transfer these titles to another people, another religion, or an individual detached from the covenant nation as a replacement. The subject remains Israel — sometimes the whole nation, sometimes the faithful remnant — through whom the nations are ultimately blessed (Genesis 12:3; 22:18; 26:4; 28:14).

History and Archaeology Confirm the Narrative

The suffering-servant story is not abstract theology. It is Israel’s biography:

• Babylonian Exile and Return: Isaiah 45 names Cyrus as the one who would allow the return — a prophecy so precise that some critics claim it must be post-event. The Cyrus Cylinder (discovered in 1879) confirms the historical policy: Cyrus allowed exiled peoples to return to their homelands and rebuild temples. Judah’s return under Ezra and Nehemiah matches the prophetic hope.
• The Great Isaiah Scroll (Dead Sea Scrolls): Dated to approximately 125–100 BCE, this nearly complete manuscript of Isaiah is virtually identical to the Masoretic Text used today. There has been no Christian-era tampering with the text. The servant songs stand exactly as they have for over 2,000 years.
• Merneptah Stele (~1200 BCE): The earliest extra-biblical mention of “Israel” as a people in Canaan.
• Assyrian and Babylonian records corroborate the exiles of the northern and southern kingdoms.
• Modern era: The rebirth of the State of Israel in 1948, the ingathering of exiles from over 100 countries, the survival against overwhelming odds in multiple wars, and the astonishing technological and agricultural contributions to the world — all while facing global opposition — mirror the “who would have believed our report?” astonishment of Isaiah 53.

Archaeology and history do not “prove” theology, but they demonstrate that the Tanach’s subject — a specific people with a specific covenant and a specific land — has a continuous, verifiable story unlike any other.

What Changes When We Read with Israel as the Subject?

Everything.

• Atonement and Forgiveness: The Tanach teaches forgiveness through repentance, justice, and returning to God (Isaiah 1:27 — “Zion shall be redeemed with justice and righteousness”; Isaiah 55:6-9 — “Let the wicked forsake his way… for He will abundantly pardon”). The podcast contrasted this with later claims that “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness” (Hebrews 9:22), a principle absent from the Tanach’s plain teaching on repentance.
• Monotheism: Isaiah 45:5-7 declares that Hashem creates light and darkness, peace and evil (calamity) — radical ethical monotheism. No dualism or trinity.
• Afterlife and Resurrection: Rare but present (Isaiah 26:19; Daniel 12:2). Not used as threats of eternal torment in the same way later developed.
• Prophecy and Current Events: The ingathering, the survival of Israel, the nations’ mixed reactions — these are not footnotes. They are the continuation of the servant’s story.

Practical Invitation

Rabbi Tovia Singer’s conversation with the ex-pastor models intellectual honesty and textual fidelity. It does not attack faith — it calls people back to the text they claim to revere.

If you are a pastor, a Christian reader, or anyone who loves the Bible:

1. Read Isaiah 40–55 in one sitting.
2. Note every time “My servant,” “Jacob,” “Israel,” “Zion,” or “Jerusalem” appears.
3. Ask: Does the text ever change its subject?
4. Compare with classical Jewish commentaries on Sefaria (Rashi on Isaiah is eye-opening).
5. Watch the full interview: Search “Ex-Pastor Powerful interview with Rabbi Tovia Singer on Isaiah 53” on YouTube (Tovia Singer channel).

The Tanach is not a wax nose to be shaped into later theologies. It is a coherent revelation with a consistent protagonist: the people of Israel, through whom the knowledge of the one God and ultimate redemption flow to all humanity.

When pastors and believers read it this way — as they say they believe it — the beauty, the faithfulness, and the living reality of God’s covenant with Israel become unmistakable.

May we all merit to see the full vindication of the servant, when “the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea” (Isaiah 11:9).

• The Suffering Servant: Israel as the True Embodiment of Isaiah 53
• Milestone 19: The Lord Descending in Power upon Sinai on the Third Day
• The Torah: A Book Like No Other – October 7 Prophecy & The Tree of Life Blueprint
• The Fourth Commandment in Toldot: “Stay With Laban a Few Days” – The First Shabbat in Exile
• The Jewish Prophets Words

A War Is Coming – Purim Is Coming

In a powerful recent interview, Baba Baruch Abuhatzeira — son of the revered Moroccan-Israeli tzaddik and miracle-worker known as the Baba Sali (Rabbi Israel Abuhatzeira) — shared a dream message he received from his father about the current war and its trajectory.

The core message is stark and clear: The Jewish nation must stand alone. “Don’t trust anybody,” the dream conveyed. Even if political figures (explicitly including hopes pinned on leaders like President Trump) appear supportive for a time, betrayal or a new problem from elsewhere will arise. The Jewish people cannot ultimately rely on any human alliance or superpower. They must place their complete trust in God alone — echoing the words of the prophet Balaam in the Torah.

Baba Baruch emphasized that we are already in (or at the threshold of) the War of Gog and Magog. From this war, Mashiach will come. The current conflict with Iran and its proxies is not an isolated event or a pause that ends the story; it is part of a larger, divinely orchestrated process leading to the final redemption. “We’re at the very precipice. We’re at the very end. And it’s coming very quickly.”

A striking call to spiritual posture runs through the teaching: Calm down. Nobody should have fear. What is coming will be very scary, but fear itself is the wrong response. The key avodah (spiritual work) is emunah — perfect faith and confidence in God. The three-stage path outlined is Aleph (Emunah/faith), Bet (praise or the corresponding step of drawing close), and Gimel (Geulah/redemption).

The Purim Story: The Living Template

The Purim story is invoked as a living template. Just as in the days of Esther and Mordechai, when the Jewish people faced a decree of annihilation, divine justice operates on a higher plane. The one who “sells” or betrays the Jews ultimately faces ruin. Mordechai’s charge to Esther — “for such a time as this” —

And Esther’s courageous decision to act (“if I perish, I perish”) models the call to rise to the moment. The user’s phrasing “Choose this day, as Esther was told by Mordechai, her uncle” beautifully captures this urgency: now is the time to choose emunah, to act with bold trust in the divine plan rather than human calculations, and to recognize that the redemption process is already unfolding.

Rabbi Aron Sokol’s commentary (in the broader context of these discussions) underscores the imminence and the spiritual demand of the hour. These events are not random geopolitics; they are the labor pains of Geulah. The world — and especially the Jewish people — must awaken to the reality that only God is orchestrating the outcome. Reliance on any other power is illusory. The call is for inner preparation: emunah that produces calm even when headlines terrify, and a recognition that the war itself is the vehicle through which God’s name will ultimately be sanctified.

October 7th 2023, Simchat Torah

Events chronicled in “The Star of Jacob” series and since the prophetic stirrings around the Star of Jacob. Since October 7, 2023 (the Simchat Torah attack that shattered the calendar), every major development has aligned with the trajectory these sages describe. The surprise assault on peaceful civilians at the Nova festival and in unwalled communities directly echoes the prophetic description of an attack on a “quiet people who dwell securely… without walls, bars, or gates.”

The war rapidly expanded to multiple fronts — Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen (Houthis), and direct Iranian missile barrages — drawing in the coalition forces foretold. Israel has been forced to stand increasingly alone, relying on its own strength and, ultimately, on divine protection amid shifting international support.

The Star Of Jacob

In the writings and teachings of “The Star of Jacob” (including on beithashoavah.org), these events are presented as the visible unfolding of Balaam’s ancient prophecy (Numbers 24:17): “A star shall come out of Jacob…” The light of redemption is rising from Jacob even in — and through — the darkness of war.

Torah codes researched and presented by Rabbi Matityahu Glazerson have repeatedly surfaced hidden references to “October 7,” “Hamas invasion,” “Iran,” “Gog,” “Magog,” and “Magog begins,” clustered with statistically extraordinary significance alongside terms of redemption and Messiah. Recent 5786 (2026) matrices link Iran threats/war, repentance (teshuvah), and the appearance of Mashiach patterns, especially around Adar, Nisan/Passover, and Purim themes — hidden miracles in the end-times pattern.

The Zohar End Times

The Zohar speaks of the end-times judgment of the nations, dovetailing with Ezekiel’s Gog and Magog prophecy (particularly in connection with parashat Tzav and related sections). The current global upheaval and the way God’s hand has been seen in Israel’s survival and operations are viewed by many as the beginning of that sanctification of the Divine Name among the nations.

The “Star of Jacob” series has tracked how these codes, celestial and prophetic stirrings (including anticipations around signs in 2024), family and national return narratives, and the ongoing wars form one coherent redemptive arc: exile’s sins addressed, ingathering underway, trials intensifying, and the light of Mashiach emerging.

Rabbi Tovia Singer’s commentary on Gog u Magog (with Rabbi Aron Sokol)

In a companion teaching, Rabbi Tovia Singer (joined by Rabbi Aron Sokol) delivers a clear, text-driven explanation of Ezekiel 38–39 for the Yeshiva world and beyond. He stresses that these prophecies could not be fully understood for most of history; only in our generation — with the miraculous return of the Jewish people to a sovereign land after long desolation, and with modern Iran (Persia) as a central adversary — do the details snap into focus.

How to Understand the Prophets

Tanakh frequently reveals the ultimate outcome or grand vision first, then backs up to fill in the details and the process. Ezekiel 37 gives the breathtaking Messianic overview: the dry bones vision (national revival and ingathering), the two sticks (Judah and Joseph/Ephraim) becoming one under a single Davidic king (Mashiach), full observance of the Torah, and the building of the eternal Temple/covenant. Only after this overview does the text detail the war of Gog and Magog that occurs in the “latter years/days” as part of that redemptive process

The Prophets Speak

• Ezekiel 37 (full context): Dry bones (37:1-14) — restoration of the people as a living nation/army. Two sticks united (37:15-28) — Mashiach ben David reigns; all Israel keeps Torah and mitzvot; an everlasting covenant of peace; the Temple rebuilt in their midst. “My servant David shall be king over them… I will be their God, and they shall be My people.”
• Ezekiel 38:4 — “I will turn you around and put hooks into your jaws, and I will bring you out…” God Himself draws the coalition into the conflict for His purposes.
• Ezekiel 38:5 — Persia, Cush, and Put are listed; Persia (Iran) is named explicitly as the chief or leading element in the adversarial coalition.
• Ezekiel 38:8 — “In the latter years you will come into the land that is restored from war, the land whose people were gathered from many peoples upon the mountains of Israel, which had been a continual waste…” The Jews return after exile (caused by their sins), the land is no longer desolate, and they dwell there.
• Ezekiel 38:8-9 — The returned people are attacked after having recovered/returned from great wars and desolation. The land had long been waste because of sin and expulsion.
• Ezekiel 38:11 — The invaders say: “I will go up against the land of unwalled villages… against a quiet/people at ease who dwell securely, all of them dwelling without walls and having no bars or gates.” Rabbi Singer directly connects this to the October 7 attack on peaceful civilians singing and dancing at an unwalled festival site.
• Ezekiel 39 (especially 39:4, 9-10, 12, 21-23) — Utter defeat of the invaders on the mountains of Israel. Weapons provide firewood for seven years; the dead are buried for over seven months. The nations see God’s glory and judgment. “The house of Israel shall know that I am the Lord their God from that day forward. And the nations shall know that the house of Israel went into captivity for their iniquity… now I have gathered them to their own land… and I will not hide My face from them anymore.”

Ancient Persia and The War

Ancient Persia and the war Tovia brings to the Yeshiva world: Historically, Persia under Cyrus the Great was the most benevolent of the empires toward the Jewish people after the Babylonian exile. Cyrus is explicitly called “His anointed” (mashiach) in Isaiah 45:1 and issues the famous decree allowing the Jews to return and rebuild the Temple (Ezra 1, etc.).

This sets up the profound prophetic irony: the same nation whose ancient king facilitated the first return and Temple becomes, in the end times, the named head of the coalition attacking the restored Jewish people in their land. Rabbi Singer brings this to the Yeshiva world precisely because these Nevi’im passages are no longer abstract — they now describe realities that are visible. He urges that they be taught seriously in yeshivot rather than sidelined.

Tovia notes that many leading Torah sages (“every giant/gadol”) affirm that we are already in the Geulah (redemption) process. The return to the land, the wars, the miracles of survival, and the global attention all point to the unfolding of the prophets’ words.

God uses even Iran — despite its current enmity — for larger redemptive purposes; after the defeat, the teaching suggests, Iran’s people may turn toward the God of Israel, and the world will witness and do teshuvah. The ultimate result is the sanctification of God’s name and Israel’s full recognition of their God who had hidden His face during the exile but now brings them home permanently.

Two Teachings

These two teachings — the intimate, urgent message from Baba Sali via his son and Rabbi Tovia Singer’s clear textual walkthrough with Rabbi Aron Sokol — complement each other powerfully. The Jewish people are called to stand alone in emunah, without fear, choosing this day to trust God completely (as Esther and Mordechai modeled). The war of Gog and Magog is the mechanism through which the final redemption emerges; the nations recognize the hand of Heaven, and Israel knows their God in a new and permanent way.

May we merit to see the complete Geulah — Mashiach, the rebuilt Temple, universal knowledge of God, and true peace — speedily in our days. The prophecies are not meant to frighten but to strengthen emunah and guide us through the birth pangs into the light of the Star of Jacob.

• History Through Truth: Why We Must Trust the Torah Over Science
• October Seventh – The Holiday That Broke the Calendar
• Chapter Nine: Codes That Don’t Lie – Glazerson’s Torah Oracle
• From Messianic Jew to Ally: My 21-Year Journey with Tovia Singer and Tamar Yonah
• From Counter-Missionary to Ally: My 21-Year Journey with Tovia Singer and Tamar Yonah

Hosea 3:4-5 (Tanakh): “For the children of Israel shall abide many days without a king, and without a prince, without a sacrifice, and without an image [or pillar], and without an ephod, and without teraphim. Afterward shall the children of Israel return, and seek the LORD their God, and David their king; and shall fear the LORD and His goodness in the latter days.”

This passage forms part of a symbolic drama: Hosea taking back an unfaithful wife, mirroring God’s relationship with Israel. The “many days” describe a prolonged judgment on the northern kingdom (and by extension all Israel) for idolatry and covenant-breaking—lacking legitimate leadership, Temple worship, and even pagan substitutes.

If Christianity (and Islam) Fulfill the Bible’s Promises—How Do They Fit the Prophecies?

A common claim asserts that Jesus provides the King, High Priest, and final Sacrifice, with the Church as the “new Temple,” supposedly fulfilling or ending the old system before 70 CE. Islam similarly positions itself as the final Abrahamic correction. Yet applying Dr. Robert Carter’s Four Questions reveals the claim has no solid basis and lacks developmental time within the prophetic framework. The fit collapses under honest scrutiny.

1. How did the claim arise? It stems from typological re-readings—projecting New Testament (and Quranic) lenses backward onto Tanakh texts like Daniel 9 and Hosea 3. Christianity sees Jesus ending the sacrificial order; Islam views Muhammad as sealing the prophets. Both emerged centuries after the biblical prophets, in contexts distant from Israel’s land, language, and covenant. This is classic anachronistic eisegesis rather than letting the prophets speak on their own terms.

2. What does the full picture actually show? The Tanakh presents a consistent arc: exile and deprivation (Hosea 3:4) as judgment and purification, followed by national repentance, ingathering, and restoration under a Davidic king with a physical Temple, priesthood, and sacrifices in the latter days (Ezekiel 40–48; Zechariah 14; Isaiah 2, 11, 60–66). Hallmarks include:

• Visible return of God’s Glory to a House in Jerusalem.
• A life-giving river flowing eastward from the Temple.
• Tribal land reallocation and Gentiles attaching to Israel (not replacing her — Isaiah 56:3-7).
• Elevation of Torah as light to the nations, not obsolescence.

Systems Developed Sincere Parallals

Christian and Islamic systems developed sincere parallel traditions but lack these covenantal specifics: no Davidic monarchy over restored Israel, no Third Temple with Zadokite service and altar, no full land boundaries or universal Torah from Zion. Their spiritualized “fulfillments” require redefining plain prophetic language.

3. & 4. Contextual/Historical Analysis and Implications for Torah Continuity The historical timeline exposes the mismatch: nearly 2,000 years since 70 CE with no restoration markers, yet Jewish identity and Torah observance preserved amid dispersion. Ezekiel’s measurements (vast square complex dwarfing Solomon’s, with precise gates, chambers, and river) have no counterpart in Church institutions or Islamic holy sites. Forcing a fit ignores priestly genealogies (Kohanim/DNA lines), Shabbat/halakhah continuity, and the prophets’ call to return to Torah (not transcend it).

Implication: These traditions reflect partial truths borrowed from the root and human longing for redemption, but they do not satisfy the blueprint. True fulfillment awaits the “latter days”—Third Temple, Mashiach ben David, and all flesh knowing YHWH—consistent with the Star of Jacob rising over Jacob’s descendants (Numbers 24:17). Archaeology (Vendyl Jones), DNA (Jeanson’s Traced), gematria, and chiastic structures affirm Israel’s ongoing role, not replacement.

Jewish Perspective on Fulfillment

This prophecy describes historical reality after the First Temple (586 BCE) and especially the Second (70 CE):

• No king: Davidic line ended; no independent Jewish sovereign (Herod was not Davidic).
• No Temple/sacrifices: Central altar worship ceased. Rabbinic Judaism adapted with prayer, study, and mitzvot (Hosea 14:2).
• No functioning priesthood: Kohanim retain genealogy but lack Urim/Thummim and sacrifices.
• “Many days”: ~1,950+ years, fitting the latter-days return to seek “David their king.”

