Hazan Gavriel ben David · Esnoga Beit HaShoavah · Amarillo, Texas · Parashat Bereshit

Parashat Bereshit is not a children’s story that happens to sit at the front of a library. It is the opening of a letter. The letter was not mailed to a faculty lounge. It was spoken to a people who stood at Sinai about 3,339 years ago, and it has been carried, letter by letter, by soferim who still write the large bet of Bereshit the size of a house.

Dan McClellan’s first proof of contradiction treats that letter as a stack of memos. Two creation accounts. Two names for God. Two orders of plants, animals, and human beings. Therefore, two authors. Therefore, the Bible contradicts itself before the ink is dry.

A biblical scholar can be trained, credentialed, and fluent. He still has no business translating our mail as if he sat in Hebrew school when the Sender was still speaking. Dan was not in that school.

The Masoretes were not inventing a harmony to protect a later dogma. The sofer is still writing the same scroll. Rabbi David Fohrman has spent a career showing why this is a book like no other — not a scrapbook of rival drafts — and why the scholar who stops at “contradiction” has already missed Adam the Blueprint and the Tree of Life.

This post is long on purpose. Bereshit will not flatten. We will give Dan his first proof on his own terms. Then we will walk through Fohrman’s reading of the verses. Then we will open the seventy meanings: the alef that becomes an ayin, the word Adam, the seventy nations in Genesis 10, and the Ten Sayings as medicine for Adam’s family.

Dan’s First Proof, Stated Fairly

Honesty first. If you cannot state the critic’s case, you are not answering him. You are preaching past him.

Dan’s first proof, repeated across his short videos on “the Bible’s first contradiction,” is this:

1. Genesis 1:1 through the first half of 2:4 is one creation account. God is called Elohim. Creation proceeds by speech. The order is: light; sky; land and plants; lights in the sky; fish and birds; land animals; then humankind, male and female together, as the last act of day six. Everything is called good. God rests on day seven.
2. Genesis 2:4b through chapter 3 is a second, older account. God is called Hashem Elohim. Creation proceeds by forming, planting, breathing, and walking. The human is formed first from the dust. Then a garden. Then trees. Then animals are formed and brought to humans. Then the woman is built from the side. God later finds something “not good” — the human alone — and has to keep working.
3. The verb in Genesis 2:19 is a wayyiqtol, the ordinary past-narrative form: “And Hashem Elohim formed from the ground every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens.” Dan says translators who render “had formed” are smuggling a pluperfect that the Hebrew does not mark. Birds of the heavens in 2:19 cannot be a local Eden subspecies, since after day five the sky was already filled.
4. Therefore, the two accounts contradict in order, in the portrait of God, and in the means of creation. The later Priestly writers, on this view, wrote Genesis 1 to correct or supersede the earlier story. A redactor stitched them with the toledot line in 2:4. Later readers invented harmonies because they needed one voice.

That is the proof. It is not a cartoon. It is the cradle of the documentary hypothesis, dating back to Astruc and Wellhausen. If Genesis cannot survive its own first two chapters, the rest of the scroll is already in pieces.

Now the question is not whether Dan can read a grammar book. The question is whether Genesis is a police report written for a modern seminar or a letter written in a language that stores seventy faces in a single verse.

A Scholar Has No Business Translating Our Mail

Mail has a sender, a recipient, and a house style. The Torah’s house style is not “univocality” as an academic dogma. It is Torah — teaching — written to be sung, debated, and lived by the children of those who heard it.

Three facts the seminar keeps off the slide:

First. The recipient is Israel. “You are called Adam,” the Talmud can say in one register, and in another register, every human being is in Adam, because the name itself is the species. A scholar who treats the scroll as a Near Eastern anthology is reading a carbon copy. He is not standing where the letter was opened.