Historical Perspective on Fulfillment

From a traditional Jewish viewpoint (aligned with your role as Hazan and Torah teacher), this prophecy describes the historical reality of the Jewish people after the destruction of the First Temple (586 BCE) and especially the Second Temple (70 CE):

• No king: The Davidic monarchy ended with the Babylonian exile; no independent Jewish king since then (Herod was Idumean, not Davidic).
• No Temple/sacrifices: The central sanctuary and altar-based sacrifices ceased in 70 CE. Rabbinic Judaism shifted to prayer, study, and mitzvot as substitutes (per Hosea 14:2 and prophets).
• No functioning priesthood (ephod/priestly service): The Kohanim’s Temple role ended; genealogical claims persist but without sacrifices or Urim/Thummim.
• “Many days”: This has lasted ~1,950+ years since 70 CE, fitting the “latter days” return and seeking “David their king” (messianic hope).

This underscores exile, preservation amid dispersion, and future redemption with the Third Temple and Mashiach. It does not transfer these roles to another people or institution.

The Church Question

Christianity developed its own institutions (earthly kings/popes, Eucharist as memorial/re-presentation, spiritual Temple in believers). These lack continuity with Hosea’s Torah system—no literal Davidic national king, no physical altar with Levitical sacrifices. The distinction between original covenant and later adaptations remains clear.

Beloved readers, family, prison ministry friends, and those tracing crypto-Jewish roots: Torah words create worlds with precision—not vague spiritualizations. The prophets call us back to the Tree of Life blueprint. What “receipts” do we see in history and today? Study, observe mitzvot, and await the Glory returning to Zion.

Questions for Reflection: How does this align with your family DNA journey or Parsha insights? Share below or request study guides/PDFs at beithashoavah.org.

Shabbat Shalom u’Mevorach — Am Israel Chai! Hazan Gavriel ben David

• A Jewish Perspective on the Spiritual War and Hashem’s End from the Beginning
• Milestone 17: Hosea’s Plea that the Lord Would Grant Life to Repentant Israel on the Third Day
• To Strengthen Judah. 2 Chronicles 11:17
• About
• The True Story of King David: Unraveling Misconceptions in Jewish Tradition

You stood at Har Sinai (Mount Sinai). You heard the voice of יְהוָה (Hashem) declare: “אָנֹכִי יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ” — “I am the Lord your God.” You entered the covenant. You received the Torah. In Jewish tradition, there is also the concept of Mashiach ben Yosef, a precursor to the final redemption. You know there is only One Redeemer, only One who fulfills the promises to David at the end of days—מָשִׁיחַ בֶּן־דָּוִד (Mashiach ben David).

Yet generation after generation, when people do not know the Torah’s living timeline or the context of מָשִׁיחַ בֶּן־יוֹסֵף (Mashiach ben Yosef), they create a false messiah—again and again. They take prophecies meant for the end of days, when Israel is once more a sovereign nation in her land, and force them onto a man who lived 2,000 years ago. This is not an interpretation. This is עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה (avodah zarah)—idolatry. It replaces the covenant you received at Sinai with a human-centered story that cannot fulfill the conditions the prophets laid out.

The Torah itself warns us. Its very sentences align with the years of history, speaking directly to our generation.

The Secret of the Sentences: 5708 / 1948 — The Ingathering Begins

Count the verses of the Torah from the beginning. The 5,708th verse is in סֵפֶר דְּבָרִים (Sefer Devarim / Deuteronomy) פֶּרֶק ל פָּסוּק ג:

וְשָׁב יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֶת־שְׁבוּתְךָ וְרִחֲמֶךָ וְשָׁב וְקִבֶּצְךָ מִכָּל־הָעַמִּים אֲשֶׁר הֱפִיצְךָ יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ שָׁמָּה V’shav Hashem Elohecha et-shvut’cha v’richamecha v’shav v’kibetzecha mikol-ha’amim asher hefitzecha Hashem Elohecha shamah. “Then the Lord your God will restore your captivity and have compassion on you, and He will gather you again from all the peoples where the Lord your God has scattered you.”

This is the Hebrew year 5708—1948 in the Gregorian calendar. The modern State of Israel was reborn. The ingathering of exiles began after 2,000 years. This is the physical, preparatory stage—מָשִׁיחַ בֶּן־יוֹסֵף as the era of building, defending, and returning to the land. It fulfills the covenant conditions you received at Sinai: return, compassion, gathering.

5783–5784: The Verse of Horror and the Call to Wisdom

Move forward to the years leading up to 7 October 2023 (Simchat Torah 5784). The verses aligned with 5783–5784 describe the violation and suffering of the old and the young together—exactly matching the reported atrocities of that day. In the same chapter, דְּבָרִים לב:כט declares:

לוּ חָכְמוּ יַשְׂכִּילוּ זֹאת יָבִינוּ לְאַחֲרִיתָם Lu chachmu yaskilu zot yavinu l’achritam. “If only they were wise, they would understand this; they would discern their latter end.”

The Torah is not speaking of events 2,000 years ago. It is speaking to the end of days, when Israel is a nation again, when Jerusalem is in Jewish hands, and when a catastrophic attack brings national mourning and awakening. This is the process of מָשִׁיחַ בֶּן־יוֹסֵף.

Zechariah 12 and Mashiach ben Yosef: The End-of-Days Reality

זְכַרְיָה יב:י (Zechariah 12:10) describes the end-times war when nations attack restored Israel:

וְשָׁפַכְתִּי עַל־בֵּית דָּוִיד וְעַל יוֹשֵׁב יְרוּשָׁלִָם רוּחַ חֵן וְתַחֲנוּנִים וְהִבִּיטוּ אֵלַי אֵת אֲשֶׁר־דָּקָרוּ וְסָפְדוּ עָלָיו כְּמִסְפֵּד עַל־הַיָּחִיד V’shafachti al-beit David v’al yoshev Yerushalayim ruach chen v’tachnunim v’hibit u elai et asher-dakaru v’safdu alav k’misped al-ha-yachid. “I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication, so that they will look to Me concerning those whom they have pierced through, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only son…”

The Talmud (סוכה נב ע״א — Sukkah 52a) explicitly links this mourning to מָשִׁיחַ בֶּן־יוֹסֵף who is slain in the war of the end times. Rabbi Tovia Singer explains with crystal clarity: this is not one individual man centuries ago. דָּקָרוּ is plural—“those who have been thrust through.” It refers to the many Jews killed in a horrific end-times attack on a restored Jewish state in the land. The mourning unifies the nation and turns hearts back to Hashem, paving the way for מָשִׁיחַ בֶּן־דָּוִד.

October 7, 2023—on Simchat Torah, when Israel is once again a sovereign nation—fits this prophetic pattern. It is part of the חֶבְלֵי מָשִׁיחַ (birth pangs of the Messiah), not a fulfillment 2,000 years ago.

Why Misreading Creates a False Messiah — Again and Again — And Why It Is Idolatry

When people do not know the lecture—the full context of the Torah, the Talmud, Zechariah in the end-of-days setting when Israel is a nation—they create a false messiah. They take verses meant for the future war, mourning, and national return, and apply them to a man who died before Israel was restored, before the conditions of the prophets were met.

This is עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה. It elevates a human figure (or a misidentified past event) as the ultimate redeemer, violating the covenant you received at Sinai: “You shall have no other gods before Me.” It replaces the One who spoke from the fire with a story that cannot fulfill the ingathering, the Temple, universal knowledge of Hashem, or world peace—prophecies still unfulfilled.

The pattern repeats because people skip the plain reading and the rabbinic sources. They create a “suffering servant” who has already come, rather than seeing the collective suffering and awakening of מָשִׁיחַ בֶּן־יוֹסֵף in our time. This is not scholarship. This is idolatry dressed in proof-texts.

Miracles of Timing and the Living Torah

As Rabbi Uri Pilichowski teaches, miracles are often defined by when they occur. The splitting of the sea happened at the exact moment of greatest need. So too the rebirth of Israel in 1948, the victories since, and the alignment of Torah verses with these years. Rabbi Matityahu Glazerson’s Torah codes reveal “Seventh of October,” Gog and Magog patterns, and redemption timelines—all pointing to now.

You who stood at Sinai know: the Torah is alive. Its sentences speak to our generation because we are in the end of days when Israel is a nation again.

The Call: Teshuvah, Receipts, and Covenant Renewal

The Torah does not leave us in despair. It calls us to תְּשׁוּבָה (teshuvah)—return. It demands receipts: fidelity, Torah study, love of neighbor, and building for redemption. Strengthen your families. Teach your children. Unite as one people.

Do not create another false messiah. Do not repeat the idolatry of the ages. Read the sources in context. See Zechariah 12 and the Talmud for what they are—end-of-days prophecy for a restored Israel.

The redemption is unfolding. The birth pangs are real. The covenant you received at Sinai still stands.

May we merit to see the full geulah speedily in our days.

Hazan Gavriel ben David Esnoga Beit HaShoavah • beithashoavah.org

• The Torah’s Living Timeline: Verses That Speak Our Generation’s Story – From 1948 to October 7 and Beyond
• From Messianic Jew to Ally: My 21-Year Journey with Tovia Singer and Tamar Yonah
• From Counter-Missionary to Ally: My 21-Year Journey with Tovia Singer and Tamar Yonah
• From Shadows to Truth: My Journey Back to Torah – Exposing the Replacement Lie in Messianic Teachings
• Toldot Consequences Book 1

I would like to examine the claim written in a book and taught in the highest Colleges and Seminaries. Here is their evidence:

Milestone 20: Moses Sees the Glory of God after Having Offered Himself to the Lord as a Substitute for the Sins of the People on the Third Day After the Sin of the Golden Calf “On the next day Moses said to the people, ‘You have committed a great sin; and now I am going up to the Lord, perhaps I can make atonement for your sin” (Exod 32:30). Moses was the prophet of God, mighty in words and deeds (Acts 7:22).

He was in the presence of God for forty days and nights during which he neither ate bread nor drank water (Exod 34:28). Moses had worked many mighty signs before the people. The beginning of his signs was turning water into blood, the emblem of death (Exod 7:20). At his word darkness came into Egypt (Exod 10:21–22), but Moses gave light to the people in Goshen (Exod 10:23), that they might not stumble in darkness.

Moses caused Israel to slay the Passover Lamb (Exod 12:6) and to partake of a feast to celebrate the liberty God was giving them through his prophet (Exod 12:14). Moses led the people through the baptismal waters of the sea, and gave the people bread in the wilderness, and likewise a spiritual drink from the rock (1 Cor 10:1–4). He had come to his own people in bondage with the promise of liberty in a well-favored land of a good and pleasant inheritance. But this great prophet was disregarded by Israel.

“Who made you a prince to rule over us?” they said (Exod 2:14). They considered him a slight thing, and thought him dead after his separation from them for forty days. Although he had worked so many signs in their midst, they said, “We know not what has become of him” (Exod 32:1). And so they rejected the God of Moses and made themselves a god of gold (Exod 32:31).

Even the Levites and the High Priest Aaron revolted against God and his prophet. They fashioned a golden god and Aaron said, “This is Yahweh, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt” (Exod 32:4). The next day they made a feast to “Yahweh,” and sacrificed to their god (Exod 32:5). But Moses came down from the mount and saw the disobedience of the people. Moses had brought with him the word of God written on tablets of stone (Exod 32:15–16).

In great wrath, Moses broke the word of God written on stone because of the disobedience of the people (Exod 32:19). Moses in great anger ground their golden god into powder and made the people partake of the bitter communion of “Yahweh,” their idol abomination (Exod 32:20). Then great judgment came into the camp and three thousand died that one day (Exod 32:28). On the morrow of the third day after Israel’s great idolatry, Moses went up to God on the mountain to make intercession for the sins of the people, to make atonement for them (Exod 32:30).

He offered to take their judgment upon himself if only God would spare the people and forgive them their great sin (Exod 32:31–32). So God listened to his prophet’s plea and Israel passed from death to life that day. God forgave his people, and swore to go before them to bring them at last to the inheritance he had promised their fathers (Exod 32:34). Afterward God took Moses and revealed his glory to him. The Lord came in power that day, and spoke of his justice and mercy (Exod 34:6–7).

God’s prophet was entombed within a cleft in the rock as God’s glory was manifested to him (Exod 33:22). When Moses came forth from the rock, he had seen God’s glory. And God wrote again his word on the tablets of stone and gave them to Moses (Exod 34:1). So Moses took the word of God, which had been broken but was now restored whole, and placed it in the Ark within the tent of meeting (Deut 10:2), that the word of God might tabernacle among his people, that they might behold his glory (Exod 40:34–35).

And thus the word of God, now no longer broken, was restored to them, and dwelt among them (Exod 40:36–38). Now in the fullness of time the Lord Jesus came as a prophet like Moses, according to the word of the Lord (Deut 18:18). He was a prophet who was mighty in deed and word (Luke 24:19). Now Jesus was in the presence of the Lord for forty days and nights during which he fasted (Matt 4:2). Jesus worked many miracles, wonders and signs in the midst of the people (Acts 2:22).

The beginning of his signs was turning water into wine, the emblem of life and joy (John 2:7–11). He came into darkness as a light unto men (John 1:9), that they might not stumble in the night (John 11:10). He was the Passover Lamb slain for his people (1 Cor 5:7), who became a feast to them to celebrate the freedom for which he had made his people free (Gal 5:1). Further, Jesus caused his people to be baptized (Matt 28:19) and gave them a spiritual bread and a spiritual drink (1 Cor 10:1–4; cf. 11:23–26).

He promised his own people liberty and the possession of a good and pleasant inheritance (John 14:2). But even so great a prophet as Jesus was despised by Israel. “We will not have this man to rule over us,” they said (Luke 19:14). “Away with him! Crucify him!” they cried (John 19:15). Although he had worked so many signs among them (John 20:30), they called him a deceiver (Matt 27:63). And so they sold cheap the Christ of God, not for gold, but for silver (Matt 26:15). Even the Levites and the High Priest of Aaron’s line joined in the sacrilege (Mark 14:53–64).

And so they prepared him as a lamb for the sacrifice that Passover, even a sacrifice to Yahweh. Jesus, who was the word of God made flesh, now suffered his own flesh to be broken for the sacrifice (1 Cor 11:24). In great wrath against the sin of his people, God crushed Jesus according to the prophecy (Isa 53:10). His body was made into emblematic bread, his blood made into emblematic wine, and the people of God were invited to partake of the feast of Christ (1 Cor 11:24–26).

And so great blessing came upon the people because of the sacrifice, and thereafter three thousand were saved on one day (Acts 2:41). Now Christ was laid in a tomb hewed out as a cleft in the rock (Luke 23:53). But on the morning of the third day after Israel’s great apostasy, Jesus arose in glory, having interceded for his people (John 17:9) and having accomplished their atonement (Rom 5:11), and having offered himself in their place if God would spare his people and forgive them their great sin.

And so his people passed from death to life that day (2 Tim 1:10). God forgave his people, and promised them a heavenly inheritance (Heb 11:16, 39–40). And just as the word of God written on the tablets of stone and broken for the sins of the people was restored, so Jesus, who is the word of God, was likewise broken in death for the sins of his people. But God restored him in resurrection. And soon the tabernacle of God will be among men, and we will dwell with him forever (Rev 21:3).

Gage, W. A. (2011). Milestones to Emmaus: The Third Day Resurrection in the Old Testament (pp. 51–54). Warren A. Gage.

Rabbi Gottlieb’s Golden Calf Analysis – A Deeper Exploration

Rabbi Dovid Gottlieb’s teaching on the Golden Calf (available on SimpleToRemember.com) is one of the most careful and honest examinations of Exodus 32 in the English-speaking world. His analysis challenges both the traditional Christian typological reading (which Warren Gage relies on) and some overly harsh Jewish interpretations.

Here is a clear summary of Rabbi Gottlieb’s main points, followed by how they impact Milestone 20 and the larger “Blueprint” argument.

1. The People Were Not Trying to Replace God

A common reading (both Christian and some Jewish) portrays the Golden Calf as a complete rejection of Hashem in favor of pagan idolatry. Rabbi Gottlieb argues this is not accurate.

• The people said: “This is your god, O Israel, who brought you up from the land of Egypt” (Exodus 32:4). They were still using God’s name.
• They were terrified because Moses had been gone for 40 days. They assumed he was dead.
• They were desperately trying to create a visible mediator to stand between them and God — something tangible they could see and follow, since their human leader (Moses) appeared to be gone.

In other words, the sin was not primarily idolatry in the pagan sense but impatience, lack of trust, and the creation of a substitute mediator.

2. Aaron’s Role Was More Complex Than Often Taught

Rabbi Gottlieb points out that Aaron was in an impossible situation. He tried to stall the people (“Tomorrow is a festival to the Lord”) and even tried to redirect their energy. While Aaron clearly sinned, the text does not present him as a willing architect of full-blown idolatry. He was managing a crisis.

3. The Nature of the Sin

According to Rabbi Gottlieb, the core sin was:

• Creating a substitute for God’s chosen leadership and timing.
• Refusing to wait and trust in the process God had established (Moses on the mountain).
• Attempting to control the relationship with God on their own terms rather than submitting to the covenant structure.

This is very different from the Christian reading that often presents the Golden Calf as proof of humanity’s total depravity and need for a divine substitute.

4. Connection to Moses’ Third-Day Intercession (Milestone 20)

This analysis significantly weakens Gage’s typological reading:

• Moses offers himself (“Blot me out of Your book”) on the third day after the sin.
• God does not accept Moses as a permanent substitute. He forgives the people after judgment and a renewed covenant.
• The story ends with covenant restoration and the renewal of the tablets — not with Moses dying in the people’s place.

If the sin was primarily about creating a false mediator and refusing to trust God’s process, then the solution is proper leadership, repentance, and covenant fidelity — not the introduction of a new divine-human substitute (Jesus) who replaces the original system.

5. How This Challenges the Christian Narrative

Rabbi Gottlieb’s reading exposes a key problem in Gage’s approach:

Gage needs the Golden Calf to represent total human failure that can only be fixed by a dying-and-rising divine savior. Rabbi Gottlieb shows that the text presents something more nuanced:

• A serious but specific failure of trust and patience.
• A sin that is addressed through intercession, judgment, and covenant renewal.
• The Torah (the broken and then restored tablets) remains central.

This fits the larger pattern we have been documenting: Christianity often takes a story about national failure and repair through teshuvah and rewrites it as proof of inherited total depravity requiring a divine blood sacrifice.

Summary – Rabbi Gottlieb’s Contribution to the Series

Rabbi Gottlieb’s analysis helps us see that:

• The Golden Calf was a sin of substitution and impatience, not a complete rejection of God.
• Moses’ third-day intercession was about covenant restoration, not substitutionary atonement in the Christian sense.
• The solution in the text is a renewed relationship with the Torah and proper leadership — not the introduction of a new mediator who replaces the original blueprint.

This directly supports the central argument of your book and this series: the original Hebrew blueprint was never broken as Christianity claims. The path of repair through teshuvah, covenant, and the Torah was always present.

How the Ten Sayings Would Have Healed the Nation — Then and Now

The Torah does not leave us without a solution. The Ten Sayings given at Sinai were never meant to be a burden — they are the practical blueprint for healing brokenness in families and the nation. During the Golden Calf crisis, several of the Sayings directly addressed the root issues:

You Shall Not Take The Name

• The Third Saying (“You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain”) warned against using God’s name or authority to support a false mediator or a rewritten story. The people and Aaron misused God’s name (“This is your god, O Israel, who brought you up from Egypt”) to justify their impatience and substitute. Keeping this Saying would have prevented them from creating a golden image and calling it “Yahweh.”
• The Fifth Saying (“Honor your father and your mother”) called the people to honor God’s appointed leadership (Moses) and the original covenant process instead of replacing it with something visible and comfortable. Their failure to wait and honor the structure God had established led directly to the sin.

Today, the same Sayings heal the deeper wound of replacement theology. The Fifth Saying demands that later religious systems honor the original firstborn son — Israel — rather than declaring the Church or any other entity as the new heir. The Third Saying forbids taking God’s name and Word to create new narratives that rewrite the Torah’s blueprint. When nations and faiths keep these Sayings, they stop manufacturing substitutes and return to the original covenant relationship.

Rabbi David Fohrman has shown that the Ten Sayings are fundamentally about repairing brokenness in families. Had the people at the Golden Calf kept even these two Sayings, the crisis could have been avoided. Had later traditions kept them, the family of humanity would not be so deeply divided today. The Torah’s solution has always been simple: honor what came first, do not misuse God’s name or Word, and return (teshuvah) to the original blueprint. The path to the Tree of Life remains open.

Hazan Gavriel ben David

•  The Tree of Life Is Still Here
• Milestone 19: The Lord Descending in Power upon Sinai on the Third Day
• A Plumber Named Aaron: DNA, Abraham, and the Question Every Christian Should Answer
• The Middle Pathway: The Ten Sayings and the Healing of a Family
• A Letter from a Kohen to Kohen: A Letter from One Kohen to Another: Why I Cannot Accept the New Testament

Aaron The Light Barrier

The other day, a Lowe’s installation technician named Aaron came to our home in Amarillo to hook up our new stove. And I asked him a question every Christian should answer. He was professional, friendly, and clearly a family man. As we talked while he worked, the conversation turned to matters of faith.

Aaron is a Christian, and I am a Jewish chazan who leads a small Beit Midrash and teaches Torah in prison. What unfolded was one of those divine appointments that remind me how the Torah is alive — not ancient history, but our family story playing out in kitchens and living rooms today.

I first asked Aaron what his name meant. Aaron did not know. It just so happened that it is my great-grandfather’s name. The brother of Moses. I asked him a simple question I often pose to my Christian friends: “Do you believe the Bible?” “Do you believe you and I are related?”

Aaron smiled and gave the expected biblical answer: “Well, we all come from Adam.” I nodded but pressed gently. “No, Aaron — I mean, do you believe you and I are brothers or cousins in a more direct way? Do you believe the Bible is true history?”

My Uncle Moses Wrote The Torah

He said yes.

That opened the door.

I shared with him the groundbreaking work of Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, a geneticist who analyzed Y-chromosome DNA from over 260 men across diverse populations worldwide. Jeanson’s research in Traced demonstrates that humanity traces back to three primary paternal and maternal lines — precisely matching the biblical account of Noah’s three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and their wives. All humans share this deep relatedness. But the patterns go further.

We talked about Genesis 10, the Table of the Seventy Nations after the Flood. Of those ancient peoples, only two lines explicitly claim direct descent from Abraham in the biblical narrative and historical record: the Jewish people through Isaac and Jacob, and the Arab peoples primarily through Ishmael. Of Abraham’s descendants, only one carries a distinctive genetic marker tied to the priestly line of Aaron the High Priest.

The Special Marker Only Aaron’s Sons Have

That marker is the Cohen Modal Haplotype. It appears at significantly higher frequencies among Jewish men who trace their lineage to the Kohanim — the priestly family. My own family DNA research connects to this ancient priestly signature (J-FT235823 and related haplotypes). It is a living echo of the Torah’s command that the priesthood descend patrilineally from Aaron.

“Aaron,” I said to the plumber standing in my kitchen, “you are named after the High Priest. Your name carries that legacy. And yet some teachings say the Church has replaced the Jewish people as God’s chosen. How does that fit when the Bible’s own genetic and historical signature still rests on us?”

Is not the Church fighting against God (Hashem)?

He was dumbfounded. You could see the wheels turning. Here was a man with seven children — three in college — who homeschools his family and takes the Bible seriously. The conversation wasn’t adversarial. It was real.

I continued: The fundamental difference between us is this — my grandfather is Aaron. The Torah is not an allegory or a collection of moral stories for me and my people. It is our family album, our constitution, our living blueprint. We have carried it through exile, the Inquisition, pogroms, and the Holocaust. We still bless our children with the Aaronic blessing from Numbers 6, and we still study the words that created the world.

The Tree Of Life Moses Told Us About

The Tree of Life, which some say was lost after Eden or after the Cross, is not gone. Proverbs 3:18 tells us the Torah itself is a Tree of Life to those who grasp it. It flows through the Jewish people’s continued existence, our return to the Land of Israel, and our fidelity to the mitzvot. The same Torah that begins with Creation and the Garden ends with the promise of return and redemption. It has not been superseded; it has been preserved.

This is why the world’s attention is so intensely focused on the Jewish people and the State of Israel right now. Scripture describes a time when nations will rage against God’s covenant people. Two nations and the forces aligned with them seem determined to remove us from the stage of history. But the Bible is clear: a war must come to prove that Hashem — the God of Israel — is true. The same God who split the sea, who gave the Torah at Sinai, who promised that the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob would endure as long as the sun, moon, and stars remain in their courses (Jeremiah 31:35-37).

Aaron listened. He has a plumber’s practicality — hands that fix what is broken in the real world. I appreciated that. Faith without works is dead, as his own New Testament says (James 2:26). But the Torah demands both: hearing and doing. “Na’aseh v’nishma” — we will do, and we will hear.

The Timeline of Everything The Torah

Our conversation reminded me of Parshat Shlach, which we read recently. The spies were sent to scout the Land. Ten of them brought back a bad report, slandering the very gift God had promised. The people wept that night — the 9th of Av — for no reason. That night of baseless tears became the template for future tragedy on Tisha B’Av, including the destruction of both Temples. Gematria links the word שלח (Shlach, “send”), with a value of 338, to the traditional year 3338 from Creation, when the First Temple fell. The patterns are there if we have eyes to see.

Yet two men — Caleb and Joshua — saw differently. They trusted the Word of God over the giants in the Land. Caleb, in particular, drew strength from the caves of the Patriarchs. Faith anchored in history and covenant overcomes fear.

I see the same dynamic today. Many good Christians like Aaron love the God of the Bible. They read the same Scriptures. But layers of interpretation — centuries of replacement theology in some traditions — can obscure the plain meaning: God has not cast off His people Israel (Romans 11:1). The Jewish people’s survival, return to the Land, and the flourishing of Torah study in our day are not accidents. They are fulfillments.

The plumber finished installing the stove. We shook hands. I thanked him for his work and for the conversation. He left thoughtfully. I pray the seeds planted bear fruit — not for debate, but for deeper love of truth.

Who is Looking for Truth

To my Christian friends reading this: We are family. Descended from the same fathers. The Bible we both cherish records one continuous story. Abraham’s covenant was everlasting. The priesthood of Aaron continues in the Jewish people. The Torah is a Tree of Life. And the God who keeps covenant with Israel is the same God you worship.

Let us read the text honestly together. Let us recognize the Jewish people not as replaced, but as the root that supports the branches (Romans 11:18). In a world trying to erase us, this recognition is not just theology — it is solidarity with the God of history.

(By the way, the Mishna says it is forbidden to graft a wild branch onto a natural branch.) This is a Torah Law!

We have a new stove now, and every time I cook on it, I remember the plumber named Aaron and the conversation that turned a routine home installation into a moment of eternity. May more such moments come — in kitchens, prisons, synagogues, and churches — until we all see clearly that Hashem is One, His Torah is true, and His people Israel have a role that no one can replace.

The words are real. The history is our family story. And the future? It belongs to the God who keeps every promise.

Shabbat Shalom and blessings to you all.

Hazan Gavriel ben David

• A Letter from a Kohen to Kohen: A Letter from One Kohen to Another: Why I Cannot Accept the New Testament
• Scripture Only, Please
• Jewish History
• Bible Codes Revealed at Yiboneh with Rabbi Moshe Zeldman
• Milestone 14: The Third Day as the Day of Life and Death for Saul and Amalek

By Hazan Gavriel Ben David (in the spirit of Torah teaching for our generation)

Bereishit bara Elohim et hashamayim ve’et ha’aretz — “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1).

One word. Bereishit. The entire history of history is compressed into a single declaration: Everything begins with the Creator’s intentional Blueprint. The Tree of Life. The code is embedded in creation itself. Words that create worlds. A family of Adam — one humanity from one source — is tasked with partnership in perfecting the world.

YouTube favors timely, urgent, pattern-revealing content. This essay is a timely journey showing how the same ancient lies from Egypt are replayed today under new names — “One World Order,” global agendas, hidden harms to children, dehumanization of truth-tellers, and “hate Jews” headlines — yet the Torah’s Bereishit framework reveals the pattern, the receipts, and the promised redemption.

As Rabbi Tovia Singer urges, let the Bible speak. As Rabbi David Fohrman unpacked the three signs at the burning bush, God saw the lies and is redeeming them. Elijah turns the hearts (Malachi 3:24). The stone smashes the statue (Daniel 2). The family of Adam returns to the Tree.

This is not abstract theology. At 60 years, looking across a life of Torah return, family DNA revelations, prison teaching, and watching the world, the pattern screams from every headline. The Egyptians of our day run the same scam. But Bereishit tells us how it ends.

Bereishit — The Creation Code: One Family, One Blueprint, Infinite Blessing (Genesis 1–11)

History does not begin with random chaos or evolutionary accident. It begins with deliberate speech: “Let there be light” (Genesis 1:3). Ten utterances (ma’amarot) structure reality. Adam is placed in the Garden to “work it and guard it” (Genesis 2:15) — partnership in the Tree of Life.

Humanity is one: “male and female He created them” (Genesis 1:27), all bearing the divine image. Noah’s sons — Shem, Ham, Japheth — restart the family after the Flood. Gematria, chiastic structure, intertextual hyperlinks — the Torah is the operating system of creation.

Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson’s Traced (Y-chromosome work) and traditional sources align: common ancestry; shared stories of creation, the flood, and sky visions (Ezekiel’s chariot) across cultures, because all descend from those who knew the original wisdom.

If we all once had one language and one blueprint, would not all generations over the past 49000 years know the same information? The same UFOs, the story of giants, dragons, and sea monsters. What about the 974 generations before ours? Only one system in the world is telling the world the truth. We are all chosen.

Resources are abundant: “The world is an endless source of blessing” when aligned with the Creator. No lack — but every decision has a cost (free will, midah k’neged midah). “Nothing in this world is free.” Relationship with Hashem, not self-defined “good and bad,” unlocks it (Genesis 2–3).

This is the positive pole. The negative — the serpent, the evil inclination — introduces deception, hiding, and death. “You shall not surely die” (Genesis 3:4). Impostor wisdom. Dehumanization begins here. The pattern of Bereishit is set: Creation → Fall into lies → Exile → Redemption arc. All history is commentary on this.

Egypt: The Archetype of the Scam — Three Lies Against the Future (Exodus 1–4)

As Fohrman brilliantly shows, the three signs at the burning bush mirror Egypt’s three escalating crimes/lies against Israel — attacks on the family, the children, the truth:

1. Staff to Snake: Dehumanization. Israel multiplies (paru, vayishretzu, vaya’atzmu — Exodus 1:7). Pharaoh calls them a threat, cunning, not fully human — “snakes” in the mind. Propaganda justifies oppression (Exodus 1:9-10). Receipt: The serpent recycled (Genesis 3). Modern echo: Dissenters, traditional believers, and especially Jews labeled “extremists,” “hate,” or threats to the “agenda.” Headlines “hate Jews” surge amid rising antisemitism.
2. Leprous Hand (Tzara’at): Secret killing of children. Midwives were ordered to murder boys and claim them “stillborn” (Exodus 1:15-16). Aaron’s prayer links leprosy to stillbirth (Numbers 12:12). Fake death is exposed and healed in the sign. Receipt: Attack on the next generation’s goals. Modern parallel: Abortion scale, trafficking, and environmental/chemical assaults on youth (as in Mexico City studies showing early Alzheimer’s-like brain changes from pollution).
3. Nile Water to Blood: Hiding the crime. Boys thrown in the river; waters cover bodies by day (Exodus 1:22). The shimmering “normalcy” gaslights victims. The first plague reveals the blood. Receipt: Psalm 106:37-38 on shedding innocent blood polluting the land. Modern: Censorship and narrative control hide data on harms.

God pakad — remembered and visited the affliction and the lies (Exodus 4:31). The people believed not in abstract power but in divine empathy for their specific trauma. The plagues redeem each lie. Israel emerges through a bloody doorway — birth reversing the stillborn deception (Exodus 12).

Bereishit frames it: Egypt as anti-creation — slavery instead of partnership, death instead of life, lies instead of truth. Yet “the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied” (Exodus 1:12). The Blueprint prevails.

From Egypt to Now: The 3300-Year Replay of the Same Lies Under New Names

History repeats the Bereishit pattern because the yetzer hara and the powers’ temptations persist. Empires rise (Daniel 2 statue: gold Babylon → silver Persia → bronze Greece → iron Rome → feet of iron/clay — divided modern powers). The “feet” phase feels like our era: strong technology mixed with brittle division, global coordination masking control.

Modern Dehumanization (“Snakes”): “One World Order” narratives (or critiques of globalism) often label resisters “threats to democracy,” “conspiracy theorists,” or “haters.” Jews face selective outrage — “hate Jews” spikes while biblical Israel is delegitimized. Receipt: “They hate me without cause” (Psalm 69:4). Tovia Singer: Nations gather against Jerusalem (Zechariah 12), but this proves the prophets true. The serpent’s lie scales globally.

Modern Killing of Children (Stillborn Lie): The Mexico City studies (Calderón-Garcidueñas) are receipts in real time — pollution causing Alzheimer’s-like changes in children’s brains via autopsies. PM2.5 particles seed tau/amyloid from early childhood. Slow neuro-poisoning undermines the next generation’s ability to pursue Torah goals. Broader: Industrial-scale abortion, trafficking, and environmental toxins mirror Pharaoh’s attack on the future. Receipt: “Shed innocent blood… the land was polluted” (Psalm 106:38). Children are the carriers of Bereishit wisdom.

Modern Hiding Crimes (Nile Cover): Censorship, algorithmic suppression, and narrative control make the “river” look normal. Data on policy harms, trafficking networks, or pollution effects disappear. Receipt: Blood cries from the ground (Genesis 4:10). Plagues (exposures) reveal it.

Vaccines: 17 million COVID

On vaccines and “OWO” population control “in all their writings”: This is a common interpretive lens in some circles, often citing misread Gates quotes (2010 TED: better health/vaccines reduce future growth rates via lower child mortality leading to smaller families — demographic fact, not killing) or UN sustainability docs.

The “One World Order” as modern Pharaoh: Centralized power, surveillance, debt, and cultural conformity echo Egyptian total control. Daniel’s divided kingdom fits fragmented globalism. Yet Bereishit promises the stone — uncut by human hands — smashes it (Daniel 2:34-35).