Second. The page is unfinished without the mouth. A sofer writes no vowels. He writes a large bet, a small heh in 2:4, dots, breaks, and white fire around black fire. English Bibles choose one meaning and call it “the text.” That is not a translation. That is foreclosure. Chazal said the Torah has seventy faces. Wine is yayin, gematria 70. The Torah is compared to wine. Seventy nations. Seventy languages at Sinai. Seventy bulls on Sukkot for those nations. Seventy souls went down to Egypt. The scholar who needs one plain sense before breakfast has already left the school.

Third. Dan was not in Hebrew school 3,339 years ago. That number is not nostalgia. It is the claim of the calendar. A living chain of readers — Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, the Masoretes before them, the Tannaim before them — heard the same grammatical problem Dan hears in Bereshit and did not reach for two authors. They reached for syntax, midrash, and the next verse. When a modern critic discovers Rashi’s question and announces a new religion of sources, he has not outgrown the rabbis. He has stopped where they started.

Fohrman said the quiet part in the 18Forty conversation and in the Judaism Demystified sessions on divine authorship. The critics were not wrong to notice two names and two textures. They were wrong to treat the notice as an autopsy. The question “Why Elohim here and Hashem Elohim there?” is a great question. You do not honor a great question by firing the Author.

Fohrman’s Method: Stop Harmonizing. Start Listening.

Rabbi Fohrman’s answer to textual critics is not a patch kit. He will not tell you that Genesis 2:19 “just means had formed” and sit down. He also will not tell you that the stories do not differ. They differ on purpose. The difference is the meaning.

His method, the same method that built Aleph Beta and A Book Like No Other:

• Clear the lullaby. Ask the child questions.
• Watch words travel. If a rare verb or a pair of nouns appears twice, the Torah is inserting a hyperlink.
• Watch structure. Inversion, chiasm, nested frames, toledot headings.
• Refuse the false choice between “literal newspaper” and “myth to be decoded by experts.” The genre is Torah — a guide that teaches a way.

He called the two creation panels Russian dolls. The outer doll is Genesis 1. The inner doll is Genesis 2–3. You cannot pull them apart without breaking the face. Genesis 2:4 is not a clumsy stitch. It is the hinge that turns the cosmos into a family.

Fohrman on the Verses: The Two Faces of One Act

Genesis 1:1 — The house opens to the left

Bereshit bara Elohim et hashamayim ve’et ha’aretz.

Rashi’s first observation is grammar, not homily. Reshit in Tanakh almost always wants a construct: the beginning of something. Read that way, verse 1 is not a sealed sentence about creation from nothing as a later doctrine packaged it. It is a temporal frame: when Elohim began creating heaven and earth — the earth being tohu vavohu, darkness on the face of the deep, the spirit of Elohim hovering on the face of the waters — Elohim said, Let there be light.

Dan likes this grammar because he thinks it kills creation ex nihilo and leaves primordial water on the stage. The Jewish page never needed his permission. Rashi said it. The midrash on the letters said that the alef wanted to begin the Torah and was told to wait for Anochi at Sinai. The book already argues with itself on line one. That is not a seam between authors. That is the Author teaching you how to read.

Count what English hides. Seven words in the first verse. Six alefs in that sentence if you read with the old eyes that look for the calendar in the ink. The large bet is a house that opens to the left into the rest of the scroll. A translation that prints “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” as a closed English period has already lost the mail.

Genesis 1:2–31 — Elohim the Builder

Fohrman asks you to name the job. Elohim in chapter 1 builds by separation. Light from dark. Waters from waters. Sea from dry land. Then He fills the rooms He just framed: lights in the sky-room, fish and birds in the water-and-air rooms, land animals and the human in the earth-room. Days 1–3 make domains. Days 4–6 fill them. The seventh day stops the building.

Elohim is the name of power and judgment — din. He speaks. He evaluates. He calls it good. He does not yet walk in a garden in the day’s breeze. This is not a different deity. This is the face of the One who can hold a universe without collapsing it into a hug.