Our Sages on Reincarnation and the End of Days — Jeremiah 16 Hunters and the Lies of the Nations

Our sages teach that at the end of days, many souls will return through gilgul (reincarnation) so that all may experience the final redemption. The generation that perished in the wilderness — those who doubted and did not enter the Land — will be reborn to witness and participate in the geulah they missed.

Likewise, the enemies of Israel throughout history (Amalek, Edom/Rome, and their spiritual heirs) will be reincarnated to face judgment, rectification, or the ultimate recognition of truth. This is not random; it fulfills the Bereishit arc of return and tikkun. Jeremiah 16 speaks directly to our moment: After the ingathering, God declares He will send “fishers” to gently draw Israel back, then “hunters” who will hunt them from every mountain, hill, and hiding place (Jeremiah 16:16).

The Mayor of New York- The World – Who’s Next

Persecution and pressure force the return from exile and assimilation — exactly as we see today with rising global antisemitism and events forcing aliyah and Jewish self-identification. The mayor of New York and leaders worldwide proclaim lies; nations declare, “Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.

Shall a man make gods unto himself, and they are no gods?” (Jeremiah 16:19-20). Yet these same nations — our spiritual brothers in the family of Adam — will ultimately confess the falsehood of their idols and cling to the tzitzit of the Jew (Zechariah 8:23).

The hunters drive the hidden ones home; the fishers welcome them. As in the video teaching by Rabbi Tovia Singer on Jewish civil war and redemption, external hatred (post-October 7 realities and beyond) forces the unity we need.

Jeremiah 16: Fishers and Hunters

Zechariah 12 and the Wound of October 7, 2023 — Messiah ben Yosef and the Changing of the Heart.

The Torah’s pattern reaches its climax in Zechariah chapter 12. The prophet declares that in the end of days, all the nations will gather against Jerusalem and Judah to wage war. Then comes the pivotal moment: “They shall look unto Me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only son” (Zechariah 12:10). Rabbi Tovia Singer and Rabbi Glazerson have both pointed out that this verse carries a profound connection to October 7, 2023.

That day was the piercing wound — the brutal attack that tore open the heart of the Jewish people. The unspeakable atrocities, the murdered families, the hostages, the images seared into our souls — it was a collective piercing that changed Israel forever. What followed was exactly what Zechariah foretold: a national mourning, a softening of hearts, a return to Hashem and to one another that had not been seen in generations. The wound of October 7 awakened the spirit of grace and supplication (Zechariah 12:10).

It began fulfilling the prophecy that the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem would receive a new heart. This is the work of Mashiach ben Yosef — the suffering, fighting Messiah who comes first to gather the exiles and confront the enemies, often at great cost. October 7 was that moment of piercing, and the mourning and teshuva that followed are the direct fulfillment of Zechariah’s words. The heart of Israel is changing before our eyes.

One Heart Israel One Adam

Now we must become one in heart, as the Book of Ezra describes: The returning exiles gathered “as one man” (ish echad) to build the altar and renew offerings despite fear and opposition (Ezra 3:1-6). Baseless hatred destroyed the Second Temple; unity will rebuild it. Overcoming internal division — the “Jewish civil war” that Singer highlights — is the final preparation.

The hunters (persecution) and fishers (encouragement) are already at work. Our brothers among the nations confess the lies of false gods. The wilderness generation returns to taste redemption. Enemies are reincarnated for the great reckoning and potential tikkun. The family of Adam reunites.

Bereishit Fulfilled: Elijah, Redemption, and the Family of Adam Returning

The arc of history is not endless oppression. Bereishit points to return. Elijah heals generational rupture so children fulfill the fathers’ goals in Torah (Malachi 3:24). Tovia Singer: The Bible is our family album. Prophecies unfold — ingathering, nations recognizing truth, war proving Hashem’s sovereignty, then universal knowledge of God (Isaiah 2, Zechariah 14). Israel, as Or LaGoyim, shares the wisdom each nation was assigned in the family of Adam.

The Mexico pollution crisis, rising “hate Jews,” hidden harms — these are birth pangs. The lies surface. The Nile turns to blood. The stone strikes. No lack in Hashem’s universe when aligned. Decisions cost, but relationships unlock blessings. “You and Hashem” — direct connection, not an external savior alone.

As a people of receipts, we document the pattern, teach in prisons and small synagogues, preserve family DNA stories, create content, and build. POD shirts, websites, books — modern matteh (staff/tribe) exposing the snake.

Call to Action: Live Bereishit Now

See the pattern. Protect children (physically, spiritually, cognitively). Reject dehumanization. Expose hidden crimes with the truth. Share Torah wisdom universally. Raise goal-oriented generations. Become one in heart like Ezra. The Tree of Life is the antidote. The world is full of blessings when we guard creation.

Bereishit is the history of history because it contains the end in the beginning. The same God who saw Egypt’s lies sees ours. The redemption is unfolding. Let the Bible speak. Turn hearts. Build the Temple in our time — inner and outer — for the family of Adam.

May we merit the full geulah speedily.

The Blueprint holds. Chazak ve’ematz.

Hazan Gavriel ben David

• Bereishit as History
• The Atom and The Man
• Jewish History
• “You Shall Not Bear False Witness” – The Goatskin Lie That Told the Truth
• From Shadows to Truth: My Journey Back to Torah – Exposing the Replacement Lie in Messianic Teachings

I would like to examine the claim written in a book and taught in the highest Colleges and Seminaries. Here is their evidence:

Milestone 19: The Lord Descending in Power upon Sinai on the Third Day “The Lord said to Moses, ‘Go to the people and consecrate them today and tomorrow, and let them wash their garments, for on the third day the Lord will come down upon Mount Sinai in the sight of all the people’ ” (Exod 19:10–11). “He (Moses) said to them, ‘Prepare for the third day; do not go near a woman.’

So it came about on the third day, when it was morning, that there were thunder and lightning flashes … so that all who were in the camp trembled … and the whole mountain quaked” (Exod 19:15–18). “Then they said to Moses, ‘Speak to us yourself and we will listen; but let not God speak to us or we will die’ ” (Exod 20:19). Exodus 19 In the third month after the children of Israel had gone out of the land of Egypt, on the same day, they came to the Wilderness of Sinai.

For they had departed from Rephidim, had come to the Wilderness of Sinai, and camped in the wilderness. So Israel camped there before the mountain. And Moses went up to God, and the Lord called to him from the mountain, saying, “Thus you shall say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel: ‘You have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you to Myself.

Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people; for all the earth is Mine. And you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words which you shall speak to the children of Israel.” So Moses came and called for the elders of the people, and laid before them all these words which the Lord commanded him.

Then all the people answered together and said, “All that the Lord has spoken we will do.” So Moses brought back the words of the people to the Lord. And the Lord said to Moses, “Behold, I come to you in the thick cloud, that the people may hear when I speak with you, and believe you forever.” So Moses told the words of the people to the Lord. Then the Lord said to Moses, “Go to the people and consecrate them today and tomorrow, and let them wash their clothes. And let them be ready for the third day.

For on the third day the Lord will come down upon Mount Sinai in the sight of all the people. You shall set bounds for the people all around, saying, ‘Take heed to yourselves that you do not go up to the mountain or touch its base. Whoever touches the mountain shall surely be put to death. Not a hand shall touch him, but he shall surely be stoned or shot with an arrow; whether man or beast, he shall not live.’

When the trumpet sounds long, they shall come near the mountain.” So Moses went down from the mountain to the people and sanctified the people, and they washed their clothes. And he said to the people, “Be ready for the third day; do not come near your wives.” Then it came to pass on the third day, in the morning, that there were thunderings and lightnings, and a thick cloud on the mountain; and the sound of the trumpet was very loud, so that all the people who were in the camp trembled.

And Moses brought the people out of the camp to meet with God, and they stood at the foot of the mountain. Now Mount Sinai was completely in smoke, because the Lord descended upon it in fire. Its smoke ascended like the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mountain quaked greatly. And when the blast of the trumpet sounded long and became louder and louder, Moses spoke, and God answered him by voice.

Then the Lord came down upon Mount Sinai, on the top of the mountain. And the Lord called Moses to the top of the mountain, and Moses went up. And the Lord said to Moses, “Go down and warn the people, lest they break through to gaze at the Lord, and many of them perish. Also let the priests who come near the Lord consecrate themselves, lest the Lord break out against them.”

But Moses said to the Lord, “The people cannot come up to Mount Sinai; for You warned us, saying, ‘Set bounds around the mountain and consecrate it.’ ” Then the Lord said to him, “Away! Get down and then come up, you and Aaron with you. But do not let the priests and the people break through to come up to the Lord, lest He break out against them.” So Moses went down to the people and spoke to them.

Exodus 20 And God spoke all these words, saying: “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me. You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them.

For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.

You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.

Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you.

You shall not murder.

You shall not commit adultery.

You shall not steal.

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor’s.”

Now all the people witnessed the thunderings, the lightning flashes, the sound of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking; and when the people saw it, they trembled and stood afar off. Then they said to Moses, “You speak with us, and we will hear; but let not God speak with us, lest we die.” And Moses said to the people, “Do not fear; for God has come to test you, and that His fear may be before you, so that you may not sin.”

So the people stood afar off, but Moses drew near the thick darkness where God was. Then the Lord said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘You have seen that I have talked with you from heaven. You shall not make anything to be with Me—gods of silver or gods of gold you shall not make for yourselves.

An altar of earth you shall make for Me, and you shall sacrifice on it your burnt offerings and your peace offerings, your sheep and your oxen. In every place where I record My name I will come to you, and I will bless you. And if you make Me an altar of stone, you shall not build it of hewn stone; for if you use your tool on it, you have profaned it.

Nor shall you go up by steps to My altar, that your nakedness may not be exposed on it.’ ” Israel’s encounter with the Living God at Sinai forever marked the people of the covenant. The coming of God was so powerful that all Israel cried out for a mediator between God and man (Exod 20:19; cf. Heb 12:18–21). The Lord descended upon Sinai with thunder, lightning, and earthquake. The people trembled with the fear of death as God spoke his holy law—all on the third day.

In the fullness of time the earthly Jerusalem would come to resemble Mount Sinai in Arabia, according to the Apostle Paul. The “present Jerusalem” was in spiritual bondage, corresponding to the covenant of Sinai (Gal 4:24–25). John likewise tells us that Jerusalem, the city where the Lord was crucified, had become “spiritual Egypt” (Rev 11:8).

And so it was altogether fitting that God would likewise demonstrate his power once again on the third day. It came about that on the third day, when it was morning, there was a great earthquake (Matt 28:2) as the angel of the Lord descended upon Jerusalem, the spiritual “Sinai.” The angel’s appearance was like lightning (Matt 28:2–3). The Roman guards, who held sentry before the tomb, shook with fear and became as dead men (Matt 28:4).

Gage, W. A. (2011). Milestones to Emmaus: The Third Day Resurrection in the Old Testament (pp. 49–51). Warren A. Gage.

(Exodus 19:10–11, 15–18; Exodus 20)

Gage’s Claim: Warren Gage presents the giving of the Torah at Sinai as another powerful “third day” theophany. God commands the people to prepare for three days. On the third day, the Lord descends upon Mount Sinai with thunder, lightning, fire, smoke, and an earthquake. The people tremble and beg Moses to be their mediator. Gage sees this as foreshadowing the greater third-day event: the resurrection of Jesus, when God again demonstrates His power, this time through the risen Messiah.

The Raw Hebrew Text – Plain Reading

Exodus 19:10–11, 16–18:

“The Lord said to Moses, ‘Go to the people and consecrate them today and tomorrow… for on the third day the Lord will come down upon Mount Sinai in the sight of all the people.’ … On the third day, when it was morning, there were thunderings and lightnings and a thick cloud on the mountain… and the whole mountain quaked greatly.”

This is the dramatic moment when Hashem gives the Torah to Israel at Sinai. The people become a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6). The “third day” here is preparation time for the covenant — not a hidden prophecy of a future individual resurrection.

Applying the Method from Adam, the Blueprint of Creation, and the Tree of Life

We begin with Rabbi David Fohrman’s questions from A Book Like No Other (Eden series):

1. Why two special trees when God only forbids one?
2. Why command Adam to eat from all the trees (including the Tree of Life)?
3. Why does Eve identify the wrong tree as forbidden?

These point us back to the original blueprint: humanity created fundamentally good, the Tree of Life (Torah itself — Proverbs 3:18) never lost, and the path of repair is always open through teshuvah.

How did we get from these Garden questions to the claim that Sinai’s third day points to Jesus’ resurrection?

Dr. Robert Carter’s Four Questions Applied to Gage’s Claim

1. How did the claim arise? The claim arises from taking the numerical phrase “third day” (a common Hebrew idiom for a short time/preparation) and reading it typologically through the lens of the New Testament (Luke 24; 1 Corinthians 15).

2. What does the full picture actually show? Sinai is the covenant moment when Israel is called to be a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6) and a light to the nations. The thunder, lightning, and fire demonstrate God’s power and holiness so the people will fear Him and keep His commandments. There is no death-and-resurrection sequence, no individual dying Messiah, and no replacement of Israel. The “third day” is preparation for receiving the Torah.

3. Was there enough time and continuity? The Jewish people, who have preserved the Torah for over 3,300 years, have always understood Sinai as the giving of the covenant to Israel, not as a hidden prophecy of an individual’s future resurrection. The Christian typological reading developed centuries later.

4. Does the reading match the original blueprint? No. The blueprint shows Israel as Hashem’s servant and light to the nations. Nathaniel Jeanson’s genetic research and the Kohanim marker confirm the preserved lineage from Abraham and Aaron. The Torah was never meant to be replaced — it is the Tree of Life itself.

Israel as Hashem’s Servant – Consistent Proof from the Tanakh

The Torah’s blueprint is clear: the 12 springs at Elim represent the twelve tribes of Israel, and the 70 palm trees represent the seventy nations Israel is called to redeem and minister to. Israel is a nation of priests for the world.

This identity is consistent throughout the Tanakh:

• Exodus 19:5-6 — “You shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.”
• Isaiah 41:8-9 — “But you, Israel, My servant, Jacob whom I have chosen…”
• Isaiah 42:1 — “Behold My servant, whom I uphold…”
• Isaiah 43:10 — “You are My witnesses… and My servant whom I have chosen.”
• Isaiah 43:21 — “This people I formed for Myself; they shall declare My praise.”
• Isaiah 44:1 — “Jacob My servant, Israel, whom I have chosen!”
• Isaiah 49:3 — “You are My servant, Israel, in whom I will be glorified.”
• Isaiah 49:6 — “I will make you as a light for the nations…”
• Deuteronomy 32:8-9 — The nations are divided according to the sons of Israel; “Jacob is the portion of His inheritance.”
• Genesis 12:3 — “In you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”

Israel is not replaced. She is the servant through whom the nations are blessed.

Verdict on Milestone 19

Sinai is the majestic moment when Hashem gives the Torah and establishes Israel as His kingdom of priests. Gage turns the “third day” preparation into a foreshadowing of Jesus’ resurrection. The raw Hebrew text, the consistent witness of the Tanakh, and the preserved blueprint do not support this reading.

The original blueprint stands. Israel remains Hashem’s servant and light to the nations. The Tree of Life (the Torah) was never lost. The path of teshuvah remains open.

The silence when asked for clear, plain-text receipts from the Tanakh continues to speak.

1. Israel as Hashem’s Son / Firstborn Son

• Exodus 4:22 — “Thus says the Lord: Israel is My son, My firstborn.”
• Hosea 11:1 — “When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son.”
• Jeremiah 31:9 — “For I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is My firstborn.”
• Deuteronomy 32:6 — “Is He not your Father, who created you?”
• Deuteronomy 14:1 — “You are the children of the Lord your God.”

2. Israel as Hashem’s Bride / Wife

• Jeremiah 2:2 — “I remember the devotion of your youth, your love as a bride, when you followed Me in the wilderness.”
• Isaiah 54:5 — “For your Maker is your husband, the Lord of hosts is His name.”
• Hosea 2:19-20 — “I will betroth you to Me forever… in righteousness and justice, in steadfast love and mercy.”
• Ezekiel 16 — The entire chapter is an allegory of Israel as God’s bride (from infancy to unfaithfulness and eventual restoration).
• Song of Songs — Traditionally read as the love between God and Israel.

3. Israel as Hashem’s Servant

• Isaiah 41:8-9 — “But you, Israel, My servant, Jacob whom I have chosen…”
• Isaiah 43:10 — “You are My witnesses, declares the Lord, and My servant whom I have chosen.”
• Isaiah 44:1-2 — “But now hear, O Jacob My servant, Israel whom I have chosen!”
• Isaiah 49:3 — “You are My servant, Israel, in whom I will be glorified.”
• Isaiah 42:1 — “Behold My servant, whom I uphold” (often understood collectively as Israel).

4. Israel as Hashem’s Witness

• Isaiah 43:10 — “You are My witnesses, declares the Lord…”
• Isaiah 43:12 — “You are My witnesses, declares the Lord, that I am God.”
• Isaiah 44:8 — “You are My witnesses! Is there a God besides Me?”

5. Other Relational Titles

• Kingdom of Priests & Holy Nation — Exodus 19:5-6
• Treasured Possession — Exodus 19:5, Deuteronomy 7:6, 14:2, 26:18
• Light to the Nations — Isaiah 42:6, 49:6
• Portion / Inheritance — Deuteronomy 32:9

Summary

The Tanakh consistently portrays Israel in an intimate, covenantal relationship with Hashem:

• Son / Child — ~15+ references
• Bride / Wife — ~20+ references (especially in the Prophets)
• Servant — ~30+ references (especially in Isaiah)
• Witness — Multiple strong declarations

This is not occasional language. It is the dominant relational framework of the Hebrew Bible. Israel is not replaced or superseded — she is the servant, the witness, the beloved child and bride through whom the nations are to be blessed (Genesis 12:3).