The human arrives last, male and female, in the image, blessed to be fruitful, to fill, to subdue, to rule. That is Adam as the crown of the architecture. Not yet Adam as a lonely body in dust.

Genesis 2:1–3 — The building stops so life can happen

Shabbat is not an appendix. Fohrman treats it as the condition for the second story. Building (melachah) ceases. What remains is organic unfolding — the world that grows because it was given a rhythm. If you miss this, you will think chapter 2 is a rival week. It is the inside of the house once the walls are up.

Genesis 2:4 — The hinge the critics call a stitch

Eleh toldot hashamayim veha’aretz behibare’am, beyom asot Hashem Elohim eretz veshamayim.

Fohrman’s slideshow point is surgical. Verse 1: Elohim creates the heavens and the earth. Verse 2:4: These are the generations — the offspring — of heaven and earth when they were created, on the day Hashem Elohim made earth and heaven.

Watch the inversion.

• Chapter 1: God is subject. Heaven and earth are objects.
• Chapter 2:4: Heaven and Earth become parents. God is named as the One who makes, but the grammar of toldot treats sky and soil as a lineage.
• Chapter 1: Heaven then Earth.
• Chapter 2:4: Earth then heaven.

That chiasm is not a redactor tripping on his cloak. It is a camera turn. The cosmos is complete. Now the story is what heaven and earth generate when the Name of compassion joins the Name of power — Hashem Elohim, never Hashem alone in this panel. The critics needed Elohim in file A and YHWH in file B. The Torah gave them the fused name on purpose. The fusion is the theology: the Judge and the Merciful are one, and the garden is where you find out whether the human can live inside that oneness.

Genesis 2:5–7 — The inverse world

Chapter 1 opened on too much water, too much dark, too much surge. Chapter 2 opens on the inverse problem: no shrub of the field yet, no herb of the field yet, because Hashem Elohim had not caused rain, and there was no human to work the ground. Then a mist rises and waters the face of the adamah. Then Hashem Elohim forms the human, ha’adam, from the adamah and breathes the breath of life into his nostrils, and the human becomes a living soul.

Fohrman: These are not two timelines fighting. They are two diagnoses of the same world. World One needs division, or it drowns. World Two needs union, or it bakes. Elohim separates. Hashem Elohim moistens. A mist is the reunion of the waters, chapter 1 split. Rain is heaven and earth acting like parents. That is why 2:4 called them toldot.

Dan hears “no plants” and slams it against day three. The verse does not say the planet is bald. It says the cultivated field — siach hasadeh, esev hasadeh — has not yet begun, because rain and a worker have not yet met. Chapter 2 is not rewinding the week. It is naming the partnership that the week was for.

Genesis 2:8–17 — The garden and the two trees

Hashem Elohim plants a garden in Eden, eastward, and places there the human He formed. Out of the ground He causes to grow every tree pleasant to the sight and good for food, and the Tree of Life in the midst of the garden, and the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil.

Here, Fohrman will not let the story be a Sunday-school mural. Child questions:

• Why a Tree of Life and a Tree of Knowledge of good and evil? Those ideas have nothing obvious to do with trees, and nothing obvious to do with each other.
• If they may eat of every tree but one, they already have life. Why plant a second tree in the middle, only to treat it as an emergency later?
• If they were mortal, what would a Tree of Life be doing among the living? If they were not, why a tree whose job is to keep them from dying?
• Eve speaks as if the forbidden tree is the one in the midst. Both special trees are in the midst. Did she confuse them?

Fohrman’s working answer, developed through A Book Like No Other and the older Tree of Life lectures that became The Beast That Crouches at the Door, is that the garden is not a snack aisle. It is a school for how to be human. Knowledge of good and evil seized as possession is not the same as good received from the Giver. Life taken as a private technology is not the same as life as a relationship. In one strand of the reading, the fruit is the knowledge, and the tree itself is life — one organism with two ways of approaching it. Stretch forth the hand, Genesis 3:22 will say. The extra phrase is not padding. A hand that seizes is already a different posture than a mouth that receives.