This directly contradicts the Christian claim that the “true Israel” is now the Church. The original blueprint preserved in the Tanakh is clear: Israel remains Hashem’s chosen servant.

Hazan Gavriel ben David

The Three Days

I would like to examine the claim written in a book and taught in the highest Colleges and Seminaries. Here is their evidence:

Milestone 18: God Reveals the Tree which after Three Days Can Make Our Bitter Waters Sweet “Then Moses led Israel … and they went three days in the wilderness and found no water. When they came to Marah, they could not drink the waters of Marah, for they were bitter; therefore it was named Marah (bitter).

So the people grumbled at Moses, saying, “What shall we drink?” Then he cried out to the Lord and he pointed out to him a tree; and he threw it into the waters, and the waters became sweet.” (Exod 15:22–25 NASB) The Creator God first brought forth the trees out of the earth on the third day. What wisdom he showed to create nature to teach us about grace! The trees become the emblems of our destiny (Matt 7:17): Adam’s tree becomes the tree of death (Gen 2:17); Christ’s tree becomes the tree of life (Rev 2:7).

The account of Israel at Marah’s waters of bitterness is full of the gospel. The people had been “baptized unto Moses” at the Red Sea according to Paul (1 Cor 10:2). “Baptism,” as we have discussed, is an emblem of death. After the deliverance at the Red Sea the people went through the wilderness and suffered a great thirst for three days (Exod 15:22). When they came to Marah, they found water, but it was bitter, and so they cried out against Moses.

Moses then cried out to God, and the Lord showed him a tree. When Moses threw the tree into the bitter waters, they were made sweet (Exod 15:25). So on the third day after Israel’s emblematic death they were delivered from their thirst by the Lord’s tree. Who is unable to foresee in Marah’s tree another tree where the Lord himself would know the bitterness of the cup of gall (Matt 27:34) and would cry out, “I thirst” (John 19:28)?

Yet after three days our Lord came forth from the earth to make all our bitter waters become sweet, for he is our Fountain of Living Waters, and his Tree of Death becomes our Tree of Life. Symbol: The Cross as the Tree of Suffering Bearing Glorious Fruit The trees in the Bible are often made symbols of Christ, particularly of the “Branch” which, when grafted into the cross, becomes the tree of cursing and yet on the third day comes forth from the earth as the tree of blessing.

Is it not evident that the Creator made the trees to teach us about the possibility of grace? The Savior himself taught that there were two kinds of tree: those bearing good fruit and those bearing evil fruit. By such an example he teaches us about the two destinies of life and death. And yet there are other symbols of salvation found in the nature of trees. What was the design of the Creator, for example, in bringing forth the myrrh tree from the earth?

The trunk of this tree, which is deeply wounded by the harvester’s knife, causes its resin to bleed beads which are called “tears” and trace the gashes made in its bark. Those resinous tears, when dried and gathered and crushed and mixed with oil, yield a magnificent fragrance to delight and refresh the heart of man. Similarly the maple tree pours forth abundant sweetness from its own piercing.

What fragrance and what sweetness come forth from the wounding of these trees! God brings forth the olive tree from the ground, the tree that when beaten yields its fruit (Deut 24:20). This fruit is then gathered up and crushed under the press to yield the precious oil that shares its light and warmth and becomes a balm to heal our wounds. Only the Redeemer-God could have conceived of a tree of healing to bring forth by such suffering so beautiful a light to the world!

In a great mystery of redemption God brings out of the earth the trees bearing bad fruit as well (Matt 7:17), all to teach us that the tree of blessing (Psa 1:3) is planted alongside the tree of cursing (Deut 21:23), just like he planted the tree of knowledge in the midst of Eden alongside the tree of life (Gen 2:9). All of this was to anticipate the tree he would one day plant on the hill called Golgotha.

This greatest of all trees was to become the tree of cursing for the Redeemer in order that it might become the tree of blessing for us. Jesus would partake of the tree of death (Gal 3:13) that we might partake of the tree of life (Rev 22:2). His tree of wounding was to bring forth a fragrant sacrifice full of sweetness and light once he, like the trees, had come forth from the earth on the third day.

Gage, W. A. (2011). Milestones to Emmaus: The Third Day Resurrection in the Old Testament (pp. 48–49). Warren A. Gage.

Warren Gage transitions in this section to “third day theophanies” — moments when God manifests in great power on the third day. He builds on previous milestones to argue that the third day is the climactic day when God acts decisively. Ultimately, this is fulfilled in Christ’s resurrection.

Response:

The Claim Being Examined

Gage asserts that the recurring “third day” pattern across the Tanakh (deliverance, decision, theophany) culminates in the resurrection of Jesus as the ultimate display of God’s power. In other words, this is the day God “comes in great power” to vindicate His Son. Furthermore, it is the day He offers life to the world.

This fits the larger Christian premise: “Jesus is on every page of the Hebrew Bible.”

Applying the Method from Adam, the Blueprint of Creation, and the Tree of Life

We begin where the Torah itself demands — with Rabbi David Fohrman’s questions from A Book Like No Other (Eden Part 1 & 2):

1. Why two special trees when God only forbids one?
2. Why command Adam to eat from all the trees (including the Tree of Life), then suddenly guard the Tree of Life?
3. Why does Eve identify the wrong tree as forbidden?

These anomalies show the blueprint was never broken. The path to the Tree of Life (Torah itself — Proverbs 3:18) was never lost. Humanity was created fundamentally good (99% good). Repair is always possible through teshuvah.

How did we get from these Garden questions to the claim that every “third day” event points to Jesus’ resurrection?

Dr. Robert Carter’s Four Questions Applied to the Claim

1. How did the claim arise? The claim arises by selecting numerical coincidences (“third day”) across unrelated narratives (Joseph, Exodus, Hosea, etc.). Scholars then read them through the lens of Luke 24 and 1 Corinthians 15. This assumes a unified “third day doctrine” that the original Hebrew text does not present.

2. What does the full picture actually show? In the Tanakh, “third day” is a common Hebrew idiom for a short period of time. It signifies travel, waiting, battle preparation, or decisive action. It is not a unified resurrection code. The theophanies (God appearing in power) on or around the third day are moments of judgment, deliverance, or covenant confirmation for Israel. However, these are not hidden predictions of a dying-and-rising individual Messiah.

3. Was there enough time and continuity for this interpretation? The typological reading developed centuries after the events, primarily in the New Testament and early Church Fathers. The Jewish people, who preserved the Hebrew text for over 3,300 years, never read these passages as pointing to a divine Son dying for original sin. Moreover, they never saw the Messiah rising on the third day.

4. Does the reading match the original blueprint? No. The Torah teaches that humanity was created in the image of Hashem according to a precise design. Nathaniel Jeanson’s work on population genetics and lineage tracing (Answers in Genesis) shows distinct family lines preserved from Noah’s sons — consistent with the Torah’s blueprint. Additionally, the Jewish people exhibit both textual and genetic continuity (as evidenced by the Kohanim marker and Abrahamic DNA). The Christian claim requires rewriting the problem (from choice/covenant to inherited total depravity). It also requires rewriting the solution (from returning to the Tree of Life to a one-time blood sacrifice).

The Parallel with Islam (Jay Smith Method)

Dr. Jay Smith’s rigorous analysis shows that Islam was created around a man (Muhammad), a book (the Quran), and a land (Mecca/Medina) that do not align with the earliest historical and archaeological evidence. Christianity followed a similar pattern: it took the Hebrew blueprint and created a new narrative with a man (Jesus), a new covenant document, and a spiritual “land” (the Church replacing Israel). In the end, both systems ultimately position themselves as the fulfillment or replacement of the original Torah blueprint.

The Original Blueprint

Adam was created in the image of Hashem according to a precise design that traces throughout the Torah. The Hebrew language and structure function as both code and chemistry. Israel and the Land of Israel are not inventions — they are part of that original design. Every other religious system that claims to supersede the Torah is, at root, humanity attempting to be God.

The world is one giant family. Our assignment is to fix our family through the Torah and the Ten Commandments. As Rabbi David Fohrman shows in his Shavuot series Chosen, the Ten Sayings are fundamentally about repairing family brokenness. For example, see especially his teaching on Genesis 27 — Isaac, Rebecca, Esau, and Jacob.

Verdict on Milestone 18

The “third day theophanies” in the Tanakh are moments when God acts powerfully in history for Israel — judgment, deliverance, covenant confirmation. Gage turns them into hidden predictions of Jesus’ resurrection. However, the raw Hebrew text and the preserved blueprint do not support this reading.

The original blueprint stands. The Tree of Life was never lost. The path of teshuvah and tzedakah u’mishpat remains open.

The silence when asked for clear, plain-text receipts from the Tanakh continues to speak.

• A Series of Lectures on Truth.
• Hashem Chose a Family: The Tree of Life Blueprint Was Given to Protect All of Humanity
• Who Rejected the Messiah? It Is Not Who You Think.
• How Can Christianity and Judaism Be “Two Sides of the Same Coin” When One Looks Nothing Like the Original Blueprint?
• The Tree Of Life: Things Are Not the Way They Should Be

Hazan Gavriel ben David

Shalom, friends.

We continue our series exploring how Christianity and Islam function as two sides of the same coin — derivative traditions that rework the original Hebrew/Torah blueprint given to Adam and clarified at Sinai. In Part 3, we applied Dr. Jay Smith’s rigorous historical-critical method to both faiths.

Today, in Part 4, we ground that analysis in Tanach prophecy, the teachings of Rabbi Tovia Singer, fresh insights from Dr. John Dominic Crossan on how Luke remade Paul for a Roman audience, and the profound perspective of anthropologist Francisco Gil-White on the pro-semitic (freedom/Torah) versus antisemitic (domination/control) ways of ordering the world.

The YouTube live stream (from History Valley, ~June 25, 2026) features Dr. John Dominic Crossan discussing his book Paul the Pharisee: A Vision Beyond the Violence of Civilization. The core thesis: Luke-Acts is not straightforward history but a carefully crafted two-volume narrative that remakes/reimagines Paul to fit Luke’s broader socio-political and theological goals.

Key points from Crossan (drawn from the transcript and related discussions):

• Luke-Acts as one unified work: Designed as a two-scroll set from the start (practical constraints of ancient scrolls + deliberate literary structure). Reading Luke or Acts in isolation misses Luke’s agenda.
• Preface signals “security” (asphaleia), not just “truth”: Luke promises an “orderly account” for “security/safety” regarding what Theophilus has been taught. Crossan sees this as socio-political reassurance: It’s safe to be a Christian in the Roman Empire. Luke portrays Romans favorably and shifts the tension toward Jewish opposition.
• Luke remakes Paul: Acts presents a smoothed-out, more “Roman-friendly” Paul that diverges from the raw, contentious Paul of the authentic letters (e.g., apostleship, conflicts, Jewish identity). Scholars often prioritize Paul’s letters when they conflict with Acts—but still sneak Luke back in. Crossan urges focusing on what Luke is doing with Paul as a character in his story.
• Broader context: This aligns with Crossan’s emphasis on Paul as a Pharisee with a vision opposed to the “normal violence” of civilization, in contrast to Luke’s narrative adjustments.
• Derivative Reworking of the Blueprint: I highlight how Christianity and Islam adapt (and sometimes sideline) the original Torah/Tree of Life framework. Crossan shows Luke reworking Paul—turning a complex, Pharisee-rooted Jewish apostle into a figure that serves Luke’s vision of a safe, orderly faith within the Empire. This is classic “two sides of the same coin”: both traditions reshape the source material.

The Tanach does not treat these later religions as random developments. It frames their ancestral lines — Ishmael (associated with Arab and Islamic peoples) and Edom/Esau (rabbinically identified with Rome and broader Christendom/Western imperial patterns) — as recurring spiritual and historical forces that test Israel’s faithfulness at the end of days.

Rome Is The Head of the Empires: The British

Map illustrating the Psalm 83 confederacy, including Edom and the Ishmaelites — a prophetic prototype of end-time opposition to Israel.

Tanach Prophecy: Ishmael and Edom as End-Time Patterns

The Hebrew Scriptures contain a consistent thread: the descendants and spiritual heirs of Ishmael and Esau/Edom appear as adversaries or confederates against Israel, especially as history moves toward redemption.

• Psalm 83 describes a coalition that includes “the tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites,” along with other nations, forming a pact against God’s people and inheritance. Many readers see this as a template for later end-time alliances.
• Obadiah delivers a searing oracle against Edom for violence toward “his brother Jacob,” standing aloof while enemies attacked, and prideful betrayal. The judgment is framed as ultimately eschatological.
• Daniel’s visions of successive kingdoms culminate in a fourth power, often traditionally linked to Rome/Edom (with “iron and clay” elements sometimes associated with later mixtures or alliances).
• Rabbinic literature and the Zohar describe Ishmael and Edom alternately or jointly oppressing Israel before the final redemption. The current exile is frequently called the “exile of Edom,” with Ishmael playing a parallel or complementary role in the final stages.

These are not mere ancient grudges. They form a prophetic map. The family dynamics that began with Abraham’s sons and Isaac’s twins replay on the world stage, testing who remains faithful to the original covenant and who seeks to supplant or control it.

Tovia Singer on the End of Days: Connecting the Dots

Rabbi Tovia Singer, in videos such as “How Is Christianity Connected to Ishmael and Esau?” and “Edom is Rome and Christendom,” makes these connections explicit and accessible. He traces Christianity’s historical and theological links to Edom/Rome patterns while locating Islam within the Ishmaelite line. Singer reads current events — wars, shifting alliances, attitudes toward Israel and the Jewish people — against this ancient biblical backdrop.

He emphasizes both the reality of conflict rooted in these ancestral lines and the possibility of ultimate recognition or reconciliation under divine sovereignty. The drama is not random antisemitism; it is a spiritual contest centered on the Land, the Torah, and who carries (or distorts) the covenantal light. His End of Days discussions highlight how these prophecies continue to unfold and why clarity about origins matters.

Jay Smith’s Method: The Man, the Book, and the Land — Strengthening the Case for Roman Influence

Dr. Jay Smith’s approach demands early, independent, contemporary evidence for claims about the central figure (“the man”), the scripture (“the book”), and the geographical/historical setting (“the land” or place). When we apply this consistently:

To Islam (as Smith demonstrates): The traditional 7th-century narrative of Muhammad in Mecca shows significant evidential gaps. The Quran exhibits later layers of compilation, anachronisms, and substantial borrowing from earlier Syriac Christian and Jewish sources (including embedded Aramaic hymns). Archaeology for a major 7th-century Meccan center is weaker than the narrative requires. A French revisionist school and German scholarship further illuminate Jewish-Christian influences in the Quran’s formation.

To Christianity (extending the same method):

• The Man: The historical Jesus operated in a Jewish context, yet the later theological construct — especially the portrayal of Paul — diverges. In the recent History Valley livestream, Dr. John Dominic Crossan shows how Luke systematically remakes Paul in Acts to serve a broader agenda: smoothing conflicts, emphasizing Roman order and safety, and presenting Christianity as compatible with (or non-threatening to) imperial authority. Paul’s authentic letters reveal a more raw, Pharisaic, Torah-engaged figure; Luke’s two-volume work reshapes him.
• The Book: The Gospels and Acts were composed decades after the events, with clear redactional layers and adaptation to Greco-Roman audiences. Early contemporary corroboration for the full canonical portrait is limited.
• The Land/Place (Roman imperial context): After the 70 CE destruction of the Second Temple and the suppression of Jewish revolts, a version of the messianic movement emerges that spiritualizes the Kingdom of God, discourages political resistance, and promotes themes of order and loyalty. This functional shift helped stabilize the empire by redirecting messianic energy into an otherworldly, individual-focused faith less likely to fuel further Jewish national uprising.

Dr. John Dominic Crossan – The Rewriting of The Blueprint

---

Because you can’t put Luke back in the the 80s and Acts in the 110s, 120s. Luke Acts was composed at the beginning of the second century. And by then, Rome had its own quite correct, by the way, story about who these weirdos Christians are.

They had at the end of the first century they had the summary in Josephus and good old Tacitus at the beginning of the second century said okay you want to know who Christians are over there in Judea there was a guy called Jesus or the Christ and we crucified him because he started the movement and sort of dog gone it that didn’t work it didn’t stop the movement so it spread everywhere

and Josephus said because those who were loyal to him in the beginning stayed loyal and Tacitus says well it was a disease and diseases spread everywhere but at the beginning of the first century if you were an educated Roman and you were thinking about this thing called Christianity or you were a godfearer or a god worshipper and you know you maybe have one foot in Rome and foot in Christianity and you’re thinking this is kind of a dangerous thing. I I’m the follower of a crucified leader.

I mean, all Rome have has to say to me is you’re a follower of a crucified guy. We don’t know what you’re up to, but just for safety, we think we’ll crucify you, too. So, I think the function then of Luke Acts is to write a gospel.

He he he knows the other he knows a lot of material. He really has good sources. There is absolutely no problem with his sources. It’s his interpretation that’s the problem. He He could even have read

all of Paul’s letters. I don’t know that for sure, but it wouldn’t make any difference because he’s tailoring Paul tailoring Paul for a pro- Roman audience.

So you were saying that Acts is Luke and Acts is tailoring Paul for a Roman audience.

Luke and Acts 2nd Century Scroll

In the recent History Valley livestream with Dr. John Dominic Crossan, we see a clear example of how scribes and early Christian authors rewrote history to serve theological and socio-political ends. Crossan demonstrates that Luke-Acts is not straightforward history but a deliberately crafted two-volume narrative designed as one unified work.

Luke remakes the Apostle Paul — smoothing out conflicts from the authentic letters, downplaying tensions with the Jerusalem leadership, and portraying a more Roman-friendly version of the early movement. The preface’s emphasis on “security” (asphaleia) rather than unvarnished truth signals Luke’s goal: to reassure readers (such as Theophilus) that it is safe to be a Christian within the Roman Empire.

Shifting the Blame -The Jews

By shifting blame toward Jewish opposition while depicting Romans as relatively receptive or neutral, Luke presents a narrative that helps integrate the faith into imperial structures. This is classic scribal rewriting — not outright fabrication from nothing, but selective shaping, redaction, and adaptation of sources to fit a new context after the destruction of the Temple and amid the need for stability.

When held to rigorous standards like Dr. Jay Smith’s historical-critical method, this reveals the same pattern seen in other derivative traditions: later layers reshape the original to serve the needs of the emerging system, further illustrating how Christianity and Islam function as “two sides of the same coin” diverging from the unchanging Torah blueprint.

en.wikipedia.org

Siege of Jerusalem (70 CE) – Wikipedia

The destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE by Roman forces was a pivotal moment after which new religious narratives took shape in an imperial context.

This does not deny the sincerity of millions of Christians or the ethical fruits found in Christian lives. It does, however, reveal structural fingerprints of Roman-era adaptation. When held to the same historical-critical standard Smith applies to Islam, Christianity shows parallel patterns of later development and reworking of earlier Hebrew material. Both traditions become “two sides of the same coin” — systems that often sideline or redefine the original keepers of the code while claiming continuity or supersession.

Gil White’s Insight: Pro-Semitic (Freedom) vs. Antisemitic (Domination) Paradigms

Anthropologist Francisco Gil-White (Mexican-born, deeply engaged with Israel and Jewish history) offers a clarifying lens. Antisemitism, in his analysis, is frequently not mere prejudice but ideological opposition to the Jewish contribution of freedom — the Torah’s revelation of one God, moral law, human dignity, and covenantal responsibility that resists tyranny and arbitrary power. Moses and Sinai planted seeds of liberty under law that authoritarian systems throughout history have sought to uproot or co-opt.

• The pro-semitic way (aligned with Israel’s role) upholds the original Blueprint: Torah as Tree of Life, chosenness as light and responsibility, actions (“receipts”) over narrative control, and family/DNA legacy as priestly witness. This fosters genuine human flourishing and resistance to total domination.
• The antisemitic way prioritizes domination and control — whether imperial (Rome/Edom-style) or expansionist/jihadist. These systems often co-opt, redefine, or attack the source tradition to consolidate power.

Christianity’s Roman-shaped elements and certain developments within Islamic history can function within or enable such dynamics by presenting alternative “final” narratives that diminish Israel’s unique covenantal position. Defending Israel and the Jewish people, therefore, defends foundational values of freedom against authoritarian models. Gil-White’s work helps us see the larger contest of paradigms behind the religious and geopolitical surface.

Returning to the Original Tree of Life Blueprint

The Tanach, supported by archaeology, DNA studies tracing priestly and broader lineages, gematria, chiastic structures, and unfolding prophecy, consistently points back to one eternal source: the Tree of Life given to Adam, clarified at Sinai, and preserved by Israel as a light to the nations.

Ishmael and Edom/Rome appear in prophecy not as random historical accidents but as part of the drama that tests faithfulness to that original code. The “two sides of the same coin” ultimately point to the urgent need for Jews to return to deeper Torah observance and for all peoples to align with the unchanging revelation rather than later rewrites.

Signs of this return are visible: the ingathering of hidden Jews (crypto-Jewish lines awakening through DNA and family stories), growing interest in authentic Hebrew sources, and the exposure of historical layers through rigorous scholarship. As I emphasize in my book, Adam, the Blueprint of Creation and the Tree of Life and the Star of Jacob prophecy series, words create worlds, actions matter more than claims, and we are one extended family from three fathers with a shared path home.

Practical Steps and Resources

• Study the sources: Watch Tovia Singer’s teachings on Edom/Rome and Ishmael (search his channel for the titles linked above). Review Dr. Jay Smith’s historical-critical presentations and the Crossan discussion on Luke-Acts.
• Return to the Blueprint: Download the free first chapter of Adam, the Blueprint of Creation, and the Tree of Life at beithashoavah.org. Explore our weekly Torah study guides and Parsha teachings.
• Support the mission: Our POD T-shirts (GenesisFrequency on Etsy) and website resources help sustain full-time Torah teaching, prison chaplaincy, and content creation as I transition toward retirement from hospital work.
• Engage the prophecy: Follow unfolding events through the lens of Tanach rather than media narratives alone. The Tree of Life is not abstract — it is the living code for redemption.

The pattern is clear. The invitation is open. The original Blueprint still stands.

May we all merit to see the full revelation of the Tree of Life in our days, with Israel secure in her Land and all nations blessed through the eternal covenant.

Hazan Gavriel ben David Esnoga Beit HaShoavah | Amarillo, Texas beithashoavah.org

• A Jewish Perspective on the Spiritual War and Hashem’s End from the Beginning
• How Can Christianity and Judaism Be “Two Sides of the Same Coin” When One Looks Nothing Like the Original Blueprint?
• Two Sides of the Same Coin – Part 3: The French Revisionist School and the Christian Roots of the Quran
• The Two Messiahs and World War III: A Jewish Perspective on Christianity, Islam, and Biblical Prophecy
• Two Sides Of The Same Coin: Christianity and Islam (Part 2)

This Shabbat (12 Tammuz 5786 / June 27, 2026), Jews around the world read the powerful double Torah portion Parshat Chukat-Balak (Numbers 19:1–25:9). At the same moment, timely teachings from Rabbi Tovia Singer and Rabbi Matityahu Glazerson illuminate exactly what the Tanakh says about the events unfolding in our world.

From physical and spiritual enemies to Shabbat as divine protection, from purification after loss to prophetic blessings that cannot be cursed — the Torah is not ancient history. It is a living blueprint speaking directly to October 7th, ongoing conflicts, the ingathering of exiles, and the path to redemption.

As Hazan Gavriel ben David, leading a small synagogue in Amarillo, Texas, teaching Torah in prison, and writing on family history and prophecy, these messages resonate deeply. Let’s explore them together.

Rabbi Tovia Singer: The Tanakh as Our Lens for Current Events

In his recent podcast interview, Rabbi Tovia Singer — a leading voice in Jewish outreach and counter-missionary work — emphasizes that the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) provides the clearest framework for understanding our historic moment.

Singer discusses how October 7th clarified many things: the reality of existential threats, the ingathering of exiles (Aliyah), and the unfolding of prophecy. He points to passages such as Zechariah 12, where Jerusalem becomes a “burdensome stone” for the nations, and notes that Jews will return to the Land before the complete peace of Mashiach. Wars continue, yet divine protection endures. He also highlights the detailed vision of the Third Temple in Ezekiel chapters 40–48.

The core message? Return to the plain meaning of the Tanakh. Study it deeply, free from later interpretations that distort its plain sense (peshat). This call aligns with the urgent need for authentic Torah education in our generation.

Parshat Chukat: Purification, Loss, and Leadership in Crisis

Chukat opens with the mysterious statute of the Red Heifer (Parah Adumah). Its ashes purify those contaminated by contact with death (Numbers 19). Shortly after, Miriam dies; the people complain about water; Moses strikes the rock instead of speaking to it (resulting in his punishment); and Aaron passes away. Victories follow over Sihon and Og, followed by the bronze serpent (Nehushtan) that heals snakebites when the people look toward it.

These stories speak to our time. After immense loss — whether personal tragedies or the national mourning since October 7th — the Torah provides a path to purification and renewal. The red heifer reminds us that even in the shadow of death, holiness and life can be restored. Modern interest in red heifers for potential Temple use echoes this ancient statute.

Moses’ error at the rock teaches accountability in leadership and the power of speech. In an era of rapid news and emotional reactions, the lesson is clear: trust God’s precise instructions rather than reacting from frustration.

The bronze serpent offers profound hope: healing comes when we turn our gaze to Hashem’s provision amid affliction.

Parshat Balak: Bilam, Balak, and Enemies Turned to Blessings

In Balak, the Moabite king Balak fears the Israelites after their victories. He hires the renowned prophet-for-hire Bilam (Balaam) to curse them. Yet Hashem intervenes dramatically: Bilam’s donkey speaks, an angel blocks the path, and Bilam is forced to bless Israel instead of cursing them.

Rabbi Matityahu Glazerson’s lecture on Balak and Bilam clarifies the archetypes. Balak represents physical threats — military or political attempts to destroy Israel. Bilam embodies spiritual warfare — curses, sorcery, and efforts to darken the light of Torah or separate the Jewish people from their Source.

We see these patterns today. Physical enemies (rockets, terror proxies) combine with spiritual attacks (antisemitism masked as criticism, missionary efforts, cultural assimilation). Yet, just as in the Parsha, what is meant for evil becomes blessing: Israel’s resilience, technological advances, global attention on Jewish survival, and the strengthening of faith.

Bilam’s oracles contain some of the most beautiful prophecies in the Tanakh, including the iconic “How goodly are your tents, O Jacob” (Numbers 24:5) and the messianic “A star shall come out of Jacob, and a scepter shall rise out of Israel” (24:17). This “Star of Jacob” is central to prophetic hope and ties directly into ongoing redemption processes.

Shabbat Observance as Protection for Israel: Torah Codes & October 7 Miracles

In another powerful teaching, Rabbi Glazerson explores how Shabbat observance protects and saves Israel, supported by Torah codes (equidistant letter sequences) and gematria.

He highlights statistical and mathematical patterns linking Shabbat to salvation. Post-October 7 accounts are especially moving: communities or families who kept Shabbat — closing gates, staying home for the holy day — experienced miracles. Individuals who strengthened their Shabbat observance reported divine protection.

This echoes the Sages and Midrash: by the merit of Shabbat, Israel is guarded. Historically, those who kept Shabbat endured as a people; those who abandoned it often assimilated within a few generations. Shabbat fosters family unity, communal prayer, rest, and holiness — the practical “receipts” that sustain Jewish life.

Glazerson connects this to broader messianic themes, including sparks of redemption visible even in unlikely leaders who support Israel.

Connecting the Dots: The Tanakh Blueprint for Our Generation

Parshat Chukat-Balak, read alongside these teachings, reveals recurring divine patterns:

• Impurity and Loss (Chukat) → Path to purification and healing.
• Enemy Plots (Balak) → Reversed into blessings and prophecy.
• Spiritual Safeguard (Shabbat) → Protects against both physical and spiritual threats.

The Tanakh is not silent on today’s events. It provides the map: return to Torah, observe mitzvot (especially Shabbat), study deeply, and trust in the ultimate redemption. As one who integrates Torah with archaeology, DNA evidence of our priestly and crypto-Jewish heritage, and the Tree of Life blueprint, I see these as confirmation of the same unified system.

My own work — the book Adam, the Blueprint of Creation and the Tree of Life; the “Star of Jacob” prophecy series; family history writings as Hazan Gavriel ben David; and GenesisFrequency Torah-inspired designs — flows from this understanding. The patterns are clear for those with eyes to see.

Practical Steps: Turning Tanakh Wisdom into Action

1. Study This Week’s Parsha — Read Numbers 19–25. Use Sefaria for Hebrew/English with commentaries.
2. Watch the Teachings — Rabbi Tovia Singer’s interview, Rabbi Glazerson on Balak/Bilam, and on Shabbat protection.
3. Strengthen Shabbat — Make it a day of rest, family, prayer, and joy. Its protective power is real.
4. Deepen Learning — Visit beithashoavah.org for study guides, PDFs, and mentorship opportunities.
5. Support Torah Life — Engage with prison ministry, small synagogues, and creative outreach. Wear or share reminders like Tree of Life or Psalm designs from GenesisFrequency.
6. Live the “Receipts” — Actions of observance, study, and kindness matter more than words.

Conclusion: Hope in the Pattern of Redemption

The Tanakh does not promise an easy path, but it guarantees that curses turn to blessings, death gives way to life, and Shabbat anchors us in holiness. We are living in the time of ingathering and awakening. The Star of Jacob is rising.

May we merit to see the full redemption, the rebuilding of the Temple, and peace for Israel and the world. Shabbat Shalom.

Hazan Gevriel ben David

What resonated most with you from this Parsha or the teachings? Share in the comments. Subscribe for more Torah insights, prophecy discussions, and practical guidance. Explore resources at beithashoavah.org and support the work through study, sharing, or GenesisFrequency.

Links:

• Rabbi Tovia Singer Podcast
• Rabbi Glazerson – Balak/Bilam
• Rabbi Glazerson – Shabbat Protection
• Sefaria: Parshat Chukat-Balak
• My Book & Prophecy Series

• Parashat Balak: Yeshua The Angel of the LORD
• Chapter Nine: Codes That Don’t Lie – Glazerson’s Torah Oracle
• Chapter Six: Urim and Thummim – Our Codes Speak, Yours Don’t
• From Messianic Jew to Ally: My 21-Year Journey with Tovia Singer and Tamar Yonah
• From Counter-Missionary to Ally: My 21-Year Journey with Tovia Singer and Tamar Yonah

In the Torah’s majestic blueprint of creation—where Adam stands as the archetypal vessel and the Tree of Life maps the emotional, psychological, and anatomical architecture of the soul—silence is not emptiness. It is the sacred fire that forges the kli, the holy vessel capable of receiving and transmitting divine light.

The 38 years of narrative silence in Parashat Chukat, the shared theodicy question of Moses and David, the inner battle illuminated by Pirkei Avot, the prophetic unfolding of Gog and Magog, and America’s own covenantal origins all converge on one transformative truth:

Every great soul and every great nation must pass through the midbar (wilderness) to be refined into a vessel of worship. Only then can we emerge, like the new generation at the waters of Meribah, digging our own wells and singing our own song.

As America approaches its 250th anniversary in 2026, the nation stands at a Deuteronomy moment. The choice before us is the same one placed before Israel at Moab: life and blessing through obedience to the covenant, or the consequences of departure from the divine blueprint.

The United States was not founded in a vacuum of secular invention. Its laws, governmental structure, vows, and oaths to God echo the Torah’s framework for a people bound to the Creator. Yet in our day, many—including prominent voices in media and podcasts—analyze history and current events through rewritten codes that obscure the original Hebrew source.

The Torah, the Tree of Life to those who hold fast to her, remains the unaltered operating system. Returning to it—blessing Israel, upholding the Jewish people as God’s eternal bride, and recognizing the Jewish Bible as the foundation—is the only path that leads to true national blessing and the creation of vessels worthy of divine service.

The Torah Blueprint and the Inner Wilderness

Torah presents itself as the master blueprint of existence. Just as the physical body has form and function, the soul possesses emotional and psychological layers structured by the Tree of Life. Words create worlds, yet silence shapes the vessel that can receive and reveal them. Pirkei Avot serves as the practical manual for this inner refinement: “Who is wise? One who learns from every person.” “Make a fence around the Torah.” Control of speech, desire, and ego—the very impulses that doomed the desert generation—become the disciplines that carve the kli.

The 38 years of silence following the spies’ and Korach’s rebellions (Numbers 13–19, into chapter 20) illustrate the process with divine precision. The first generation’s dramatic sins and complaints filled the early narrative with rebellion at every turn. Then, the Torah falls nearly silent. No major prophecies, upheavals, or miracles are recorded in detail.

The Sages teach this was a period of divine distance and arrested development—a holding pattern in which the rebellious generation died out while the next was forged. What appeared as narrative absence was actually the hidden work of refinement. The midbar stripped away noise so the soul could be reshaped. As Rabbi Chaim Richman teaches in his Chukat shiur, the silence itself testifies: “There’s nothing to see here.” The upheavals of the first two years had done their work; now came the quiet forging of a new people.

All great people require this wilderness experience. Moses spent forty years in Midian before the burning bush. David tended sheep in silent fields, then hid in caves and deserts while fleeing Saul. These were not wasted years—they were the kiln in which the vessel was formed.

Parashat Chukat This Is Our Song

In Parashat Chukat, the turning point arrives. After 38 years of quiet, the old leadership passes—Miriam dies, and her miraculous well dries up; Aaron’s death is decreed. The new generation must now actively dig for water. They do not wait passively; they excavate. Then they sing: “Then Israel sang this song…”

(Numbers 21). Unlike the Song at the Sea led by Moses, this is their own song—proactive, mature worship. Rabbi Richman highlights this shift: the new generation seeks God’s presence in an unprecedented, proactive way. The silence prepared them. The hidden years refined the vessel. Now the kli can hold living water and pour it out in song. This is the model for our time.

Moses and David: The Question of Justice and the Refining Power of Silence

Moses voiced the same question that echoes through the ages and through our own hearts: “Master of the Universe, why do the righteous prosper, the righteous suffer, the wicked prosper, and the wicked suffer?” In Talmud Berachot 7a, this plea is expanded into a profound aggadic dialogue. God categorizes four types and reveals that justice is not always visible in this world.