Devarim 30 will later put the same pair in Moshe’s mouth: life and good, death and evil. I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Choose life. The garden was never a closed myth. It is the first draft of the choice Israel must make on the plains of Moab.

Genesis 2:18–25 — Not good, the animals, the woman

This is Dan’s exhibit A. Chapter 1 already made animals on days five and six. Chapter 2 forms them after the human and parades them as failed companions.

Fohrman’s question is not “how do we erase the sequence?” His question is “What is the sequence doing inside the inner doll?”

The human is lonely. Hashem Elohim says it is not good. That sentence would be impossible in the music of chapter 1, where everything is good, and the human arrives already male and female. Chapter 2 is the interior of that pair. Image-bearing together is the outer fact. Becoming one flesh is the inner work. Animals can be named. They cannot be ezer kenegdo — a help against him, a corresponding strength. The forming and bringing are pedagogical. The human must learn what he is not before he can recognize the bone of his bone.

When the woman is built from the side, the human says the first poem in the Torah: this time, bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. She shall be called Ishah because she was taken from Ish. Fohrman will not let that become a property deed. The sentence is recognition, not acquisition. The two had been one. The split is for the sake of a face-to-face that chapter 1 could only state, and chapter 2 can finally stage.

A critic who needs both chapters to be chronological field logs will always win his own game. He defined the genre so that complementary cameras appear to be perjury. The Torah did not hire him as an editor.

Genesis 3 — The theory killer, and why it is not

The serpent. The added “do not touch.” The eyes opened. The voice is walking in the garden in the breeze of the day. The hiding. The questions. The verdicts. Then 3:22–24:

Hen ha’adam hayah ke’achad mimenu lada’at tov vara, ve’atah pen yishlach yado velakach gam me’etz hachayim ve’achal vachai le’olam.

Now that the human has become like one of us, knowing good and evil — and now, lest he stretch forth his hand and take also from the Tree of Life and eat and live forever. Keruvim. The turning sword. The way to the Tree of Life is guarded, not abolished.

Fohrman and his study partners linger on pen yishlach yado. Lest he send his hand. The fear is not that a vitamin will make them biologically immortal and embarrass the plot. The fear is a posture: seizure after rupture. To take life as a thing, after taking knowledge as a thing, would freeze the human in the fracture. Exile is severe mercy. The Tree of Life remains the destination of the rest of the book. Mishlei will call wisdom a tree of life. The menorah will be a tree of light in the house. The Torah itself will be called a tree of life for those who take hold of it — etz chayim hi lamachazikim bah. Hold, not seize. The verb matters.

Dan’s file says: two myths, two gods, two orders, case closed. Fohrman’s page says: one human, two faces of God, two ways to take a tree, and a sword that still has a job because Adam’s family is not done.

The Seventy Meanings: When Alef Becomes Ayin

An alef is nearly silent. Its number is one. It is the master, the teacher, the wonder when you read the letters backward — aluf, ulfana, pele. An ayin is a throat letter. Its number is seventy. It is an eye. It is a wellspring.

Jewish inner reading has long heard the move from one to seventy as the move from unity to the full spread of faces. The sound of alef is the simple vowel-place. The sound of ayin thickens it. Pair after pair in Hebrew plays this game: words that differ by alef and ayin map inner and outer, essence and appearance. Seventy is not a random large number. It is what one becomes when one is allowed to differentiate without being allowed to shatter.

Hence, the chain the midrash will not let you drop:

• Seventy faces of Torah.
• Seventy names.
• Seventy languages in which the Voice was heard at Sinai.
• Seventy nations from the table of Genesis 10.
• Seventy souls who go down to Egypt—the inner seventy who match the outer seventy.
• Seventy elders.
• Seventy bulls on Sukkot, one for each nation, because the house in Jerusalem was never a private club.