The completely righteous receive reward here; the righteous with some sin suffer to atone and merit greater reward later. The wicked with some merit prosper here and receive full punishment later. The completely wicked suffer here. Full understanding belongs to the World to Come. Moses is shown aspects of divine providence, yet even he cannot fully grasp the “ways” of God in this lifetime.

A traditional Midrashic teaching, in the spirit of Berachot 7a and later aggadah on gilgul, gives a vivid illustration. Moses sees a scene of apparent injustice: a man on a horse watches as another man is robbed and killed. Distressed, Moses is shown the continuation. Earlier, a young man and his father were robbed; the father was killed. The surviving son grows up to become a robber and killer. What looked like random evil was precise rectification across lives or generations. The “wicked” man was settling an old account; the victim’s soul was balancing a prior wrong. Apparent silence or injustice hides the perfect accounting of divine justice.

The Psalms of Silence By David

David lived this truth in the wilderness. As shepherd, fugitive, and king-in-waiting, he endured long seasons of silence. In caves and wilderness strongholds, he composed psalms that wrestle honestly with the prosperity of the wicked and the suffering of the righteous, yet conclude in the sanctuary of God that their end is destruction while the upright inherit the land. The inner battle—the greatest battle—is fought and won in these silent places. Pirkei Avot trains us for exactly this: the disciplines of character refinement turn suffering into service and questions into vessels of deeper faith.

America’s Covenant Foundations: Deuteronomy’s Blueprint in the New World

The parallels between Deuteronomy and America’s founding documents are neither coincidental nor superficial. Deuteronomy presents a national covenant: blessings for obedience to God’s law and curses for departure; a structure of accountable leadership; vows and oaths taken before the Creator; and a call to remember the wilderness journey so that future generations do not forget.

The Mayflower Compact of 1620 established self-government “for the glory of God and advancement of the Christian faith”—a covenantal document in the spirit of Deuteronomy. William Bradford, the key leader and longtime governor of Plymouth Colony, devoted significant portions of his later Biblical studies to Hebrew so he could read the Scriptures in their original tongue. His journal, Of Plimoth Plantation, records the Pilgrims’ trials with deep reliance on the Hebrew Bible.

Accounts in his writings highlight principled stands on justice, including dealings with captives and a rejection of exploitative enslavement practices—reflecting a Biblical ethic of returning the oppressed and holding wrongdoers accountable. Bradford understood that true freedom flows from alignment with the Creator’s ways.

The Signers of The Declaration of Independence

The signers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution carried this covenantal mindset forward. The 56 signers of the Declaration pledged their “lives, fortunes, and sacred honor.” These were not abstract words. Many faced real peril: property seized, families threatened, fortunes lost. John Hancock’s bold signature symbolized defiance; as president of the Continental Congress, he risked everything. Benjamin Rush, physician and signer, drew from Biblical ethics in advocating for the poor and against slavery.

John Witherspoon, the only clergyman signer, was a Presbyterian minister whose sermons framed the Revolution in covenantal and Biblical terms. Others, like Robert Morris (key financier) and Charles Carroll (the only Catholic signer, risking unique persecution), demonstrated faith-driven sacrifice.

Their stories, preserved in original sources and highlighted through David Barton and Tim Barton’s work at WallBuilders, reveal men who believed government must rest on “the laws of nature and of nature’s God.” They studied Scripture, prayed, and acted with the conviction that America’s success depended on alignment with divine order. Without their willingness to risk all, the nation might never have formed.

The Unknown Jewish Heroes In America

Unknown Jewish patriots were equally indispensable. Haym Salomon, a Polish-born Sephardic Jew, became one of the Revolution’s greatest financiers. He converted foreign loans into hard currency, personally advanced vast sums, and used his linguistic skills as a broker to keep the Continental Army funded when the treasury was empty.

Twice arrested by the British, he encouraged desertions and supported the Patriot cause at great personal cost. Without his financial genius and courage, the Revolution might have collapsed before Yorktown. Other figures—Francis Salvador (first Jewish casualty, fighting for independence), Mordecai Sheftall (commissary general supplying troops), and earlier Jewish settlers who brought skills in trade and community-building—sustained the colonies economically and militarily. These contributions remind us that America’s story includes Jewish hands from the very beginning.

Historical accounts also highlight leaders in American public life whose maternal Jewish lineage conferred halachic Jewish status and who received early Jewish schooling, weaving additional threads of covenantal ethics into the nation’s leadership fabric. These hidden contributions underscore that Jewish presence and influence extended into the highest levels of governance, reinforcing the moral and spiritual foundations drawn from the Hebrew Scriptures.

Parallels Between Ancient Israel and Modern America

History rhymes with striking clarity. The Northern Kingdom of Israel fell into idolatry, syncretism, and moral decay, ignoring prophetic warnings until exile. The Southern Kingdom of Judah witnessed this, yet often failed to fully repent, repeating cycles of compromise. In modern America, analogous patterns emerge.

Segments aligned with progressive ideologies have embraced forms of modern “idolatry”—elevating self, secular humanism, or redefined morality above the Creator—much like the Northern Kingdom’s golden calves. Meanwhile, more conservative elements, such as the Southern Kingdom, have sometimes failed to fully internalize the lessons, allowing cultural drift or political expediency to erode the foundations rather than returning wholeheartedly to the original covenant.

The prophets called both kingdoms to account. Today, the same call resounds: a nation’s decisions must be rooted in the will of Hashem as revealed in the Jewish Bible—the Tanach—not in rewritten codes that remove the Creator and diminish His creation.

The Source Code Debate and Prophecy Unfolding

Many well-meaning voices—Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, George Noory, and countless podcasters—offer insightful analysis of current events. Yet they often operate primarily through the Christian Bible as their lens, a text that contains truth but reflects layers of translation, interpretation, and historical development, removed from the original Hebrew source code.

As Rabbi Tovia Singer powerfully demonstrates in his teachings on current events and prophecy, understanding unfolding history requires the Tanach in its original context. Without it, one risks missing the full picture of divine providence.

We Are Cousins

Nathaniel Jeanson’s Traced and research methods, akin to Jay Smith’s deconstruction of later traditions, reveal how alternative systems can function as “bootlegged copies” of the original Hebrew code—man-made constructs lacking the full operating integrity of Torah. Hebrew itself functions as an operating system; the first 92 words of the Torah align with the Periodic Table of Elements, as explored in Rabbi Ephraim Palvanov’s teachings on Torah and chemistry. Science and Torah are not at odds; they reveal the same blueprint.

War Of Gog And Magog

October 7, 2023, marked a seismic shift. The Hamas attack and ensuing war align for many with the beginning of the prophesied War of Gog and Magog (Ezekiel 38–39, Zechariah 12). Messiah ben Yosef dynamics—suffering and preparation preceding full redemption—have played out before our eyes. Rabbi Tovia Singer’s recent teachings connect these events to the return of the Jewish people, the centrality of Jerusalem, and the role of Persia (Iran) in the prophetic drama.

The Star Of Jacob Prophecy

The Zohar and Balaam’s prophecy in Numbers (the “Star of Jacob” and scepter from Israel) have been linked in interpretive traditions to modern signs and figures in the messianic process, including developments around Donald Trump and subsequent events near September 2024. Rabbi Mendel Kessin’s teachings on Esau (Edom/Rome/Western civilization) add profound geopolitical depth. Trump embodies aspects of the “good side of Esau”—a brother who can turn toward or against Jacob/Israel.

Recent episodes from Kessin’s Torah Thinking channel explore Trump’s actions, policy tensions around Israel, and the ongoing messianic process. Britain, as the “evil side of Esau” in certain interpretations—imperial and, historically, often opposed to Jewish restoration—fits into this tapestry of Edom’s dual legacy. The interwoven threads of U.S., British, European, and Middle Eastern politics reveal the hand of providence moving nations according to the unalterable blueprint.

The Torah Codes Rabbi Glazerson

Rabbi Matityahu Glazerson’s channel and recent teachings on Torah codes (including “Shabbat Observance as Protection for Israel in Torah Codes” and matrices with skip 424 for Messiah son of David) bring powerful, gematria-driven insight to this moment. Glazerson reveals how keeping Shabbat—the ultimate expression of silence and cessation from creative work—functions as a protective code in the Torah for the Jewish people and, by extension, for nations that align with them.

He connects current events (including shifting alliances and threats) to hidden patterns in the weekly portions, showing how observance of the original commandments creates spiritual “firewalls” against Gog and Magog forces. His analysis of Numbers, Zohar, and prophetic timelines underscores that redemption accelerates when we return to the source code rather than relying on human strategies alone. Glazerson’s updates emphasize the “third day” motif and the current era as a hidden-to-revealed transition, mirroring the 38 years of silence in Chukat.

Shabbat, as the weekly midbar, refines the vessel and invites divine protection— a message that calls America to support Israel’s security while examining its own covenantal fidelity. His codes on Messiah ben David (424) and on end-of-days signs provide mathematical confirmation of the blueprint’s precision.

Jews Are Not The Problem

Dan Bongino’s recent insights highlight growing awareness among conservative voices of deeper plans and shifts affecting Israel and U.S. policy. Bongino’s analysis of political maneuvers and their implications for alliances serves as a reminder that even perceptive commentators benefit from the original Torah lens to avoid deception and align with divine will.

Shorts like “Are Jews simply better than non-Jews?” further clarify the Torah perspective on chosenness—not superiority for domination, but responsibility as a light to the nations (Isaiah 42:6, 49:6). This chosen role calls all peoples to partner in the blueprint rather than envy or reject it.

Yanuka The Messiah

Rabbi Michael Skobac’s teaching on why some Christians view respected Israeli rabbis (such as the Yanuka) as the “Anti-Christ” exposes deeper issues of rewritten codes and replacement theology. Skobac clarifies the Torah perspective on Jewish scholarship and messianic expectations, showing how misinterpretations of the original source fuel misunderstanding. This reinforces the need for the unfiltered Tanach to accurately navigate prophecy.

Videos such as “Trump, Israel, and the Truth Nobody Wants to Admit” and discussions of the Trump-Turkey deal highlight the tightrope: strong support juxtaposed with pragmatic deals that risk isolating Israel. These are not random; they reflect Esau’s role in the end times. The call is clear: prioritize the original Hebrew code over rewritten lenses.

Rav Avigdor Miller ztl’s classic teaching on “Does God Need Us?” powerfully reinforces the theme: Hashem does not “need” our mitzvot in a deficient way, but He desires our partnership so that we become active vessels through which His presence is revealed in the world. His lesson on apples (everyday objects revealing divine providence) reminds us that the blueprint is visible in the ordinary when viewed through Torah eyes. Miller’s insight calls us to proactive worship that perfects the kli and brings redemption closer.

The Call: Creating the Vessel and the Path of Blessing

Hashem declares through the prophets that nothing our hands have made endures apart from Him. “I need you,” Hashem says to Adam, His children. Without our hands, ears, and eyes as vessels of worship, how will the world know that He is Hashem? Recent Torah portions remind us: “All that your hands have done.” We are called to be active participants in the blueprint.

The unalterable blueprint—Adam as the Blueprint of Creation and the Tree of Life—cannot be altered by any man-made system. The greatest way forward for the United States is to bless Israel. As Scripture promises, those who bless Abraham’s descendants will be blessed. America, in its covenantal origins, has a role tied to Esau’s legacy, but can choose to align with the God of Israel.

The Bible is not silent about the most powerful nation on earth; it speaks through principles applicable to every empire and republic. The signers understood this; the unknown Jewish patriots lived it; figures with halachic Jewish maternal lineage and Jewish education carried covenantal ethics into leadership.

Conclusion

In this 250th year, America faces the same choice Deuteronomy placed before Israel. Will we remember the wilderness journey, return to the original Hebrew source code, and align our decisions with Hashem’s will? Or will we continue analyzing events through rewritten lenses that obscure the Creator and His creation?

The vessel is forged in silence. The question of justice deepens trust. The prophetic signs—Gog and Magog, the Star of Jacob, the role of Edom—call us to awareness. The stories of the unknown Jewish patriots and the signers’ faith-driven sacrifice remind us that this nation was built with hands guided by the blueprint. Hashem needs us—His children, Adam—to return to the original source code our forefathers read in Hebrew.

May we all merit to emerge from our midbar seasons refined, singing, and ready—blessing Israel so that America may be blessed, and become vessels through which the world comes to know that Hashem alone is God. The blueprint cannot be altered. The choice is ours. Share your thoughts in the comments and explore more Torah insights at beithashoavah.org.

Hazan Gavriel ben David

Creating a Vessel of Worship: The Midbar of Silence, the Question of Justice, and the Song of the New Generation


The Tree Of Life: Things Are Not the Way They Should Be


Parashat Chukat 5786: The 38 Years of Silence and Singing Your Own Song


Hidden Lights Returning: America’s Unique Jewish Story — From Revolutionary Heroes to Crypto-Jews in the Southwest, and My Own Journey Home


Bible Codes Revealed at Yiboneh with Rabbi Moshe Zeldman

By Hazan Gavriel ben David Esnoga Beit HaShoavah – Amarillo, Texas

The Torah is not a static book of ancient stories. It is the living blueprint of creation — the Tree of Life itself. Every word, sentence, and verse pulses with prophetic power. As our sages teach, the Torah contains everything. Recent insights from Torah scholars and numerical alignments confirm this in ways that leave us in awe. The verses of the Torah correspond to the years of history. They speak directly to the events of our time.

This is not a coincidence. It is hashgacha pratit — divine providence — revealing that we are living in the footsteps of the Messiah (Ikvot Mashiach). These are the birth pangs foretold by the prophets.

The Secret of the Sentences: 5708 / 1948

Rabbi Benjamin Blech shares a profound teaching from a kabbalist. The sentences in the Torah align numerically with years in Jewish history. Count the verses from the beginning of the Torah. With this, remarkable patterns emerge.

The 5,708th verse falls in Deuteronomy (Devarim) 30:3:

“And the Lord your God will turn your captivity, and have compassion upon you, and will return and gather you from all the peoples where the Lord your God has scattered you.”

This is the Hebrew year 5708 — 1948 in the Gregorian calendar, the year the modern State of Israel was reborn. After 2,000 years of exile, dispersion, and the ashes of the Holocaust, the ingathering began. The foundation of Israel as a sovereign Jewish state was not a random political event. It was prophesied in the precise verse tied to that year.

This aligns with the “Joseph” phase of redemption — Mashiach ben Yosef as the material, physical preparation. It includes building the land, defending it, and gathering exiles. As Rav Kook and others taught, this is the collective, preparatory work. It comes before the fuller spiritual redemption of Mashiach ben David.

5783–5784: The Verse of Horrors and the Call to Reflection

Extend this principle to our own days. The Hebrew year 5783 (overlapping into 5784) corresponds to verses describing unimaginable violation and suffering. This includes the rape and abuse of the elderly alongside the young. Tragically, this matches the horrors reported from the Simchat Torah massacre on October 7, 2023 (5784). On that day, Hamas terrorists unleashed barbaric sexual violence as part of the attack on Israel during a joyous festival.

In the surrounding context of Deuteronomy 32, we find calls for wisdom: “If they were wise, they would understand this; they would reflect upon their fate” (Deut 32:29, in the 5784 alignment). God speaks of provocation through “non-gods” and vanities. There is jealousy born of love, curses for straying, and the urgent need to return.

October 7 was not random. It occurred in the sacred season closing Sukkot, evoking vulnerability (the sukkah) and joy turned to mourning. It fits the classical sources on Mashiach ben Yosef—the suffering-warrior phase of redemption. The Talmud (Sukkah 52a) links Zechariah 12 — nations attacking Jerusalem, mourning for the “pierced one” — to Mashiach ben Yosef, slain in battle. This is the painful preparatory stage: collective trauma, national awakening, and the call to teshuvah.

Rabbi Tovia Singer powerfully clarifies these texts. He shows that they describe a future war and mourning process, not a first-century fulfillment. Rabbi Matityahu Glazerson’s Torah codes further reveal “Seventh of October,” Gog and Magog patterns, and redemption timelines. All these align with these years.

Miracles of Precise Timing

Rabbi Uri Pilichowski reminds us that a miracle is often defined by when it happens. The splitting of the sea was miraculous because it occurred exactly when Israel needed it most. Esther’s rise, the victories of 1948 and 1967 — all timed perfectly. We are seeing this again in Israel’s recent defensive successes amid existential threats. Yet after October 7, many remain in a daze, processing trauma while missing the broader redemptive picture.

David Ben-Gurion said, “To be a realist as a Jew, you have to believe in miracles.” The re-establishment of Israel after millennia, survival against overwhelming odds, and the ingathering despite everything — these are not natural outcomes. They are the fulfillment of Deuteronomy 30:3 in real time.

What This Means for Us: Receipts and Return

My own journey — from hidden Jewish roots revealed on 9/11, through family history as Gavriel ben David, DNA confirming priestly lines, and building this small esnoga and prison ministry — echoes these patterns. The Torah speaks to our generation’s legacy: returning the hidden sparks and preserving family through trials (as with our losses and challenges). We live with “receipts” — actions over empty words. Fidelity, Torah study, love of neighbor, and building for redemption.

The alignment of verses with years calls us to action:

• Reflect and return (teshuvah) — away from vanities toward authentic Torah living.
• See the miracles amid the birth pangs.
• Strengthen unity — as one people in the face of enemies, just as Zechariah foretells. Mourning leads to the spirit of grace.
• Teach and share — in our homes, synagogues, prisons, and online.

As Glazerson’s codes and these numerical insights show, we are in the time of preparation. The suffering of the Ben Yosef phase (the event/process of October 7 and its aftermath) paves the way for fuller redemption.

The Torah Speaks Today

Brothers and sisters, the Torah is speaking now. The same divine words that foretold 1948’s foundation describe our trials in 5783–5784 and call us forward. Study these pesukim. Count the verses. See the patterns. Let them awaken us.

May we merit to see Mashiach ben David soon, with the Temple rebuilt and universal peace. May all exiles be gathered — including the hidden ones from our families. As Deuteronomy 30 promises, God will have compassion and gather us.

Let’s strengthen one another with the teachings (reciepts) of Torah life. Share this with your circles. Comment below or reach out for the study.

Hazan Gavriel ben David Beit HaShoavah – Teaching Torah, Preserving Legacy

• From Messianic Jew to Ally: My 21-Year Journey with Tovia Singer and Tamar Yonah
• From Counter-Missionary to Ally: My 21-Year Journey with Tovia Singer and Tamar Yonah
• Daniel Prophesied Jesus of Nazareth
• Vayetze | ויצא | “He went out ” Torah: Genesis 28:10-32:2
• The Torah: A Book Like No Other – October 7 Prophecy & The Tree of Life Blueprint

The BLK SHP Bible Talk Episode: They Found It in a Cave: The Isaiah Scroll

“I’m going to tell you a story that’s as frustrating as it is heartbreaking. It’s the story of how generations of faithful YHVH-worshippers came so close to seeing the Messiah yet still missed him.

They didn’t miss him because the evidence wasn’t there. It was always there. There’s a scroll sitting in a museum in Jerusalem. It was copied before Jesus of Nazareth was born. And what it says about the Messiah is something the rabbis spent a thousand years trying not to talk about. The ancient Jewish scholars knew something their own descendants were never told.

2,000 years of Jewish scholarship contain a portrait of the Messiah so specific that it names his birthplace.

It describes his death, and it fixes the century of his arrival. I’m talking about ancient Jewish writings. Some of them you may have heard of. Maybe you’ve even read some of them. The Talmud and the Midrash, the Targams, the Zohar, the sacred libraries the rabbis themselves

built. And somewhere between 1096 AD and 1,200 AD, about a thousand years ago, what that library said about the Messiah got buried. Not out of deception, I don’t think, but out of grief”.

Hazan Gavriel ben David – Response

I watched the episode “They Found It in a Cave, and It Turned Modern Judaism Upside Down.” The host presents a long list of pre-Christian Jewish sources that he claims clearly describe a suffering, dying, and rising individual Messiah who matches Jesus. He argues that the collective reading of Isaiah 53 is a later invention forced on the Jewish people by trauma and polemic.

I would like to first ask a few questions to the viewers of BLK. Do you want to know the truth, or are you just going along like everyone else in the world, following Rome’s orders?

The Christian Bible has nothing to do with the Hebrew Bible. The Bible is a Greek word; it was originally called the Tanach and was later given its name by the Greeks. In Greek, the Bible means the Tanach/Book.

A Book Like No Other Makes A Point

Rabbi David Fohrman opens his A Book Like No Other series on the Garden of Eden with several simple but devastating questions about the scene itself:

1. Why are there two special trees in the center of the Garden — the Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil — when God only mentions one in the command?
2. Why does God command Adam to eat from all the trees of the Garden (including the Tree of Life), yet after eating from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, He suddenly guards the Tree of Life as if it had never been available?
3. Why does Eve tell the snake that “the tree in the middle of the Garden” is forbidden, when Genesis 2:9 places the Tree of Life in the middle?
4. Why did Hashem not tell Adam about the Tree of Life?
5. Where is the Tree of Life?
6. Why did Hashem create something that has no use in the world?

These are not minor details. They are the Torah’s way of forcing us to look at the actual blueprint. The anomalies are the message.

Adam Did Not Know About The Tree of Life

Now ask yourself the same question the Torah forces us to ask:

How did we get from the Garden to questions about Jesus?

How did a story about two trees, a command to eat from all of them, a tempter who told the truth about consequences, and a path that was never lost become a story about inherited total depravity, a divine blood sacrifice, and a dying-and-rising individual Messiah?

This is the rewrite of the blueprint.

Isaiah 53 and Zephaniah 3: “No Iniquity in Their Mouth”

Christian teachers frequently isolate Isaiah 53:9 — “because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth” — as proof of a sinless individual Messiah. But the prophets themselves connect this language directly to the righteous remnant of Israel.

Look at Zephaniah 3:13 (in the same prophetic tradition):

“The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity, nor speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth: for they shall feed and lie down, and none shall make them afraid.”

This is the exact same phrasing as Isaiah 53:9. The servant who has “no deceit in his mouth” is the faithful remnant of Israel that emerges purified after judgment. They are the ones who will dwell securely, feeding and lying down in peace — classic end-time restoration language for the nation and its righteous core.

Rambam (Maimonides) on Jesus

Jesus of Nazareth, who aspired to be the Mashiach and was executed by the court, was also alluded to in Daniel’s prophecies, as ibid. 11:14 states: “The vulgar among your people shall exalt themselves in an attempt to fulfill the vision, but they shall stumble.”

Can there be a greater stumbling block than Christianity? All the prophets spoke of Mashiach as the redeemer of Israel and their savior who would gather their dispersed and strengthen their observance of the mitzvot. In contrast, Christianity caused the Jews to be slain by the sword, their remnants to be scattered and humbled, the Torah to be altered, and the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the Lord.

^{Jeremiah 19} O Lord, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.

²⁰ Shall a man make gods unto himself, and they are no gods?

²¹ Therefore, behold, I will this once cause them to know, I will cause them to know mine hand and my might; and they shall know that my name is The Lord.

Nevertheless, the intent of the Creator of the world is not within the power of man to comprehend, for His ways are not our ways, nor are His thoughts our thoughts. Ultimately, all the deeds of Jesus of Nazareth and that Ishmaelite [Muhammad] who arose after him will only serve to prepare the way for Mashiach’s coming and the improvement of the entire world, motivating the nations to serve God together as Zephaniah 3:9 states: “I will transform the peoples to a purer language so that they all will call upon the name of God and serve Him with one purpose.”

How will this come about? The entire world has already become filled with the mention of Mashiach, Torah, and mitzvot… When the true Messianic king arises and proves successful, his position becomes exalted and uplifted, and they will all return and realize that their ancestors bestowed upon them a false heritage and that their prophets and ancestors caused them to err.

The Rambam Makes His Point

The Rambam, in Mishneh Torah (Hilchot Melachim u’Milchamot 11:4), addresses claims about Jesus directly and rejects them firmly. He writes that Jesus was not the Messiah, but rather one who caused Israel to go astray and the world to err by interpreting the Torah incorrectly and leading people away from the commandments.

Maimonides states that Jesus and Muhammad were not true redeemers but instruments that ultimately helped spread knowledge of the Torah to the nations — paving the way for the true Messiah — yet they themselves failed to meet the criteria for the Messiah outlined in the Torah and the Prophets.

Rambam emphasizes that the true Messiah will be a king from the house of David who compels all Israel to walk in the ways of the Torah, fights God’s wars, gathers the exiles, rebuilds the Temple, and brings universal peace and knowledge of God. Jesus did none of these things. The Rambam’s clear, systematic analysis in the Mishneh Torah shows that Christian claims about Jesus as Messiah have no foundation in the original Hebrew sources.

I will address every major claim using the method from my book, Adam, the Blueprint of Creation and the Tree of Life (Dr. Robert Carter’s four questions applied to religious claims) and Jay Smith’s historical method (earliest sources, timing, continuity, and archaeology). I will also bring the actual Talmudic and rabbinic sources that the host cited, along with the counter-tradition from our sages.

1. Claim: Isaiah 53 clearly describes an individual suffering Messiah (singular pronouns in the Dead Sea Scrolls prove it)

The host’s argument: The Great Isaiah Scroll (1QIsa-a) from Qumran uses singular pronouns throughout (“he was wounded,” “he was cut off,” etc.). This proves the original Jewish understanding was individual, not collective.

Response:

Example: How Christian Interpretation Changes Isaiah 53

Here is a clear, side-by-side comparison of Isaiah 53:5–6, one of the most-quoted passages. This shows the original Hebrew, a literal translation that preserves the collective voice, and how Christian theology effectively rewrites the meaning by changing who is speaking.

1. Original Hebrew (Isaiah 53:5–6)

וְהוּא מְחֹלָל מִפְּשָׁעֵנוּ מְדֻכָּא מֵעֲוֹנֹתֵינוּ
מוּסַר שְׁלוֹמֵנוּ עָלָיו וּבַחֲבֻרָתוֹ נִרְפָּא־לָנוּ׃
כֻּלָּנוּ כַּצֹּאן תָּעִינוּ אִישׁ לְדַרְכּוֹ פָּנִינוּ
וַיהוָה הִפְגִּיעַ בּוֹ אֵת עֲוֹן כֻּלָּנוּ׃

2. Literal English Translation (Preserving the Original Voice)

But he was pierced because of our transgressions,
crushed because of our iniquities.
The chastisement of our peace was upon him,
and by his wound we were healed.
All of us like sheep have gone astray;
each one to his own way we have turned,
and the Lord has caused to fall upon him
the iniquity of all of us.

Key point: The speakers are saying “we” and “our”. They are confessing that they went astray and that the servant suffered because of their sins. In context, the speakers are the nations (or those outside Israel) speaking about Israel (the servant).

3. How Christian Interpretation Changes the Meaning

In most Christian teaching, preaching, and study Bibles, this passage is presented as if it is only about Jesus, and the “we/our” is reassigned to mean Christians or believers:

Christian Presentation (Typical Interpretation):

“Jesus was wounded for our transgressions…
by His stripes we are healed.
All we like sheep have gone astray…”

What this does:

• It removes the original speakers (the nations confessing about Israel).
• It makes the reader assume they are the “we” who went astray and that Jesus is the individual servant who died for them.
• It turns a national, collective passage into a purely individual, personal atonement story.

This is not a small shift in emphasis. It fundamentally changes who is speaking and who the servant represents.

Summary of the Change

Element	Original Hebrew Meaning	Common Christian Interpretation	Effect of the Change
Who is speaking?	The nations (or those outside Israel)	Christians / believers	Removes the national context
Who is the servant?	Israel / the righteous remnant	Exclusively Jesus	Turns collective suffering into individual
“We / Our”	The nations confessing their own sin	Reassigned to Christians	Changes the identity of the guilty party
Overall message	Nations recognize Israel’s suffering role	Personal salvation through Jesus’ death	Replaces national restoration with individual atonement

This pronoun and contextual shift are one of the clearest examples of how the original Hebrew blueprint was rewritten. The text itself was not heavily altered in most translations, but the meaning and speakers were reassigned to fit a completely different theological story.

This is the same pronoun-shift tactic we see across Christian interpretation. The chapter is written from the perspective of the nations speaking about Israel as a collective servant. The “we” and “our” language throughout makes this clear:

• “Surely he has borne our griefs…”
• “We all like sheep have gone astray…”
• “The Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

The Dead Sea Scrolls Isaiah

The Dead Sea Scrolls Isaiah Scroll does contain singular forms in many places, but it is not a perfect manuscript. It has numerous scribal errors, omissions, and variants. One well-known issue is that it appears to have been buried or stored in a way consistent with damaged or erroneous scrolls containing the Divine Name (a practice reflected in later Jewish handling of sacred texts). The host presents it as pristine proof. It is not.

The passage that contains the words HOLY, HOLY, HOLY, only contains (2) HOLY, HOLY. (Isaiah 6:3)

More importantly, even if the pronouns are singular in some manuscripts, the chapter’s context (the suffering servant bringing justice to the nations, the nations confessing their error about him) has been read nationally by Jewish interpreters for centuries. Rabbi Tovia Singer and Yehuda Israel have addressed this verse by verse on their channels, showing that the national reading is the plain sense.

2. Claim: Pre-Christian sources (Talmud, Zohar, Midrash, Targum) clearly teach a suffering/dying Messiah ben Joseph who rises

The host’s argument: Sanhedrin 98b calls the Messiah a “leper scholar” from Isaiah 53. The Zohar, Midrash Rabbah, and Targum Jonathan support the idea of a suffering figure. Messiah ben Joseph is pierced, atones, and rises.

Response (using actual sources):

• Sanhedrin 98b: The passage does mention a “leper scholar” in connection with Isaiah 53:4 in one opinion. However, this is one view among many in the Talmud. The same tractate and others present multiple opinions about the Messiah. There is no consensus that Isaiah 53 refers to a dying individual Messiah who rises on the third day.
• Messiah ben Joseph: This is a real tradition in some sources (e.g., certain midrashim and later Zohar passages). However, it is not the dominant or universal view, and it is often tied to a figure who fights in the final war and dies, not necessarily the primary Davidic Messiah who brings final redemption. The host presents it as the clear pre-Christian portrait. It is one thread among several.
• Targum Jonathan on Isaiah 52:13 does say “my servant the Messiah shall prosper,” but the Targumim frequently add interpretive layers. They do not prove that the plain text of Isaiah 53 was originally understood as a dying-and-rising individual.

The host repeatedly dismisses Rashi. Yet Rashi’s reading of Isaiah 53 as Israel is consistent with earlier sources and with the national-suffering theme that runs throughout the Tanakh (e.g., the servant songs in Isaiah, the corporate nature of Israel’s covenant). Our sages did not need the Church Fathers or later trauma to read the text this way.

3. Claim: The collective reading of Isaiah 53 is a late polemic (Rashi changed after the Crusades, Maimonides disqualified a dying Messiah)

Response:

This is historically inaccurate and selective.

• The national/collective reading of the servant songs appears in sources before the major traumas the host mentions. It is consistent with the overall biblical theme of Israel suffering on behalf of the nations and being vindicated.
• Maimonides (Rambam), in the Mishneh Torah and in his Epistle to Yemen, does emphasize a victorious, non-dying Messiah in his primary portrait. However, he was responding to the specific claims of Christianity and Islam in his time. He was not “hiding” an earlier Jewish belief in a dying Messiah. Rambam also addresses claims about Jesus in his writings on Daniel and elsewhere, rejecting them on textual and historical grounds.
• The idea that the collective reading was invented as a response to Christianity ignores that Jewish interpreters were reading the text nationally long before the major debates intensified.

Rabbi Tovia Singer has documented extensively how the Church Fathers (Justin Martyr, Origen, etc.) engaged in these debates and how the Christian reading developed. The host’s timeline is selective.

4. Claim: The Dead Sea Scrolls and other pre-Christian sources prove that the portrait of Jesus was already in Judaism

Response (Jay Smith method + Dr. Carter’s questions):

Using Jay Smith’s approach (earliest sources, timing, continuity, archaeology):

• The Great Isaiah Scroll is pre-Christian. That is true. However, the existence of a scroll does not prove that the interpretation the host gives it was the dominant or only Jewish reading.
• Many of the sources the host cites (certain Zohar passages, later midrashim) are post-Temple or even medieval. The host blurs the line between pre-Christian and later Jewish mystical traditions.
• Applying Dr. Robert Carter’s four questions to this claim:
  1. How did the host arrive at this unified portrait? By selecting certain passages and downplaying the diversity of opinion in the sources.
  2. What does the full picture show? The sources show multiple, sometimes conflicting, expectations. There was no single, clear “suffering-dying-rising Messiah ben Joseph who matches Jesus” portrait universally accepted before Christianity.
  3. Was there enough time and continuity? The Christian reading develops and solidifies in the centuries after Jesus, especially as the movement separates from Judaism.
  4. Does the rewrite match the original blueprint? No. The Torah’s consistent message is national covenant, repentance, and return — not inherited total depravity requiring a divine blood sacrifice.

5. Broader Pattern: The Rewrite of the Blueprint

This episode follows the same pattern I document in Adam, the Blueprint of Creation, and the Tree of Life, and in the “Two Sides of the Same Coin” series on beithashoavah.org:

• The original Hebrew blueprint teaches that humanity is created fundamentally good (99% good).
• The path to the Tree of Life (Torah) remains open through teshuvah.
• Suffering can be redemptive on a national and personal level without requiring a one-time divine sacrifice to fix “original sin.”

Christianity (and this podcast’s presentation) rewrites that blueprint. It turns national suffering into an individual’s atoning death, changes the nature of the problem (from choice and covenant to inherited depravity), and replaces the Tree of Life with the cross.

Paul’s role in this development has been addressed in my blogs and by others (including channels like History Valley). The shift toward a more Hellenistic, individual-focused soteriology has roots in the Roman world in which early Christianity developed.

The Invitation – Bring the Receipts

I am asking you directly, as I have asked others:

Please respond. Write me or record a conversation. Bring the actual Talmudic and midrashic sources in full context. Show where the plain text of Isaiah 53, read according to the rules of Hebrew grammar and the surrounding chapters, requires an individual dying-and-rising Messiah.

Rabbi Tovia Singer, Yehuda Israel, and many others have already addressed these exact claims with the sources. The collective/national reading is not a late invention forced by trauma. It is a legitimate and ancient reading of the text.

The original blueprint preserved by the Jewish people for over 3,300 years — in the text and in our lineage (Kohanim marker, Abrahamic DNA continuity) — tells a different story.

The Tree of Life was never lost. The path of teshuvah and tzedakah u’mishpat remains open.

From the Garden to Isaiah 53 – How Did We Get Here?

Next Blog coming

I am ready when you are.

— Gavriel