Devarim 32:8: When the Most High gave nations their inheritances, when He separated the children of Adam, He set the borders of the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel. The seventy out there is indexed to the seventy in here. Babel fractures the one language into the seventy. Sinai speaks the one Voice into the seventy. That is the same story told in opposite directions.

A biblical scholar who wants one meaning per verse is asking the alef to refuse to become an ayin. He wants the mail to be a telegram. The Sender wrote wine.

What the Word Adam Means — and How We Are All in Him

Adam is not a proper name like Dan. It is the creature taken from adamah, colored like adom, kept alive by dam. Earth. Red. Blood. The human is the dirt that learned to speak.

Then the word widens.

Genesis 1:27: Elohim created ha’adam in His image; male and female He created them. The singular contains the plural. Genesis 5:2: He called their name Adam, on the day they were created. The name is the species, the couple, and the first person. Three concentric circles. Pull one out and the others collapse.

Chazal pressed further. All souls were in Adam. Not as a biology textbook. As a claim about responsibility and image. What happens to the first human happens to the human. Cain’s question — am I my brother’s keeper? — is already a refusal to stay inside that name. The nations in Genesis 10 are not other species. They are Adam after Babel, mapped into seventy.

There is a stricter register in which Israel is called Adam, and a broader register in which Adam refers to any human who can hear “do these and live.” Vayikra 18:5: asher ya’aseh otam ha’adam vachai bahem — the human who does them shall live by them. The blueprint is not a mascot. It is a job description.

Later kabbalistic reading hears in אדם the span Adam–David–Mashiach, and hears in every person a spark of the first. You do not need to accept every map of the soul to hear the plain Torah point: the story refuses to let you treat the first human as a tribe’s private ancestor. Genesis will get to Avraham. It will not start there. It starts with the one who is all of us, because the healing has to be that wide.

That is Adam the Blueprint. Not a fossil. A pattern. Image. Dust. Breath. Male and female. Naming. Loneliness. Desire. Exile. Work. Childbirth. Death. Brother-blood on the ground. Then ten generations to Noah, then seventy nations, then one family asked to be a blessing to all the families of the adamah.

Genesis 10: The Seventy Nations Are the Map of Adam

Parashat Bereshit ends before the full table, but it aims at it. The toledot of Adam ran through Seth to Noah. Parashat Noach will list the sons of Yaphet, Cham, and Shem until the count the sages read as seventy.

Why list them? Because the Torah is not done with Adam when the garden closes. The flood is, in Fohrman’s reading, a second creation — ruach over waters again, dry land again, blessing again, and then a sign for all flesh. The rainbow is the language of Shabbat spoken to every child of Noah. Then the table of nations. Then Babel. Then Avraham.

If you cut Genesis 1–3 off as two myths for specialists, Genesis 10 becomes an antique ethnography. If you keep Adam as the blueprint, Genesis 10 is the blueprint unfolded. Seventy faces of the one human. Each nation has a specialization — war, beauty, commerce, song — all of them present in Israel as well, because Jacob’s house carried seventy souls and the Torah was translated into seventy tongues so that each face could hear.

Sukkot’s seventy bulls are the liturgical restatement of Bereshit. Adam’s family still has to be blessed by the house that guards the Tree.

The Ten Sayings as Healing for the Family of Adam

Fohrman’s later seasons of A Book Like No Other make a claim that should rearrange how a Jew hears both Bereshit and Shavuot. The Ten Sayings are not a sudden legal code dropped on a mountain. They are family medicine already pulsing through Genesis.

Track the wounds:

• A brother kills a brother. The ground drinks blood. The human hides from a Voice.
• A father blesses the wrong son in the dark. The Name is used to make a costume hold. Hashem Elokecha appears in the Torah’s mouth first in a lie.
• A house fills with stolen blessing, stolen identity, stolen gods.
• Two brothers meet. One says: I have seen your face as one sees the face of Elohim, and you accepted me.

Now hear Sinai.

No other gods — because the family already learned what happens when you let a costume become a god.

No image — because you cannot carve the Face, and yet you must learn to see a face.

Do not carry the Name in vain — because the Name was already carried in vain in Isaac’s tent.

Shabbat — because the Builder stopped, and the family of Adam still does not know how to stop seizing.

Honor father and mother — because the first families shattered exactly there.

Do not murder — Cain.

Do not commit adultery — the taken garden, the taken sister-wife stories, the taken body.

Do not steal — the birthright, the household gods, the blessing.

Do not bear false witness — the coat dipped in blood, the pledge of Tamar, the words that make darkness look like light.

Do not covet — the last disease, the eye that turns a brother’s portion into “mine.”

Fohrman tracks words in order from the Yaakov saga into Shemot 19–20. That is not an illustration. That is how the book is written. The mountain speaks the healing the house already needed. The Ten Sayings are how Adam’s family learns to live with the Tree rather than seize it.

A textual critic who slices J from P before he has watched those words travel has not found two authors. He has cut the nerve that carries the medicine.

What Dan Missed: Adam the Blueprint and the Tree of Life

Dan is careful with wayyiqtol. Good. Care is not the same as hearing.

He missed that Genesis 2:4 inverts Genesis 1:1 on purpose: heaven and earth becoming earth and heaven, objects becoming parents, Elohim becoming Hashem Elohim.

He missed that “not good” in 2:18 is not a Priestly embarrassment. It is the inner life of the image that Chapter 1 called very good. Marriage is the only place in the opening of the Torah where the text teaches you that good still has work to do.

He missed that the animals after the human are a lesson, not a second zoology.

He missed that the Tree of Life is not a leftover prop from a discarded draft. It is the book’s unfinished sentence. The sword turns. The way is guarded. The rest of Torah is how a family walks back without stretching out a seizing hand.

He missed that Adam is a blueprint, not a character in a short story that got rewritten by priests. Dust and image. One and two. Male and female. Seventy nations. Ten Sayings. The human who does them shall live by them.

He missed that a book like no other will look like a contradiction to anyone who needs one camera. Two names are not two gods. They are the only way a fragmented creature can be taught that the Judge and the Merciful are one. Hashem hu haElohim. That sentence at the end of Kings, on the mountain of Eliyahu, is already being taught in Bereshit 1–2.

Most of all, he missed the mail. The Torah is not a text that lost a war of sources and washed up in our hands. It is a letter that still arrives every year when we roll the scroll back to the large bet and begin again. You do not “translate” a letter to its rightful house by explaining that the house was built by a committee that could not keep its story straight.

How to Read Bereshit This Year

Do not skip the critic. State his proof. Then open the Hebrew.

Read chapter 1 as the building of rooms.

Read 2:4 as the turn from architecture to lineage.

Read chapter 2 as the inner doll: rain, dust, breath, loneliness, names, bone, garden, two trees.

Read chapter 3 as the seizure of knowledge and the guarding of life.

Read forward to chapter 10 until you can say “seventy” without flinching.

Read forward to Sinai until the Ten Sayings sound like surgery on Genesis, not like a different book.

Sit with Fohrman’s questions until they keep you awake. Why two trees? Why is a hand stretched out? Why two names that refuse to stay in separate files?

And when a scholar tells you the Bible’s first contradiction is sitting in your lap, answer like a Jew who still has the envelope: this is not a book like any other. We are all in Adam. The alef became an ayin so the one human could wear seventy faces and still be called back to the Tree. The Sayings are the way home. The sword is still turning. The house is still open on the left.

Shabbat shalom.

Hazan Gavriel ben David
Esnoga Beit HaShoavah — House of the Water Pouring
Amarillo, Texas

• The Raising Lion
• Who rejected the Messiah? It Is Not Who You Think.
• The Torah’s Hidden Clock
• Bible Codes Israel and Ishmael: Professor Glazerson, DNA Evidence, and the 70 Nations
• Jewish Perspective: Hashem Cannot Become a Man